机器人切除咽旁和咽后病变。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Stephen Robertson, Philip Touska, Jack Faulkner, Alastair Fry, Aleix Rovira, Ricard Simo, Jean-Pierre Jeannon, Asit Arora
{"title":"机器人切除咽旁和咽后病变。","authors":"Stephen Robertson, Philip Touska, Jack Faulkner, Alastair Fry, Aleix Rovira, Ricard Simo, Jean-Pierre Jeannon, Asit Arora","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09345-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic surgery is currently transforming Head and Neck cancer surgery by providing novel approaches to previously challenging procedures, with a wide range of benefits including reduced morbidity and length of stay for patients. Currently at Guy's and St. Thomas' hospital, extended applications are constantly being evaluated to advance the scope of robotic surgery further, which includes using it for parapharyngeal (PPS) and retropharyngeal space (RPS) tumours. Literature suggests over 50% of PPS tumours are pleomorphic adenomas, whereas RPS tumours often represent nodal metastasis or soft tissue inflammatory masses(4,9). We have collated a case series of fifteen patients who had either PPS or RPS tumours excised via robotic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study of fifteen patients collected between October 2018 and August 2024 with retrospective swallow assessment, for all patients with a mass in the PPS or RPS treated by trans-oral robotic surgery. Excision was performed by the Intuitive da Vinci Xi robotic surgical system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age was 51 yrs (10 males, 5 females), with an average radiological tumour diameter of 3.79 cm and volume of 35.48 cm<sup>3</sup>. 33% of PPS cases were pleomorphic adenoma, whilst 33% of cases were malignant (carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma). There was no surgical capsular breach, with complete excision in all cases and no cases required conversion to open. Close margins were seen in 40%. Median length of stay was 2 days with patients starting oral diet on day 1 post operation, however three patients later required NG-tube insertion due to wound dehiscence. There have been no recurrences with mean follow up currently at 3.32 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TORS provides a safe and feasible option for excision of both PPS and RPS tumours, with no sacrifice of surgical or oncological outcomes. Given the successful results, further adoption of TORS for PPS and RPS tumours is recommended. Careful patient selection and specialist radiological input to aid three-dimensional anatomical understanding are fundamental to these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic excision of parapharyngeal and retropharyngeal lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Robertson, Philip Touska, Jack Faulkner, Alastair Fry, Aleix Rovira, Ricard Simo, Jean-Pierre Jeannon, Asit Arora\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-025-09345-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic surgery is currently transforming Head and Neck cancer surgery by providing novel approaches to previously challenging procedures, with a wide range of benefits including reduced morbidity and length of stay for patients. Currently at Guy's and St. Thomas' hospital, extended applications are constantly being evaluated to advance the scope of robotic surgery further, which includes using it for parapharyngeal (PPS) and retropharyngeal space (RPS) tumours. Literature suggests over 50% of PPS tumours are pleomorphic adenomas, whereas RPS tumours often represent nodal metastasis or soft tissue inflammatory masses(4,9). We have collated a case series of fifteen patients who had either PPS or RPS tumours excised via robotic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study of fifteen patients collected between October 2018 and August 2024 with retrospective swallow assessment, for all patients with a mass in the PPS or RPS treated by trans-oral robotic surgery. Excision was performed by the Intuitive da Vinci Xi robotic surgical system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age was 51 yrs (10 males, 5 females), with an average radiological tumour diameter of 3.79 cm and volume of 35.48 cm<sup>3</sup>. 33% of PPS cases were pleomorphic adenoma, whilst 33% of cases were malignant (carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma). There was no surgical capsular breach, with complete excision in all cases and no cases required conversion to open. Close margins were seen in 40%. Median length of stay was 2 days with patients starting oral diet on day 1 post operation, however three patients later required NG-tube insertion due to wound dehiscence. There have been no recurrences with mean follow up currently at 3.32 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TORS provides a safe and feasible option for excision of both PPS and RPS tumours, with no sacrifice of surgical or oncological outcomes. Given the successful results, further adoption of TORS for PPS and RPS tumours is recommended. Careful patient selection and specialist radiological input to aid three-dimensional anatomical understanding are fundamental to these outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09345-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09345-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介目前,机器人手术正在改变头颈部癌症手术,为以前具有挑战性的手术提供了新的方法,并带来了广泛的益处,包括降低发病率和缩短患者住院时间。目前,盖伊和圣托马斯医院正在不断评估机器人手术的扩展应用,以进一步扩大机器人手术的范围,包括用于咽旁(PPS)和咽后间隙(RPS)肿瘤。文献表明,50%以上的咽旁肿瘤是多形性腺瘤,而咽后间隙肿瘤通常是结节转移或软组织炎性肿块(4,9)。我们整理了15例通过机器人手术切除PPS或RPS肿瘤的患者的系列病例:一项前瞻性研究,收集了 2018 年 10 月至 2024 年 8 月期间所有经口机器人手术治疗的 PPS 或 RPS 肿块患者的 15 例病例,并进行了回顾性吞咽评估。切除术由 Intuitive da Vinci Xi 机器人手术系统完成:平均年龄为 51 岁(10 名男性,5 名女性),肿瘤的平均放射学直径为 3.79 厘米,体积为 35.48 立方厘米。33% 的 PPS 病例为多形性腺瘤,33% 的病例为恶性肿瘤(癌前多形性腺瘤)。所有病例均完全切除,无手术破囊现象,无病例需要转为开腹手术。40%的病例边缘密合。中位住院时间为 2 天,患者在术后第 1 天开始口服饮食,但后来有 3 名患者因伤口裂开而需要插入 NG 管。目前的平均随访时间为 3.32 年,没有出现复发情况:TORS为PPS和RPS肿瘤的切除提供了一个安全可行的选择,而且不会牺牲手术或肿瘤效果。鉴于其成功的结果,建议进一步采用 TORS 治疗 PPS 和 RPS 肿瘤。谨慎选择患者和专业的放射学检查以帮助了解三维解剖结构是取得这些成果的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic excision of parapharyngeal and retropharyngeal lesions.

