饲养场牛呼吸道疾病疫苗随机对照试验报告不完整。

IF 1.3 3区农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES

American journal of veterinary research Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0389

Sarah C Totton, Jan M Sargeant, Annette M O'Connor

{"title":"饲养场牛呼吸道疾病疫苗随机对照试验报告不完整。","authors":"Sarah C Totton, Jan M Sargeant, Annette M O'Connor","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated bovine respiratory disease vaccine trials in feedlot cattle and found that most (19 of 34 [56%]) publications (describing 26 of 43 [60%] trials) labeled the control group as \"unvaccinated\" or similar terms even when all cattle in the trial received vaccine(s) at feedlot arrival. Additionally, 38 of 44 (86%) publications (describing 31 of 53 [58%] trials) reported statistical comparisons of bovine respiratory disease vaccines that did not mention the respiratory vaccines that all cattle received at feedlot arrival. Trial authors should report animal health products given to all cattle in a trial, in the abstract, methods, and results sections, to prevent misinterpretation of the actual comparisons investigated.","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incomplete reporting in randomized controlled trials of bovine respiratory disease vaccines in feedlot cattle.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C Totton, Jan M Sargeant, Annette M O'Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We evaluated bovine respiratory disease vaccine trials in feedlot cattle and found that most (19 of 34 [56%]) publications (describing 26 of 43 [60%] trials) labeled the control group as \\\"unvaccinated\\\" or similar terms even when all cattle in the trial received vaccine(s) at feedlot arrival. Additionally, 38 of 44 (86%) publications (describing 31 of 53 [58%] trials) reported statistical comparisons of bovine respiratory disease vaccines that did not mention the respiratory vaccines that all cattle received at feedlot arrival. Trial authors should report animal health products given to all cattle in a trial, in the abstract, methods, and results sections, to prevent misinterpretation of the actual comparisons investigated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0389\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对饲养场牛的牛呼吸道疾病疫苗试验进行了评估，发现大多数（34 篇论文中的 19 篇 [56%]，43 项试验中的 26 项 [60%]）论文（描述了 43 项试验中的 26 项 [60%]）将对照组标为 "未接种疫苗 "或类似术语，即使试验中的所有牛在到达饲养场时都接种了疫苗。此外，44 份出版物中有 38 份（86%）（描述了 53 项试验中的 31 项 [58%]）报告了牛呼吸道疾病疫苗的统计比较，但未提及所有牛在到达饲养场时都接种了呼吸道疫苗。试验作者应在摘要、方法和结果部分报告试验中给所有牛使用的动物保健产品，以防止对实际调查的比较结果产生误解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Incomplete reporting in randomized controlled trials of bovine respiratory disease vaccines in feedlot cattle.

We evaluated bovine respiratory disease vaccine trials in feedlot cattle and found that most (19 of 34 [56%]) publications (describing 26 of 43 [60%] trials) labeled the control group as "unvaccinated" or similar terms even when all cattle in the trial received vaccine(s) at feedlot arrival. Additionally, 38 of 44 (86%) publications (describing 31 of 53 [58%] trials) reported statistical comparisons of bovine respiratory disease vaccines that did not mention the respiratory vaccines that all cattle received at feedlot arrival. Trial authors should report animal health products given to all cattle in a trial, in the abstract, methods, and results sections, to prevent misinterpretation of the actual comparisons investigated.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American journal of veterinary research 农林科学-兽医学

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

10.00%

发文量

186

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.