从动物及其直接环境中分离的曲霉对唑的耐药性(2013-2023):系统综述。

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2025.1507997
Lucía Dieste-Pérez, Manon M C Holstege, Judith E de Jong, Annet E Heuvelink
{"title":"从动物及其直接环境中分离的曲霉对唑的耐药性(2013-2023):系统综述。","authors":"Lucía Dieste-Pérez, Manon M C Holstege, Judith E de Jong, Annet E Heuvelink","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1507997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The resistance of <i>Aspergillus</i> species to azoles in human medicine is gaining increasing attention, and the role of animals and agricultural practices in this issue is becoming a significant source of concern. To gain better insights into the occurrence of azole resistance in <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. isolates from animals, a systematic literature review was conducted. Searches were conducted in the PubMed and Scopus databases for articles addressing azole resistance in <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. isolates from both animals and their immediate environments, published between 2013 and 2024. Descriptive clinical cases were analyzed separately from articles providing <i>in-vitro</i> susceptibility test results. MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> values, along with the number of non-wild type (NWT) isolates, were either directly extracted from the articles or calculated based on published results of individual isolates or MIC distributions. Ultimately, seventy-three out of 2042 articles were included in the analysis. Articles reporting clinical cases included only horses, dogs, cats, zoo animals, and wildlife, with the majority of cases occurring outside Europe. Generally, successful clinical remission or recovery followed prolonged and continuous fungicide azole treatments, regardless of the azole-<i>Aspergillus</i> spp.-animal category combination. Itraconazole was the most frequently noted treatment in clinical cases involving companion animals (dogs and cats) and horses. The weighted geometric mean of the MIC<sub>50</sub> values for itraconazole was lowest for <i>A. fumigatus</i> isolates within the companion animal category. Zoo animals and wildlife were often treated with voriconazole, and the weighted geometric mean of the MIC<sub>50</sub> values for this and other azoles was equal to or slightly lower than those calculated for <i>A. fumigatus</i> isolates from other animal categories. NWT <i>A. fumigatus</i> isolates were reported in zoo animals and wildlife, horses, companion animals, and poultry for several azoles, occurring both in Europe and beyond, in healthy and sick animals. In conclusion, zoo animals and wildlife, horses, and poultry represent a more significant concern regarding the prevalence of <i>A. fumigatus</i> and <i>A. flavus</i> NWT isolates than other animal categories. Insufficient data prevented conclusions about the situation specifically in Europe, and therefore, more systematic and comparable data are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1507997"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Azole resistance in <i>Aspergillus</i> isolates from animals or their direct environment (2013-2023): a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Lucía Dieste-Pérez, Manon M C Holstege, Judith E de Jong, Annet E Heuvelink\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fvets.2025.1507997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The resistance of <i>Aspergillus</i> species to azoles in human medicine is gaining increasing attention, and the role of animals and agricultural practices in this issue is becoming a significant source of concern. To gain better insights into the occurrence of azole resistance in <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. isolates from animals, a systematic literature review was conducted. Searches were conducted in the PubMed and Scopus databases for articles addressing azole resistance in <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. isolates from both animals and their immediate environments, published between 2013 and 2024. Descriptive clinical cases were analyzed separately from articles providing <i>in-vitro</i> susceptibility test results. MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> values, along with the number of non-wild type (NWT) isolates, were either directly extracted from the articles or calculated based on published results of individual isolates or MIC distributions. Ultimately, seventy-three out of 2042 articles were included in the analysis. Articles reporting clinical cases included only horses, dogs, cats, zoo animals, and wildlife, with the majority of cases occurring outside Europe. Generally, successful clinical remission or recovery followed prolonged and continuous fungicide azole treatments, regardless of the azole-<i>Aspergillus</i> spp.