Introduction: Robotic surgery is currently transforming Head and Neck cancer surgery by providing novel approaches to previously challenging procedures, with a wide range of benefits including reduced morbidity and length of stay for patients. Currently at Guy's and St. Thomas' hospital, extended applications are constantly being evaluated to advance the scope of robotic surgery further, which includes using it for parapharyngeal (PPS) and retropharyngeal space (RPS) tumours. Literature suggests over 50% of PPS tumours are pleomorphic adenomas, whereas RPS tumours often represent nodal metastasis or soft tissue inflammatory masses(4,9). We have collated a case series of fifteen patients who had either PPS or RPS tumours excised via robotic surgery.

Methods: A prospective study of fifteen patients collected between October 2018 and August 2024 with retrospective swallow assessment, for all patients with a mass in the PPS or RPS treated by trans-oral robotic surgery. Excision was performed by the Intuitive da Vinci Xi robotic surgical system.

Results: The average age was 51 yrs (10 males, 5 females), with an average radiological tumour diameter of 3.79 cm and volume of 35.48 cm3. 33% of PPS cases were pleomorphic adenoma, whilst 33% of cases were malignant (carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma). There was no surgical capsular breach, with complete excision in all cases and no cases required conversion to open. Close margins were seen in 40%. Median length of stay was 2 days with patients starting oral diet on day 1 post operation, however three patients later required NG-tube insertion due to wound dehiscence. There have been no recurrences with mean follow up currently at 3.32 years.

Conclusions: TORS provides a safe and feasible option for excision of both PPS and RPS tumours, with no sacrifice of surgical or oncological outcomes. Given the successful results, further adoption of TORS for PPS and RPS tumours is recommended. Careful patient selection and specialist radiological input to aid three-dimensional anatomical understanding are fundamental to these outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信