增强ct与双增强超声对胃癌术前t分期诊断准确性的比较:一项meta分析。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
MingYue Lv, Xu Hui, Xin Yang, SuSu Li, ZhiGuo Mao, XinHua Zhang, KeHu Yang
{"title":"增强ct与双增强超声对胃癌术前t分期诊断准确性的比较:一项meta分析。","authors":"MingYue Lv, Xu Hui, Xin Yang, SuSu Li, ZhiGuo Mao, XinHua Zhang, KeHu Yang","doi":"10.1186/s40644-025-00861-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer (GC) depends on effective diagnostic methods. Enhanced computed tomography (enhanced-CT) is a widely used and reliable preoperative assessment tool for GC, Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCEUS) can display the structure and layers of the gastric wall more accurately, and has high sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing the preoperative T-staging accuracy of DCEUS and enhanced-CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify eligible articles from inception to February 19, 2024. The study included both prospective and retrospective studies involving patients with GC who underwent DCEUS or enhanced-CT. This encompassed studies utilizing comparative diagnostic test accuracy (CDTA) with both DCEUS and enhanced-CT, as well as studies employing single diagnostic test accuracy (SDTA) with either DCEUS or enhanced-CT alone. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-C (QUADAS-C) and Assessment Of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 studies involving 6,374 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among these, 3 studies (319 patients) directly compared dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS) and enhanced computed tomography (CT), while 31 studies (5,180 patients) evaluated enhanced CT alone, and 5 studies (875 patients) assessed DCEUS alone. For the direct comparison studies (CDTA), DCEUS demonstrated higher sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) for T1-T4 staging compared to enhanced CT, with moderate to low certainty of evidence. Specifically, DCEUS showed superior performance in detecting early-stage (T1) and advanced-stage (T4) tumors. Enhanced CT, while effective, had lower sensitivity across all stages, particularly for T1 tumors. In the single-modality studies (SDTA), DCEUS consistently showed higher sensitivity for T2-T4 staging compared to enhanced CT, with comparable specificity. However, the certainty of evidence for indirect comparisons was very low, highlighting the need for further high-quality comparative studies. Overall, DCEUS appears to be a promising modality for gastric cancer T staging, particularly for early-stage detection, but the limited number of direct comparative studies underscores the need for more robust evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence indicates that DCEUS significantly outperforms enhanced-CT in terms of SE and diagnostic accuracy for preoperative T-staging of GC, while maintaining comparable SP. However, these findings require further validation through rigorous studies with larger sample sizes and improved methodological quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of enhanced-CT and double contrast-enhanced ultrasound for preoperative T-staging of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"MingYue Lv, Xu Hui, Xin Yang, SuSu Li, ZhiGuo Mao, XinHua Zhang, KeHu Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40644-025-00861-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer (GC) depends on effective diagnostic methods. Enhanced computed tomography (enhanced-CT) is a widely used and reliable preoperative assessment tool for GC, Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCEUS) can display the structure and layers of the gastric wall more accurately, and has high sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing the preoperative T-staging accuracy of DCEUS and enhanced-CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify eligible articles from inception to February 19, 2024. The study included both prospective and retrospective studies involving patients with GC who underwent DCEUS or enhanced-CT. This encompassed studies utilizing comparative diagnostic test accuracy (CDTA) with both DCEUS and enhanced-CT, as well as studies employing single diagnostic test accuracy (SDTA) with either DCEUS or enhanced-CT alone. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-C (QUADAS-C) and Assessment Of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 studies involving 6,374 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among these, 3 studies (319 patients) directly compared dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS) and enhanced computed tomography (CT), while 31 studies (5,180 patients) evaluated enhanced CT alone, and 5 studies (875 patients) assessed DCEUS alone. For the direct comparison studies (CDTA), DCEUS demonstrated higher sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) for T1-T4 staging compared to enhanced CT, with moderate to low certainty of evidence. Specifically, DCEUS showed superior performance in detecting early-stage (T1) and advanced-stage (T4) tumors. Enhanced CT, while effective, had lower sensitivity across all stages, particularly for T1 tumors. In the single-modality studies (SDTA), DCEUS consistently showed higher sensitivity for T2-T4 staging compared to enhanced CT, with comparable specificity. However, the certainty of evidence for indirect comparisons was very low, highlighting the need for further high-quality comparative studies. Overall, DCEUS appears to be a promising modality for gastric cancer T staging, particularly for early-stage detection, but the limited number of direct comparative studies underscores the need for more robust evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence indicates that DCEUS significantly outperforms enhanced-CT in terms of SE and diagnostic accuracy for preoperative T-staging of GC, while maintaining comparable SP. However, these findings require further validation through rigorous studies with larger sample sizes and improved methodological quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966938/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00861-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00861-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胃癌(GC)术前的准确分期取决于有效的诊断方法。增强型计算机断层扫描(Enhanced computed tomography,ECT)是一种广泛应用且可靠的胃癌术前评估工具,而双对比增强超声(Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound,DCEUS)能更准确地显示胃壁的结构和层次,并具有较高的敏感性(SE)和特异性(SP):本研究旨在进行一项全面的荟萃分析,比较 DCEUS 和增强 CT 的术前 T 分期准确性:方法:在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了系统性文献检索,以确定从开始到 2024 年 2 月 19 日期间符合条件的文章。研究包括涉及接受 DCEUS 或增强 CT 检查的 GC 患者的前瞻性和回顾性研究。其中包括同时采用 DCEUS 和增强 CT 的比较诊断测试准确性 (CDTA) 的研究,以及仅采用 DCEUS 或增强 CT 的单一诊断测试准确性 (SDTA) 的研究。偏倚风险采用诊断准确性研究质量评估-C(QUADAS-C)和诊断准确性研究评估-2(QUADAS-2)工具进行评估。每项结果的证据质量均采用 GRADE(建议评估、发展和评价分级)进行评估:本次荟萃分析共纳入 39 项研究,涉及 6374 名患者。其中,3 项研究(319 名患者)直接比较了动态对比增强超声(DCEUS)和增强型计算机断层扫描(CT),31 项研究(5180 名患者)单独评估了增强型 CT,5 项研究(875 名患者)单独评估了 DCEUS。在直接对比研究(CDTA)中,与增强 CT 相比,DCEUS 对 T1-T4 分期的敏感性(SE)和特异性(SP)更高,证据的确定性为中低。具体而言,DCEUS 在检测早期(T1)和晚期(T4)肿瘤方面表现更优。增强 CT 虽然有效,但在所有分期中灵敏度较低,尤其是对 T1 期肿瘤。在单一模式研究(SDTA)中,与增强 CT 相比,DCEUS 对 T2-T4 分期的灵敏度更高,特异性也相当。然而,间接比较的证据确定性非常低,这突出表明需要进一步开展高质量的比较研究。总体而言,DCEUS似乎是一种很有前景的胃癌T分期方式,尤其是在早期检测方面,但直接比较研究的数量有限,这凸显出需要更有力的证据:目前的证据表明,在胃癌术前 T 型分期方面,DCEUS 在 SE 和诊断准确性方面明显优于增强 CT,同时保持了可比的 SP。然而,这些发现还需要通过样本量更大、方法质量更高的严格研究来进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of enhanced-CT and double contrast-enhanced ultrasound for preoperative T-staging of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Background: Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer (GC) depends on effective diagnostic methods. Enhanced computed tomography (enhanced-CT) is a widely used and reliable preoperative assessment tool for GC, Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCEUS) can display the structure and layers of the gastric wall more accurately, and has high sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP).

