了解斑秃患者的眉毛和睫毛受累及对Baricitinib治疗的反应性。

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Arash Mostaghimi, Brittany Craiglow, Brett King, Jerry Shapiro, Justin Ko, Antonella Tosti, Manabu Ohyama, Yiying Brogan, Guanglei Yu, Angelina Sontag, Najwa Somani
{"title":"了解斑秃患者的眉毛和睫毛受累及对Baricitinib治疗的反应性。","authors":"Arash Mostaghimi, Brittany Craiglow, Brett King, Jerry Shapiro, Justin Ko, Antonella Tosti, Manabu Ohyama, Yiying Brogan, Guanglei Yu, Angelina Sontag, Najwa Somani","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eyebrow and eyelash (EB/EL) involvement is an important consideration in the assessment of alopecia areata (AA) severity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We report integrated results from BRAVE-AA1 (NCT03570749) and BRAVE-AA2 (NCT03899259) characterising EB/EL involvement at baseline in patients with AA and response to baricitinib treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BRAVE-AA1 and BRAVE-AA2 were randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted at 169 centres in 10 countries. Patients were randomised to placebo, baricitinib 2 mg, or baricitinib 4 mg. Pooled data from patients continually treated with baricitinib through Week 52 were included. Outcomes were assessed using the Clinician-Reported Outcome (ClinRO) measure for EB/EL and Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score for scalp.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, patients with more severe EB/EL involvement had more severe scalp hair loss, with mean SALT scores ranging from 70.6 to 96.0 for patients with no gaps to complete absence of hair, respectively, at EB/EL sites. EB/EL response rates [ClinRO (0,1) with ≥1-point improvement] at Week 36 were significantly higher in patients treated with both baricitinib 2 mg (28.2%, odds ratio [OR]=3.27, 25.1% OR=2.95) and baricitinib 4 mg (44.3% OR=6.84, 46.4% OR=8.21) as compared with placebo (12.6%, 12.4%). There was high concordance between EB response and EL response, with approximately 80% of patients who achieved hair regrowth at one site, achieving regrowth at the other with baricitinib 4 mg. Among scalp responders (SALT score <20 at Week 52), 78.5% and 82.6% achieved an EB and EL response, respectively, and 71.1% of patients achieved a response in both EB and EL with baricitinib 4 mg. Among scalp nonresponders (SALT score >20 at Week 52), 46.7% and 48.7% achieved EB and EL responses, respectively, and 35.4% achieved responses in both EB and EL. Similar trends but lower response rates were observed with baricitinib 2 mg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline severity of EB/EL involvement parallels that of the scalp. Baricitinib was efficacious in achieving holistic response across all three hair-bearing sites in a majority of Week 52 scalp responders. These data detail the benefits of baricitinib across important hair-bearing sites involved in AA and highlight that individual patient treatment success should account for the totality of the clinical presentation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>BRAVE-AA1, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03570749, start date, September 24, 2018; BRAVE-AA2, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03899259, start date, July 8, 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Eyebrow and Eyelash Involvement in Patients with Alopecia Areata and Responsiveness to Treatment with Baricitinib.\",\"authors\":\"Arash Mostaghimi, Brittany Craiglow, Brett King, Jerry Shapiro, Justin Ko, Antonella Tosti, Manabu Ohyama, Yiying Brogan, Guanglei Yu, Angelina Sontag, Najwa Somani\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjd/ljaf088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eyebrow and eyelash (EB/EL) involvement is an important consideration in the assessment of alopecia areata (AA) severity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We report integrated results from BRAVE-AA1 (NCT03570749) and BRAVE-AA2 (NCT03899259) characterising EB/EL involvement at baseline in patients with AA and response to baricitinib treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BRAVE-AA1 and BRAVE-AA2 were randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted at 169 centres in 10 countries. Patients were randomised to placebo, baricitinib 2 mg, or baricitinib 4 mg. Pooled data from patients continually treated with baricitinib through Week 52 were included. Outcomes were assessed using the Clinician-Reported Outcome (ClinRO) measure for EB/EL and Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score for scalp.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, patients with more severe EB/EL involvement had more severe scalp hair loss, with mean SALT scores ranging from 70.6 to 96.0 for patients with no gaps to complete absence of hair, respectively, at EB/EL sites. EB/EL response rates [ClinRO (0,1) with ≥1-point improvement] at Week 36 were significantly higher in patients treated with both baricitinib 2 mg (28.2%, odds ratio [OR]=3.27, 25.1% OR=2.95) and baricitinib 4 mg (44.3% OR=6.84, 46.4% OR=8.21) as compared with placebo (12.6%, 12.4%). There was high concordance between EB response and EL response, with approximately 80% of patients who achieved hair regrowth at one site, achieving regrowth at the other with baricitinib 4 mg. Among scalp responders (SALT score <20 at Week 52), 78.5% and 82.6% achieved an EB and EL response, respectively, and 71.1% of patients achieved a response in both EB and EL with baricitinib 4 mg. Among scalp nonresponders (SALT score >20 at Week 52), 46.7% and 48.7% achieved EB and EL responses, respectively, and 35.4% achieved responses in both EB and EL. Similar trends but lower response rates were observed with baricitinib 2 mg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline severity of EB/EL involvement parallels that of the scalp. Baricitinib was efficacious in achieving holistic response across all three hair-bearing sites in a majority of Week 52 scalp responders. These data detail the benefits of baricitinib across important hair-bearing sites involved in AA and highlight that individual patient treatment success should account for the totality of the clinical presentation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>BRAVE-AA1, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03570749, start date, September 24, 2018; BRAVE-AA2, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03899259, start date, July 8, 2019.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf088\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眉毛和睫毛(EB/EL)累及是评估斑秃(AA)严重程度的重要考虑因素。目的:我们报告了BRAVE-AA1 (NCT03570749)和BRAVE-AA2 (NCT03899259)的综合结果,表征了AA患者基线时EB/EL受累和对巴西替尼治疗的反应。方法:BRAVE-AA1和BRAVE-AA2是在10个国家169个中心进行的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。患者随机分为安慰剂组、巴西替尼2mg组或巴西替尼4mg组。纳入了持续接受巴西替尼治疗至第52周的患者的汇总数据。使用临床报告结果(ClinRO)测量EB/EL和头皮脱发严重程度工具(SALT)评分来评估结果。结果:基线时,EB/EL累及更严重的患者头皮脱发更严重,EB/EL部位无间隙至完全脱发的患者平均SALT评分分别为70.6至96.0。与安慰剂(12.6%,12.4%)相比,baricitinib 2mg(28.2%,优势比[OR]=3.27, 25.1% OR=2.95)和baricitinib 4mg (44.3% OR=6.84, 46.4% OR=8.21)治疗的患者在第36周的EB/EL缓解率[ClinRO(0,1)≥1点改善]显著高于安慰剂(28.2%,优势比[OR]=3.27, 25.1% OR=2.95)。EB反应和EL反应之间有高度的一致性,大约80%的患者在一个部位实现了头发再生,baricitinib 4mg在另一个部位实现了头发再生。在头皮应答者(第52周时SALT评分为20分)中,46.7%和48.7%分别达到EB和EL反应,35.4%在EB和EL均达到反应。baricitinib 2mg组观察到类似的趋势,但反应率较低。结论:EB/EL受累的基线严重程度与头皮相似。Baricitinib在大多数第52周头皮应答者中有效地实现了所有三个发源部位的整体应答。这些数据详细说明了baricitinib在AA中涉及的重要毛发生长部位的益处,并强调了个体患者治疗的成功应该考虑到临床表现的总体。试验注册号:BRAVE-AA1, ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT03570749,开始日期:2018年9月24日;BRAVE-AA2, ClinicalTrials.gov编号NCT03899259,开始日期2019年7月8日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Eyebrow and Eyelash Involvement in Patients with Alopecia Areata and Responsiveness to Treatment with Baricitinib.

