北美温室气体预算:北美温室气体预算:二氧化碳、甲烷和氧化亚氮的排放量、清除量和整合(2010-2019 年):第二次区域碳循环评估与过程研究(RECCAP2)的结果

IF 5.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Benjamin Poulter, Guillermo Murray-Tortarolo, Daniel J. Hayes, Philippe Ciais, Robbie M. Andrew, Ana Bastos, Brendan Byrne, David Butman, Josep G. Canadell, Abhishek Chatterjee, Grant Domke, Andrew Feldman, Kelsey Foster, Neha Hunka, Robert B. Jackson, Werner A. Kurz, Ayia Lindquist, Maodian Liu, Ingrid Luijkx, Arnaud Mialon, Anna M. Michalak, John Miller, Wolfgang A. Obermeier, Naiqin Pan, James T. Randerson, Peter A. Raymond, Pierre Regnier, Laure Resplandy, Gerard Rocher-Ros, Nemesio Rodriquez-Fernandez, Judith Rosentreter, Julio César Salazar-Neira, Suzanne E. Tank, Hanqin Tian, Rodrigo Vargas, Yohanna Villalobos, Jonathan A. Wang, Xinyuan Wei, Kimberly P. Wickland, Christopher Williams, Lisamarie Windham-Myers, Christopher Woodall, Qing Ying, Zhen Zhang
{"title":"北美温室气体预算:北美温室气体预算:二氧化碳、甲烷和氧化亚氮的排放量、清除量和整合(2010-2019 年):第二次区域碳循环评估与过程研究(RECCAP2)的结果","authors":"Benjamin Poulter,&nbsp;Guillermo Murray-Tortarolo,&nbsp;Daniel J. Hayes,&nbsp;Philippe Ciais,&nbsp;Robbie M. Andrew,&nbsp;Ana Bastos,&nbsp;Brendan Byrne,&nbsp;David Butman,&nbsp;Josep G. Canadell,&nbsp;Abhishek Chatterjee,&nbsp;Grant Domke,&nbsp;Andrew Feldman,&nbsp;Kelsey Foster,&nbsp;Neha Hunka,&nbsp;Robert B. Jackson,&nbsp;Werner A. Kurz,&nbsp;Ayia Lindquist,&nbsp;Maodian Liu,&nbsp;Ingrid Luijkx,&nbsp;Arnaud Mialon,&nbsp;Anna M. Michalak,&nbsp;John Miller,&nbsp;Wolfgang A. Obermeier,&nbsp;Naiqin Pan,&nbsp;James T. Randerson,&nbsp;Peter A. Raymond,&nbsp;Pierre Regnier,&nbsp;Laure Resplandy,&nbsp;Gerard Rocher-Ros,&nbsp;Nemesio Rodriquez-Fernandez,&nbsp;Judith Rosentreter,&nbsp;Julio César Salazar-Neira,&nbsp;Suzanne E. Tank,&nbsp;Hanqin Tian,&nbsp;Rodrigo Vargas,&nbsp;Yohanna Villalobos,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Wang,&nbsp;Xinyuan Wei,&nbsp;Kimberly P. Wickland,&nbsp;Christopher Williams,&nbsp;Lisamarie Windham-Myers,&nbsp;Christopher Woodall,&nbsp;Qing Ying,&nbsp;Zhen Zhang","doi":"10.1029/2024GB008310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate accounting of greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions and removals is central to tracking progress toward climate mitigation and for monitoring potential climate-change feedbacks. GHG budgeting and reporting can follow either the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change methodologies for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory (NGHGI) reporting or use atmospheric-based “top-down” (TD) inversions or process-based “bottom-up” (BU) approaches. To help understand and reconcile these approaches, the Second REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes study (RECCAP2) was established to quantify GHG emissions and removals for carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), for ten-land and five-ocean regions for 2010–2019. Here, we present the results for the North American land region (Canada, the United States, Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean). For 2010–2019, the NGHGI reported total net-GHG emissions of 7,270 TgCO<sub>2</sub>-eq yr<sup>−1</sup> compared to TD estimates of 6,132 ± 1,846 TgCO<sub>2</sub>-eq yr<sup>−1</sup> and BU estimates of 9,060 ± 898 TgCO<sub>2</sub>-eq yr<sup>−1</sup>. Reconciling differences between the NGHGI, TD and BU approaches depended on (a) accounting for lateral fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> along the land-ocean-aquatic continuum (LOAC) and trade, (b) correcting land-use CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for the loss-of-additional-sink capacity (LASC), (c) avoiding double counting of inland water CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, and (d) adjusting area estimates to match the NGHGI definition of the managed-land proxy. Uncertainties remain from inland-water CO<sub>2</sub> evasion, the conversion of nitrogen fertilizers to N<sub>2</sub>O, and from less-frequent NGHGI reporting from non-Annex-1 countries. The RECCAP2 framework plays a key role in reconciling independent GHG-reporting methodologies to support policy commitments while providing insights into biogeochemical processes and responses to climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008310","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The North American Greenhouse Gas Budget: Emissions, Removals, and Integration for CO2, CH4, and N2O (2010–2019): Results From the Second REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Study (RECCAP2)\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Poulter,&nbsp;Guillermo Murray-Tortarolo,&nbsp;Daniel J. Hayes,&nbsp;Philippe Ciais,&nbsp;Robbie M. Andrew,&nbsp;Ana Bastos,&nbsp;Brendan Byrne,&nbsp;David Butman,&nbsp;Josep G. Canadell,&nbsp;Abhishek Chatterjee,&nbsp;Grant Domke,&nbsp;Andrew Feldman,&nbsp;Kelsey Foster,&nbsp;Neha Hunka,&nbsp;Robert B. Jackson,&nbsp;Werner A. Kurz,&nbsp;Ayia Lindquist,&nbsp;Maodian Liu,&nbsp;Ingrid Luijkx,&nbsp;Arnaud Mialon,&nbsp;Anna M. Michalak,&nbsp;John Miller,&nbsp;Wolfgang A. Obermeier,&nbsp;Naiqin Pan,&nbsp;James T. Randerson,&nbsp;Peter A. Raymond,&nbsp;Pierre Regnier,&nbsp;Laure Resplandy,&nbsp;Gerard Rocher-Ros,&nbsp;Nemesio Rodriquez-Fernandez,&nbsp;Judith Rosentreter,&nbsp;Julio César Salazar-Neira,&nbsp;Suzanne E. Tank,&nbsp;Hanqin Tian,&nbsp;Rodrigo Vargas,&nbsp;Yohanna Villalobos,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Wang,&nbsp;Xinyuan Wei,&nbsp;Kimberly P. Wickland,&nbsp;Christopher Williams,&nbsp;Lisamarie Windham-Myers,&nbsp;Christopher Woodall,&nbsp;Qing Ying,&nbsp;Zhen Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GB008310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate accounting of greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions and removals is central to tracking progress toward climate mitigation and for monitoring potential climate-change feedbacks. GHG budgeting and reporting can follow either the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change methodologies for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory (NGHGI) reporting or use atmospheric-based “top-down” (TD) inversions or process-based “bottom-up” (BU) approaches. To help understand and reconcile these approaches, the Second REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes study (RECCAP2) was established to quantify GHG emissions and removals for carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), for ten-land and five-ocean regions for 2010–2019. Here, we present the results for the North American land region (Canada, the United States, Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean). For 2010–2019, the NGHGI reported total net-GHG emissions of 7,270 TgCO<sub>2</sub>-eq yr<sup>−1</sup> compared to TD estimates of 6,132 ± 1,846 TgCO<sub>2</sub>-eq yr<sup>−1</sup> and BU estimates of 9,060 ± 898 TgCO<sub>2</sub>-eq yr<sup>−1</sup>. Reconciling differences between the NGHGI, TD and BU approaches depended on (a) accounting for lateral fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> along the land-ocean-aquatic continuum (LOAC) and trade, (b) correcting land-use CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for the loss-of-additional-sink capacity (LASC), (c) avoiding double counting of inland water CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, and (d) adjusting area estimates to