Objective: The present study aims to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing the preoperative T-staging accuracy of DCEUS and enhanced-CT.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify eligible articles from inception to February 19, 2024. The study included both prospective and retrospective studies involving patients with GC who underwent DCEUS or enhanced-CT. This encompassed studies utilizing comparative diagnostic test accuracy (CDTA) with both DCEUS and enhanced-CT, as well as studies employing single diagnostic test accuracy (SDTA) with either DCEUS or enhanced-CT alone. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-C (QUADAS-C) and Assessment Of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation).

Results: A total of 39 studies involving 6,374 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among these, 3 studies (319 patients) directly compared dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS) and enhanced computed tomography (CT), while 31 studies (5,180 patients) evaluated enhanced CT alone, and 5 studies (875 patients) assessed DCEUS alone. For the direct comparison studies (CDTA), DCEUS demonstrated higher sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) for T1-T4 staging compared to enhanced CT, with moderate to low certainty of evidence. Specifically, DCEUS showed superior performance in detecting early-stage (T1) and advanced-stage (T4) tumors. Enhanced CT, while effective, had lower sensitivity across all stages, particularly for T1 tumors. In the single-modality studies (SDTA), DCEUS consistently showed higher sensitivity for T2-T4 staging compared to enhanced CT, with comparable specificity. However, the certainty of evidence for indirect comparisons was very low, highlighting the need for further high-quality comparative studies. Overall, DCEUS appears to be a promising modality for gastric cancer T staging, particularly for early-stage detection, but the limited number of direct comparative studies underscores the need for more robust evidence.

Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that DCEUS significantly outperforms enhanced-CT in terms of SE and diagnostic accuracy for preoperative T-staging of GC, while maintaining comparable SP. However, these findings require further validation through rigorous studies with larger sample sizes and improved methodological quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信