Ahmed Mahmoud Hasan, Ahmed Mamdouh Abdelhamid, Mostafa Abdelrazek Ahmed, Ahmed Mahmoud Reyad
{"title":"经皮肾造瘘管与双 J 输尿管支架治疗成人非化脓性钙化性无尿症:前瞻性随机研究。","authors":"Ahmed Mahmoud Hasan, Ahmed Mamdouh Abdelhamid, Mostafa Abdelrazek Ahmed, Ahmed Mahmoud Reyad","doi":"10.1080/20905998.2024.2432703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the use of JJ and PCN tubes as initial urinary drainage methods in patients with obstructive calcular anuria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2021 and January 2024, 239 eligible patients with obstructive calcular anuria were randomly classified into two groups. Group A (JJ group) included 121 patients and group B (PCN group) included 118 patients. Laboratory data, stone characteristics, and intraoperative and postoperative data were also collected. The time needed to normalize the serum creatinine levels, postoperative complications, and quality of life scores were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The procedures had comparable success rates (86.8% vs. 90.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.9). The PCN group had a shorter operative time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the time required for serum creatinine to return to normal between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.669). Fever, haematuria, and LUTS were more evident in the JJ stent group. In the JJ group, the presence of upper ureteral stones and stone burden were risk factors for procedure failure, whereas the presence of upper ureteral stones and preoperative serum creatinine were risk factors for ureteral perforation. Mild hydronephrosis was a risk factor for procedural failure in the PCN group. Spontaneous stone passage was more common in the PCN group (<i>p</i> = 0.028). The Overall quality of life and general health scores were significantly better in the PCN group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both PCN and JJ stents had comparable success rates. PCN was associated with a lower incidence of LUTS, higher incidence of spontaneous stone passage, and better quality of life scores than the JJ stent.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"23 2","pages":"131-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous nephrostomy tube versus double J ureteric stent for the management of non-septic calcular anuria in adults: Prospective randomized study.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Mahmoud Hasan, Ahmed Mamdouh Abdelhamid, Mostafa Abdelrazek Ahmed, Ahmed Mahmoud Reyad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20905998.2024.2432703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the use of JJ and PCN tubes as initial urinary drainage methods in patients with obstructive calcular anuria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2021 and January 2024, 239 eligible patients with obstructive calcular anuria were randomly classified into two groups. Group A (JJ group) included 121 patients and group B (PCN group) included 118 patients. Laboratory data, stone characteristics, and intraoperative and postoperative data were also collected. The time needed to normalize the serum creatinine levels, postoperative complications, and quality of life scores were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The procedures had comparable success rates (86.8% vs. 90.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.9). The PCN group had a shorter operative time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the time required for serum creatinine to return to normal between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.669). Fever, haematuria, and LUTS were more evident in the JJ stent group. In the JJ group, the presence of upper ureteral stones and stone burden were risk factors for procedure failure, whereas the presence of upper ureteral stones and preoperative serum creatinine were risk factors for ureteral perforation. Mild hydronephrosis was a risk factor for procedural failure in the PCN group. Spontaneous stone passage was more common in the PCN group (<i>p</i> = 0.028). The Overall quality of life and general health scores were significantly better in the PCN group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both PCN and JJ stents had comparable success rates. PCN was associated with a lower incidence of LUTS, higher incidence of spontaneous stone passage, and better quality of life scores than the JJ stent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"131-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963175/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2024.2432703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2024.2432703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较JJ管与PCN管在梗阻性结石性无尿症患者初始引流中的应用。方法:选取2021年1月至2024年1月239例符合条件的梗阻性结石性无尿症患者,随机分为两组。A组(JJ组)121例,B组(PCN组)118例。同时收集实验室资料、结石特征、术中及术后资料。评估血清肌酐水平正常化所需的时间、术后并发症和生活质量评分。结果:手术成功率比较(86.8% vs. 90.7%;p = 0.9)。PCN组手术时间短(p p = 0.669)。JJ支架组发热、血尿、LUTS更为明显。在JJ组中,输尿管上部结石和结石负担的存在是手术失败的危险因素,而输尿管上部结石和术前血清肌酐的存在是输尿管穿孔的危险因素。轻度肾积水是PCN组手术失败的危险因素。PCN组自发性结石通多见(p = 0.028)。PCN组患者的总体生活质量和总体健康评分明显优于JJ组(p)。与JJ支架相比,PCN与更低的LUTS发生率、更高的自发性结石通过发生率以及更好的生活质量评分相关。
Percutaneous nephrostomy tube versus double J ureteric stent for the management of non-septic calcular anuria in adults: Prospective randomized study.
Objective: To compare the use of JJ and PCN tubes as initial urinary drainage methods in patients with obstructive calcular anuria.
Methods: Between January 2021 and January 2024, 239 eligible patients with obstructive calcular anuria were randomly classified into two groups. Group A (JJ group) included 121 patients and group B (PCN group) included 118 patients. Laboratory data, stone characteristics, and intraoperative and postoperative data were also collected. The time needed to normalize the serum creatinine levels, postoperative complications, and quality of life scores were assessed.
Results: The procedures had comparable success rates (86.8% vs. 90.7%; p = 0.9). The PCN group had a shorter operative time (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the time required for serum creatinine to return to normal between the two groups (p = 0.669). Fever, haematuria, and LUTS were more evident in the JJ stent group. In the JJ group, the presence of upper ureteral stones and stone burden were risk factors for procedure failure, whereas the presence of upper ureteral stones and preoperative serum creatinine were risk factors for ureteral perforation. Mild hydronephrosis was a risk factor for procedural failure in the PCN group. Spontaneous stone passage was more common in the PCN group (p = 0.028). The Overall quality of life and general health scores were significantly better in the PCN group (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Both PCN and JJ stents had comparable success rates. PCN was associated with a lower incidence of LUTS, higher incidence of spontaneous stone passage, and better quality of life scores than the JJ stent.
期刊介绍:
The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.