通过无偏聚类分析揭示与Lp(a)升高相关的患者概况。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1546351
Miguel Saraiva, Jonatas Garcez, Beatriz Tavares da Silva, Inês Poças Ferreira, José Carlos Oliveira, Isabel Palma
{"title":"通过无偏聚类分析揭示与Lp(a)升高相关的患者概况。","authors":"Miguel Saraiva, Jonatas Garcez, Beatriz Tavares da Silva, Inês Poças Ferreira, José Carlos Oliveira, Isabel Palma","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1546351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been recognized as key factor in cardiovascular research. This study aimed to identify key patient profiles based on the characteristics of a Portuguese cohort of adults who were referred for Lp(a) measurement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An unsupervised clustering analysis was performed on 661 Portuguese adults to identify patient profiles associated with lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] based on a range of demographic and clinical indicators. Lp(a) levels were deliberately excluded from the algorithm, to ensure an unbiased cluster formation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed two distinct clusters based on Lp(a) levels. Cluster 1 (<i>n</i> = 336) exhibited significantly higher median Lp(a) levels than Cluster 2 (<i>n</i> = 325; <i>p</i> = 0.004), with 46.4% of individuals exceeding the 75 nmol/L (30 mg/dl) risk threshold (<i>p</i> < 0.001). This group was characterized by older age (median 57 vs. 45 years), lower body mass index (27.17 vs. 29.40), and a majority male composition (73.8% vs. 26.5%). Additionally, Cluster 1 displayed a higher prevalence of hypertension (56.5% vs. 31.1%), diabetes <i>mellitus</i> (38.7% vs. 17.2%), and dyslipidemia (88.7% vs. 55.4%). These data suggest that the Cluster 1 profile has a potential increased risk for cardiovascular complications and underscore the importance of considering specific patient profiles for Lp(a) screening and cardiovascular risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the study limitations, including single-institution data and potential selection bias, this study highlights the utility of cluster analysis in identifying clinically meaningful patient profiles and suggests that proactive screening and management of Lp(a) levels, particularly in patients with characteristics resembling those of Cluster 1, may be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1546351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling patient profiles associated with elevated Lp(a) through an unbiased clustering analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Saraiva, Jonatas Garcez, Beatriz Tavares da Silva, Inês Poças Ferreira, José Carlos Oliveira, Isabel Palma\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1546351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been recognized as key factor in cardiovascular research. This study aimed to identify key patient profiles based on the characteristics of a Portuguese cohort of adults who were referred for Lp(a) measurement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An unsupervised clustering analysis was performed on 661 Portuguese adults to identify patient profiles associated with lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] based on a range of demographic and clinical indicators. Lp(a) levels were deliberately excluded from the algorithm, to ensure an unbiased cluster formation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed two distinct clusters based on Lp(a) levels. Cluster 1 (<i>n</i> = 336) exhibited significantly higher median Lp(a) levels than Cluster 2 (<i>n</i> = 325; <i>p</i> = 0.004), with 46.4% of individuals exceeding the 75 nmol/L (30 mg/dl) risk threshold (<i>p</i> < 0.001). This group was characterized by older age (median 57 vs. 45 years), lower body mass index (27.17 vs. 29.40), and a majority male composition (73.8% vs. 26.5%). Additionally, Cluster 1 displayed a higher prevalence of hypertension (56.5% vs. 31.1%), diabetes <i>mellitus</i> (38.7% vs. 17.2%), and dyslipidemia (88.7% vs. 55.4%). These data suggest that the Cluster 1 profile has a potential increased risk for cardiovascular complications and underscore the importance of considering specific patient profiles for Lp(a) screening and cardiovascular risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the study limitations, including single-institution data and potential selection bias, this study highlights the utility of cluster analysis in identifying clinically meaningful patient profiles and suggests that proactive screening and management of Lp(a) levels, particularly in patients with characteristics resembling those of Cluster 1, may be beneficial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1546351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965613/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1546351\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1546351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脂蛋白(a) [Lp(a)]已被公认为心血管研究的关键因素。本研究旨在根据葡萄牙成人队列的特征确定关键患者的概况,这些患者被转介进行Lp(a)测量。方法:对661名葡萄牙成年人进行无监督聚类分析,根据一系列人口统计学和临床指标确定与脂蛋白a [Lp(a)]相关的患者概况。Lp(a)水平被故意排除在算法之外,以确保无偏聚类形成。结果:分析显示基于Lp(a)水平的两个不同的聚类。集群1 (n = 336)的中位Lp(a)水平显著高于集群2 (n = 325);p = 0.004), 46.4%的个体超过75 nmol/L (30 mg/dl)的危险阈值(糖尿病(38.7% vs. 17.2%)和血脂异常(88.7% vs. 55.4%)。这些数据表明,第1类患者有可能增加心血管并发症的风险,并强调了在Lp(a)筛查和心血管风险评估中考虑特定患者特征的重要性。结论:尽管研究存在局限性,包括单机构数据和潜在的选择偏倚,但本研究强调了聚类分析在确定有临床意义的患者概况方面的效用,并表明主动筛查和管理Lp(a)水平,特别是在具有类似聚类1特征的患者中,可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unveiling patient profiles associated with elevated Lp(a) through an unbiased clustering analysis.

Introduction: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been recognized as key factor in cardiovascular research. This study aimed to identify key patient profiles based on the characteristics of a Portuguese cohort of adults who were referred for Lp(a) measurement.

Method: An unsupervised clustering analysis was performed on 661 Portuguese adults to identify patient profiles associated with lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] based on a range of demographic and clinical indicators. Lp(a) levels were deliberately excluded from the algorithm, to ensure an unbiased cluster formation.

Results: The analysis revealed two distinct clusters based on Lp(a) levels. Cluster 1 (n = 336) exhibited significantly higher median Lp(a) levels than Cluster 2 (n = 325; p = 0.004), with 46.4% of individuals exceeding the 75 nmol/L (30 mg/dl) risk threshold (p < 0.001). This group was characterized by older age (median 57 vs. 45 years), lower body mass index (27.17 vs. 29.40), and a majority male composition (73.8% vs. 26.5%). Additionally, Cluster 1 displayed a higher prevalence of hypertension (56.5% vs. 31.1%), diabetes mellitus (38.7% vs. 17.2%), and dyslipidemia (88.7% vs. 55.4%). These data suggest that the Cluster 1 profile has a potential increased risk for cardiovascular complications and underscore the importance of considering specific patient profiles for Lp(a) screening and cardiovascular risk assessment.

Conclusion: Despite the study limitations, including single-institution data and potential selection bias, this study highlights the utility of cluster analysis in identifying clinically meaningful patient profiles and suggests that proactive screening and management of Lp(a) levels, particularly in patients with characteristics resembling those of Cluster 1, may be beneficial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信