match the NGHGI definition of the managed-land proxy. Uncertainties remain from inland-water CO<sub>2</sub> evasion, the conversion of nitrogen fertilizers to N<sub>2</sub>O, and from less-frequent NGHGI reporting from non-Annex-1 countries. The RECCAP2 framework plays a key role in reconciling independent GHG-reporting methodologies to support policy commitments while providing insights into biogeochemical processes and responses to climate change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008310\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008310\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对温室气体(GHG)排放和清除的准确核算对于跟踪气候减缓进展和监测潜在的气候变化反馈至关重要。温室气体预算编制和报告可以遵循政府间气候变化专门委员会国家温室气体清单(NGHGI)报告方法,也可以使用基于大气的“自上而下”(TD)反演或基于过程的“自下而上”(BU)方法。为了帮助理解和协调这些方法,建立了第二次区域碳循环评估和过程研究(RECCAP2),以量化2010-2019年十陆五大洋区域的二氧化碳(CO2)、甲烷(CH4)和氧化亚氮(N2O)的温室气体排放和清除。在这里,我们展示了北美陆地地区(加拿大、美国、墨西哥、中美洲和加勒比地区)的结果。2010-2019年,NGHGI报告的温室气体净排放总量为7270 tgco2当量年- 1,而TD估计为6132±1846 tgco2当量年- 1,BU估计为9060±898 tgco2当量年- 1。调和NGHGI、TD和BU方法之间的差异取决于(a)计算沿陆地-海洋-水生连续体(LOAC)和贸易的CO2横向通量,(b)校正土地利用CO2排放的额外汇容量损失(LASC), (c)避免重复计算内陆水CH4排放,以及(d)调整面积估算以符合NGHGI对管理土地代理的定义。内陆水域的二氧化碳逃逸、氮肥向一氧化二氮的转化以及非附件1国家较不频繁的温室气体排放指数报告仍然存在不确定性。RECCAP2框架在协调独立的温室气体报告方法以支持政策承诺方面发挥着关键作用,同时提供对生物地球化学过程和气候变化响应的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The North American Greenhouse Gas Budget: Emissions, Removals, and Integration for CO2, CH4, and N2O (2010–2019): Results From the Second REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Study (RECCAP2)

The North American Greenhouse Gas Budget: Emissions, Removals, and Integration for CO2, CH4, and N2O (2010–2019): Results From the Second REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Study (RECCAP2)

Accurate accounting of greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions and removals is central to tracking progress toward climate mitigation and for monitoring potential climate-change feedbacks. GHG budgeting and reporting can follow either the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change methodologies for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory (NGHGI) reporting or use atmospheric-based “top-down” (TD) inversions or process-based “bottom-up” (BU) approaches. To help understand and reconcile these approaches, the Second REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes study (RECCAP2) was established to quantify GHG emissions and removals for carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), for ten-land and five-ocean regions for 2010–2019. Here, we present the results for the North American land region (Canada, the United States, Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean). For 2010–2019, the NGHGI reported total net-GHG emissions of 7,270 TgCO2-eq yr−1 compared to TD estimates of 6,132 ± 1,846 TgCO2-eq yr−1 and BU estimates of 9,060 ± 898 TgCO2-eq yr−1. Reconciling differences between the NGHGI, TD and BU approaches depended on (a) accounting for lateral fluxes of CO2 along the land-ocean-aquatic continuum (LOAC) and trade, (b) correcting land-use CO2 emissions for the loss-of-additional-sink capacity (LASC), (c) avoiding double counting of inland water CH4 emissions, and (d) adjusting area estimates to match the NGHGI definition of the managed-land proxy. Uncertainties remain from inland-water CO2 evasion, the conversion of nitrogen fertilizers to N2O, and from less-frequent NGHGI reporting from non-Annex-1 countries. The RECCAP2 framework plays a key role in reconciling independent GHG-reporting methodologies to support policy commitments while providing insights into biogeochemical processes and responses to climate change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信