Background: Eyebrow and eyelash (EB/EL) involvement is an important consideration in the assessment of alopecia areata (AA) severity.

Objectives: We report integrated results from BRAVE-AA1 (NCT03570749) and BRAVE-AA2 (NCT03899259) characterising EB/EL involvement at baseline in patients with AA and response to baricitinib treatment.

Methods: BRAVE-AA1 and BRAVE-AA2 were randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted at 169 centres in 10 countries. Patients were randomised to placebo, baricitinib 2 mg, or baricitinib 4 mg. Pooled data from patients continually treated with baricitinib through Week 52 were included. Outcomes were assessed using the Clinician-Reported Outcome (ClinRO) measure for EB/EL and Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score for scalp.

Results: At baseline, patients with more severe EB/EL involvement had more severe scalp hair loss, with mean SALT scores ranging from 70.6 to 96.0 for patients with no gaps to complete absence of hair, respectively, at EB/EL sites. EB/EL response rates [ClinRO (0,1) with ≥1-point improvement] at Week 36 were significantly higher in patients treated with both baricitinib 2 mg (28.2%, odds ratio [OR]=3.27, 25.1% OR=2.95) and baricitinib 4 mg (44.3% OR=6.84, 46.4% OR=8.21) as compared with placebo (12.6%, 12.4%). There was high concordance between EB response and EL response, with approximately 80% of patients who achieved hair regrowth at one site, achieving regrowth at the other with baricitinib 4 mg. Among scalp responders (SALT score <20 at Week 52), 78.5% and 82.6% achieved an EB and EL response, respectively, and 71.1% of patients achieved a response in both EB and EL with baricitinib 4 mg. Among scalp nonresponders (SALT score >20 at Week 52), 46.7% and 48.7% achieved EB and EL responses, respectively, and 35.4% achieved responses in both EB and EL. Similar trends but lower response rates were observed with baricitinib 2 mg.

Conclusions: Baseline severity of EB/EL involvement parallels that of the scalp. Baricitinib was efficacious in achieving holistic response across all three hair-bearing sites in a majority of Week 52 scalp responders. These data detail the benefits of baricitinib across important hair-bearing sites involved in AA and highlight that individual patient treatment success should account for the totality of the clinical presentation.

Trial registration number: BRAVE-AA1, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03570749, start date, September 24, 2018; BRAVE-AA2, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03899259, start date, July 8, 2019.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信