天地机器人辅助单侧双门静脉内镜腰椎椎间融合术治疗老年腰椎退行性疾病的回顾性研究

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Guofang Fang, Jin Zhang, Hailun Zhu, Xunwei Lai, Jianchang Wu, Xiuwang Li, Zhouxu Hou, Fangxin Chen, Hongxun Sang
{"title":"天地机器人辅助单侧双门静脉内镜腰椎椎间融合术治疗老年腰椎退行性疾病的回顾性研究","authors":"Guofang Fang, Jin Zhang, Hailun Zhu, Xunwei Lai, Jianchang Wu, Xiuwang Li, Zhouxu Hou, Fangxin Chen, Hongxun Sang","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-02433-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF) has been successfully used to treat degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Nevertheless, the duration of the UBE-LIF procedure notably exceeds that of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF), increasing the potential for perioperative complications, particularly in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to compare the results of robot assistance (RA) and non-assistance (NA) groups and to explore the benefits of UBE-LIF assisted by a Tianji robot in aged patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>60 patients were divided into two groups: 30 patients in the RA group and 30 in the NA group from January 2022 to June 2023. The surgical duration, estimated intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, length of hospital stays, and radiation exposure were examined and documented. Clinical assessments, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, postoperative complications, and interbody fusion rate, were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative drainage, length of postoperative hospital stay, or fusion rate. However, the RA group exhibited lower perioperative complications, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and duration of radiation exposure than the NA group. The average total operation time in the RA group was 105.3 ± 25.8 min, which was significantly shorter than the NA group's average of 130.5 ± 22.5 min (P < 0.001). Furthermore, both groups demonstrated improvements in all clinical outcomes at various postoperative time points, with no significant differences between them (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the NA approach, robot-assisted UBE-LIF technology provides accurate intraoperative guidance and helps spinal surgeons achieve accurate decompression. Furthermore, it can reduce radiation exposure, operation time, blood loss, and surgical complications, thereby improving the surgical efficiency and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion assisted by a Tianji robot for lumbar degenerative disease in elderly patients: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Guofang Fang, Jin Zhang, Hailun Zhu, Xunwei Lai, Jianchang Wu, Xiuwang Li, Zhouxu Hou, Fangxin Chen, Hongxun Sang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40001-025-02433-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF) has been successfully used to treat degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Nevertheless, the duration of the UBE-LIF procedure notably exceeds that of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF), increasing the potential for perioperative complications, particularly in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to compare the results of robot assistance (RA) and non-assistance (NA) groups and to explore the benefits of UBE-LIF assisted by a Tianji robot in aged patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>60 patients were divided into two groups: 30 patients in the RA group and 30 in the NA group from January 2022 to June 2023. The surgical duration, estimated intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, length of hospital stays, and radiation exposure were examined and documented. Clinical assessments, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, postoperative complications, and interbody fusion rate, were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative drainage, length of postoperative hospital stay, or fusion rate. However, the RA group exhibited lower perioperative complications, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and duration of radiation exposure than the NA group. The average total operation time in the RA group was 105.3 ± 25.8 min, which was significantly shorter than the NA group's average of 130.5 ± 22.5 min (P < 0.001). Furthermore, both groups demonstrated improvements in all clinical outcomes at various postoperative time points, with no significant differences between them (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the NA approach, robot-assisted UBE-LIF technology provides accurate intraoperative guidance and helps spinal surgeons achieve accurate decompression. Furthermore, it can reduce radiation exposure, operation time, blood loss, and surgical complications, thereby improving the surgical efficiency and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969944/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02433-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02433-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:单侧双门静脉内窥镜腰椎椎体间融合术(UBE-LIF)已成功用于治疗退行性腰椎疾病。然而,UBE-LIF手术的持续时间明显超过微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(mistlif),增加了围手术期并发症的可能性,特别是在老年患者中。目的:本回顾性研究旨在比较机器人辅助(RA)组和非辅助(NA)组的结果,并探讨由天际机器人辅助的UBE-LIF在老年患者中的益处。方法:从2022年1月至2023年6月将60例患者分为两组:RA组30例,NA组30例。检查并记录手术时间、术中估计出血量、术后引流、住院时间和辐射暴露情况。临床评估,包括Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、改良MacNab标准、术后并发症和体间融合率也进行了评估。结果:两组患者在术后引流、术后住院时间、融合率等方面均无显著差异。然而,RA组比NA组表现出更低的围手术期并发症、术中出血量和辐射暴露时间。RA组的平均总手术时间为105.3±25.8 min,明显短于NA组的130.5±22.5 min (P < 0.05)。结论:与NA入路相比,机器人辅助的UBE-LIF技术可以提供准确的术中指导,帮助脊柱外科医生实现准确的减压。减少辐射照射,缩短手术时间,减少出血量,减少手术并发症,提高手术效率和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion assisted by a Tianji robot for lumbar degenerative disease in elderly patients: a retrospective study.

Background: Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF) has been successfully used to treat degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Nevertheless, the duration of the UBE-LIF procedure notably exceeds that of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF), increasing the potential for perioperative complications, particularly in elderly patients.

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to compare the results of robot assistance (RA) and non-assistance (NA) groups and to explore the benefits of UBE-LIF assisted by a Tianji robot in aged patients.

Methods: 60 patients were divided into two groups: 30 patients in the RA group and 30 in the NA group from January 2022 to June 2023. The surgical duration, estimated intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, length of hospital stays, and radiation exposure were examined and documented. Clinical assessments, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, postoperative complications, and interbody fusion rate, were also evaluated.

Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative drainage, length of postoperative hospital stay, or fusion rate. However, the RA group exhibited lower perioperative complications, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and duration of radiation exposure than the NA group. The average total operation time in the RA group was 105.3 ± 25.8 min, which was significantly shorter than the NA group's average of 130.5 ± 22.5 min (P < 0.001). Furthermore, both groups demonstrated improvements in all clinical outcomes at various postoperative time points, with no significant differences between them (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Compared with the NA approach, robot-assisted UBE-LIF technology provides accurate intraoperative guidance and helps spinal surgeons achieve accurate decompression. Furthermore, it can reduce radiation exposure, operation time, blood loss, and surgical complications, thereby improving the surgical efficiency and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信