-animal category combination. Itraconazole was the most frequently noted treatment in clinical cases involving companion animals (dogs and cats) and horses. The weighted geometric mean of the MIC<sub>50</sub> values for itraconazole was lowest for <i>A. fumigatus</i> isolates within the companion animal category. Zoo animals and wildlife were often treated with voriconazole, and the weighted geometric mean of the MIC<sub>50</sub> values for this and other azoles was equal to or slightly lower than those calculated for <i>A. fumigatus</i> isolates from other animal categories. NWT <i>A. fumigatus</i> isolates were reported in zoo animals and wildlife, horses, companion animals, and poultry for several azoles, occurring both in Europe and beyond, in healthy and sick animals. In conclusion, zoo animals and wildlife, horses, and poultry represent a more significant concern regarding the prevalence of <i>A. fumigatus</i> and <i>A. flavus</i> NWT isolates than other animal categories. Insufficient data prevented conclusions about the situation specifically in Europe, and therefore, more systematic and comparable data are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1507997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1507997\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1507997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类药物中曲霉对唑类药物的耐药性越来越受到关注,动物和农业实践在这一问题中的作用正成为一个重要的关注来源。为了更好地了解动物源曲霉菌株对唑类药物耐药的发生情况,我们进行了系统的文献综述。在PubMed和Scopus数据库中检索了2013年至2024年间发表的关于从动物及其直接环境中分离出的Aspergillus spp.耐唑的文章。描述性临床病例与提供体外药敏试验结果的文章分开分析。MIC50和MIC90值,以及非野生型(NWT)分离株的数量,要么直接从文章中提取,要么根据已发表的单个分离株或MIC分布结果计算。最终,2042篇文章中的73篇被纳入分析。报告临床病例的文章仅包括马、狗、猫、动物园动物和野生动物,大多数病例发生在欧洲以外。一般情况下,成功的临床缓解或恢复是通过长期和持续的杀菌剂唑治疗,而不管唑-曲霉类-动物类组合。伊曲康唑是涉及伴侣动物(狗和猫)和马的临床病例中最常见的治疗方法。伊曲康唑的MIC50加权几何平均值在伴侣动物类别中最低。动物园动物和野生动物经常使用伏立康唑处理,其MIC50值的加权几何平均值等于或略低于其他动物类别的烟曲霉分离物。据报道,在动物园动物和野生动物、马、伴侣动物和家禽中分离出了几种氮唑的NWT烟状芽孢杆菌,在欧洲和其他地区的健康和患病动物中均有发生。总之,动物园动物和野生动物、马和家禽比其他动物类别更关注烟曲霉和黄曲霉NWT分离株的流行情况。由于数据不足,无法对欧洲的具体情况作出结论,因此需要更系统和可比较的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Azole resistance in Aspergillus isolates from animals or their direct environment (2013-2023): a systematic review.

The resistance of Aspergillus species to azoles in human medicine is gaining increasing attention, and the role of animals and agricultural practices in this issue is becoming a significant source of concern. To gain better insights into the occurrence of azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. isolates from animals, a systematic literature review was conducted. Searches were conducted in the PubMed and Scopus databases for articles addressing azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. isolates from both animals and their immediate environments, published between 2013 and 2024. Descriptive clinical cases were analyzed separately from articles providing in-vitro susceptibility test results. MIC50 and MIC90 values, along with the number of non-wild type (NWT) isolates, were either directly extracted from the articles or calculated based on published results of individual isolates or MIC distributions. Ultimately, seventy-three out of 2042 articles were included in the analysis. Articles reporting clinical cases included only horses, dogs, cats, zoo animals, and wildlife, with the majority of cases occurring outside Europe. Generally, successful clinical remission or recovery followed prolonged and continuous fungicide azole treatments, regardless of the azole-Aspergillus spp.-animal category combination. Itraconazole was the most frequently noted treatment in clinical cases involving companion animals (dogs and cats) and horses. The weighted geometric mean of the MIC50 values for itraconazole was lowest for A. fumigatus isolates within the companion animal category. Zoo animals and wildlife were often treated with voriconazole, and the weighted geometric mean of the MIC50 values for this and other azoles was equal to or slightly lower than those calculated for A. fumigatus isolates from other animal categories. NWT A. fumigatus isolates were reported in zoo animals and wildlife, horses, companion animals, and poultry for several azoles, occurring both in Europe and beyond, in healthy and sick animals. In conclusion, zoo animals and wildlife, horses, and poultry represent a more significant concern regarding the prevalence of A. fumigatus and A. flavus NWT isolates than other animal categories. Insufficient data prevented conclusions about the situation specifically in Europe, and therefore, more systematic and comparable data are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信