{"title":"Omalizumab和dupilumab联合使用:来自大型学术中心的安全性和有效性数据","authors":"Isabel C. Silva, Rachel Daher, Saakshi Khattri","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04196-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory skin conditions. Omalizumab is a biologic used for the treatment of asthma and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), while Dupilumab is used for the treatment of Th2 pathway mediated diseases like atopic dermatitis (AD). Patients can present with concurrent immune-mediated conditions requiring the use of dual biologic therapy; however, there is no robust data to support this. We conducted a retrospective review of outpatient charts between January 2018– July 2024 at a large academic center to find patients with concurrent use of Omalizumab and Dupilumab. Diagnoses and indications for treatments, prior therapies, therapy regimen, therapy duration, adverse events, and new medications were recorded. There were 23 patients prescribed dual biologic therapy. The most common indication for omalizumab was CIU (<i>n</i> = 14) while for dupilumab was AD (<i>n</i> = 20). The median duration of dual therapy was 7 months, with a range of 1 to 41 months. The patient with the longest record of dual therapy was 41 months, with no severe adverse events and a robust clinical response. Of the 23 patients, 65% (<i>n</i> = 15) are currently continuing treatment. Of the 8 patients who discontinued therapy, the reasons included adverse events (<i>n</i> = 2), lack of response (<i>n</i> = 2), insurance issues (<i>n</i> = 1), and switch to monotherapy after improvement (<i>n</i> = 2). Most patients treated with dual therapy were able to obtain improvement for both conditions prescribed. This study showed real-world safety and efficacy of combination of Omalizumab and Dupilumab. Limitations of our study include a small sample size, a one-year average follow-up period, and its retrospective nature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined use of Omalizumab and dupilumab: safety and efficacy data from a large academic center\",\"authors\":\"Isabel C. Silva, Rachel Daher, Saakshi Khattri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00403-025-04196-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory skin conditions. Omalizumab is a biologic used for the treatment of asthma and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), while Dupilumab is used for the treatment of Th2 pathway mediated diseases like atopic dermatitis (AD). Patients can present with concurrent immune-mediated conditions requiring the use of dual biologic therapy; however, there is no robust data to support this. We conducted a retrospective review of outpatient charts between January 2018– July 2024 at a large academic center to find patients with concurrent use of Omalizumab and Dupilumab. Diagnoses and indications for treatments, prior therapies, therapy regimen, therapy duration, adverse events, and new medications were recorded. There were 23 patients prescribed dual biologic therapy. The most common indication for omalizumab was CIU (<i>n</i> = 14) while for dupilumab was AD (<i>n</i> = 20). The median duration of dual therapy was 7 months, with a range of 1 to 41 months. The patient with the longest record of dual therapy was 41 months, with no severe adverse events and a robust clinical response. Of the 23 patients, 65% (<i>n</i> = 15) are currently continuing treatment. Of the 8 patients who discontinued therapy, the reasons included adverse events (<i>n</i> = 2), lack of response (<i>n</i> = 2), insurance issues (<i>n</i> = 1), and switch to monotherapy after improvement (<i>n</i> = 2). Most patients treated with dual therapy were able to obtain improvement for both conditions prescribed. This study showed real-world safety and efficacy of combination of Omalizumab and Dupilumab. Limitations of our study include a small sample size, a one-year average follow-up period, and its retrospective nature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04196-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04196-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combined use of Omalizumab and dupilumab: safety and efficacy data from a large academic center
Biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory skin conditions. Omalizumab is a biologic used for the treatment of asthma and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), while Dupilumab is used for the treatment of Th2 pathway mediated diseases like atopic dermatitis (AD). Patients can present with concurrent immune-mediated conditions requiring the use of dual biologic therapy; however, there is no robust data to support this. We conducted a retrospective review of outpatient charts between January 2018– July 2024 at a large academic center to find patients with concurrent use of Omalizumab and Dupilumab. Diagnoses and indications for treatments, prior therapies, therapy regimen, therapy duration, adverse events, and new medications were recorded. There were 23 patients prescribed dual biologic therapy. The most common indication for omalizumab was CIU (n = 14) while for dupilumab was AD (n = 20). The median duration of dual therapy was 7 months, with a range of 1 to 41 months. The patient with the longest record of dual therapy was 41 months, with no severe adverse events and a robust clinical response. Of the 23 patients, 65% (n = 15) are currently continuing treatment. Of the 8 patients who discontinued therapy, the reasons included adverse events (n = 2), lack of response (n = 2), insurance issues (n = 1), and switch to monotherapy after improvement (n = 2). Most patients treated with dual therapy were able to obtain improvement for both conditions prescribed. This study showed real-world safety and efficacy of combination of Omalizumab and Dupilumab. Limitations of our study include a small sample size, a one-year average follow-up period, and its retrospective nature.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.