水准?了解英国维持托儿所部门的衰落

IF 3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kitty Stewart, Ludovica Gambaro, Mary Reader
{"title":"水准?了解英国维持托儿所部门的衰落","authors":"Kitty Stewart,&nbsp;Ludovica Gambaro,&nbsp;Mary Reader","doi":"10.1002/berj.4104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Early education provision in the state-maintained sector has historically played an important role in ensuring equitable access to high-quality early education in England. These settings have higher qualification requirements than other providers, and as they have been concentrated in areas of higher disadvantage, children from lower income households have been more likely to attend them. This paper shows that this phenomenon is changing: children from lower income households are considerably less likely to attend maintained settings than they were in 2010. Their higher likelihood compared with other children is also declining, while the share attending private nursery settings has increased sharply. Using the National Pupil Database, the paper explores the reasons why, identifying three main factors: a general decline in maintained provision across the country, probably linked to changes in national funding practices; changes in the geography of poverty; and the extension of free early education places to disadvantaged 2-year-olds, which inadvertently led to children entering and remaining in lower quality settings. The paper illustrates the inherent trade-off policymakers face between expanding early childhood education and care provision and maintaining the quality necessary for services to function as social investment. It contributes both to early childhood education and care policy studies in England and to the wider international literature on mixed economy approaches to early childhood education and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51410,"journal":{"name":"British Educational Research Journal","volume":"51 2","pages":"1009-1038"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/berj.4104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levelling down? Understanding the decline of the maintained nursery sector in England\",\"authors\":\"Kitty Stewart,&nbsp;Ludovica Gambaro,&nbsp;Mary Reader\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/berj.4104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Early education provision in the state-maintained sector has historically played an important role in ensuring equitable access to high-quality early education in England. These settings have higher qualification requirements than other providers, and as they have been concentrated in areas of higher disadvantage, children from lower income households have been more likely to attend them. This paper shows that this phenomenon is changing: children from lower income households are considerably less likely to attend maintained settings than they were in 2010. Their higher likelihood compared with other children is also declining, while the share attending private nursery settings has increased sharply. Using the National Pupil Database, the paper explores the reasons why, identifying three main factors: a general decline in maintained provision across the country, probably linked to changes in national funding practices; changes in the geography of poverty; and the extension of free early education places to disadvantaged 2-year-olds, which inadvertently led to children entering and remaining in lower quality settings. The paper illustrates the inherent trade-off policymakers face between expanding early childhood education and care provision and maintaining the quality necessary for services to function as social investment. It contributes both to early childhood education and care policy studies in England and to the wider international literature on mixed economy approaches to early childhood education and care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Educational Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"1009-1038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/berj.4104\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Educational Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.4104\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.4104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

历史上,国家维持的早期教育部门在确保公平获得高质量早期教育方面发挥了重要作用。这些机构比其他机构有更高的资格要求,由于它们集中在处境更加不利的地区,来自低收入家庭的儿童更有可能进入这些机构。这篇论文表明,这一现象正在发生变化:与2010年相比,低收入家庭的儿童进入维护机构的可能性大大降低。与其他孩子相比,他们上私立幼儿园的可能性也在下降,而上私立幼儿园的比例急剧上升。利用国家学生数据库,本文探讨了原因,确定了三个主要因素:全国范围内维持供应的普遍下降,可能与国家资助实践的变化有关;贫困地区的变化;将免费早教名额扩大到2岁的弱势儿童,这无意中导致孩子们进入并留在低质量的环境中。本文阐述了政策制定者在扩大幼儿教育和保育提供与保持服务作为社会投资所必需的质量之间面临的内在权衡。它既有助于英国的幼儿教育和护理政策研究,也有助于更广泛的关于幼儿教育和护理的混合经济方法的国际文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Levelling down? Understanding the decline of the maintained nursery sector in England

Levelling down? Understanding the decline of the maintained nursery sector in England

Early education provision in the state-maintained sector has historically played an important role in ensuring equitable access to high-quality early education in England. These settings have higher qualification requirements than other providers, and as they have been concentrated in areas of higher disadvantage, children from lower income households have been more likely to attend them. This paper shows that this phenomenon is changing: children from lower income households are considerably less likely to attend maintained settings than they were in 2010. Their higher likelihood compared with other children is also declining, while the share attending private nursery settings has increased sharply. Using the National Pupil Database, the paper explores the reasons why, identifying three main factors: a general decline in maintained provision across the country, probably linked to changes in national funding practices; changes in the geography of poverty; and the extension of free early education places to disadvantaged 2-year-olds, which inadvertently led to children entering and remaining in lower quality settings. The paper illustrates the inherent trade-off policymakers face between expanding early childhood education and care provision and maintaining the quality necessary for services to function as social investment. It contributes both to early childhood education and care policy studies in England and to the wider international literature on mixed economy approaches to early childhood education and care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Educational Research Journal
British Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The British Educational Research Journal is an international peer reviewed medium for the publication of articles of interest to researchers in education and has rapidly become a major focal point for the publication of educational research from throughout the world. For further information on the association please visit the British Educational Research Association web site. The journal is interdisciplinary in approach, and includes reports of case studies, experiments and surveys, discussions of conceptual and methodological issues and of underlying assumptions in educational research, accounts of research in progress, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信