Ana María Ezquerra-García RN , María de la O. Casamayor-Lerena RN
{"title":"使用心脏停止板与胸部按压质量之间的关系","authors":"Ana María Ezquerra-García RN , María de la O. Casamayor-Lerena RN","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2025.500542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effectiveness of the backboard in cardiopulmonary resuscitation has not been established although it is recommended to perform compressions on a firm surface.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the relationship between the use of the backboard and the depth of chest compressions. To know the preference of rescuers when performing chest compressions without or with backboard.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>Single-blind, experimental study with paired data. All staff of healthcare workers in the Intensive Care Unit performed 2<!--> <!-->one-minute simulations of uninterrupted chest compressions, one without and one with a backboard. The quality of the chest compressions was valued: Rate, depth, complete chest release and compression, performed with and without backboard. The placement of the backboard was simply randomized at the first measurement. The subjects were unaware of the difference between the 2<!--> <!-->scenarios. Participation was voluntary. Two analyzes were performed with paired Student's t-test: one analyzing the order of measurement and the other in relation to the presence or absence of the backboard.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy-one workers (87.6%) of the staff participated. The presence of the backboard was associated with an increase in the average depth (47.99<!--> <!-->mm vs. 48.99<!--> <!-->mm, P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.008 and the percentage of compression<!--> <!-->> 50<!--> <!-->mm (63.65 vs. 76.17, P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002. When analyzing the simulation order, an increase in the frequency of chest compressions was observed in the second measurement (131.14 vs. 135.03, P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009). Participants had no preference between the 2<!--> <!-->simulations (P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.749).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The backboard as a hard plane increases the mean depth and percentage of chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on hospital mattress without affecting complete chest release or rate. The rescuers do not perceive the presence of the backboard, and there is not preference in its execution without or with a backboard.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43993,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Intensiva","volume":"36 3","pages":"Article 500542"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relación entre el uso de la tabla de parada cardiaca y la calidad de las compresiones torácicas\",\"authors\":\"Ana María Ezquerra-García RN , María de la O. Casamayor-Lerena RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfi.2025.500542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The effectiveness of the backboard in cardiopulmonary resuscitation has not been established although it is recommended to perform compressions on a firm surface.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the relationship between the use of the backboard and the depth of chest compressions. To know the preference of rescuers when performing chest compressions without or with backboard.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>Single-blind, experimental study with paired data. All staff of healthcare workers in the Intensive Care Unit performed 2<!--> <!-->one-minute simulations of uninterrupted chest compressions, one without and one with a backboard. The quality of the chest compressions was valued: Rate, depth, complete chest release and compression, performed with and without backboard. The placement of the backboard was simply randomized at the first measurement. The subjects were unaware of the difference between the 2<!--> <!-->scenarios. Participation was voluntary. Two analyzes were performed with paired Student's t-test: one analyzing the order of measurement and the other in relation to the presence or absence of the backboard.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy-one workers (87.6%) of the staff participated. The presence of the backboard was associated with an increase in the average depth (47.99<!--> <!-->mm vs. 48.99<!--> <!-->mm, P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.008 and the percentage of compression<!--> <!-->> 50<!--> <!-->mm (63.65 vs. 76.17, P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002. When analyzing the simulation order, an increase in the frequency of chest compressions was observed in the second measurement (131.14 vs. 135.03, P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009). Participants had no preference between the 2<!--> <!-->simulations (P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.749).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The backboard as a hard plane increases the mean depth and percentage of chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on hospital mattress without affecting complete chest release or rate. The rescuers do not perceive the presence of the backboard, and there is not preference in its execution without or with a backboard.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria Intensiva\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 500542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria Intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239925000379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239925000379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然建议在坚硬的表面上按压,但背板在心肺复苏中的有效性尚未得到证实。目的探讨胸外按压深度与背板使用的关系。了解施救者在进行胸外按压时的偏好。方法采用配对数据的单盲实验研究。重症监护室的所有医护人员进行了2次一分钟的不间断胸外按压模拟,一次不带背板,一次带背板。评估胸外按压的质量:频率、深度、完全胸部释放和按压,有无背板进行。在第一次测量时,篮板的位置只是随机的。受试者没有意识到这两种场景之间的差异。参与是自愿的。使用配对学生t检验进行了两项分析:一项分析测量顺序,另一项分析与背板存在与否有关。结果71名职工(87.6%)参与了调查。背板的存在与平均深度的增加(47.99 mm vs. 48.99 mm, P = 0.008)和压缩率>;63.65 vs. 76.17, P = 0.002。在分析模拟顺序时,在第二次测量中观察到胸外按压频率增加(131.14 vs. 135.03, P = 0.009)。参与者在两种模拟之间没有偏好(P = 0.749)。结论在医院床垫上进行心肺复苏时,背板作为硬平面增加了胸腔按压的平均深度和比例,但不影响完全胸部释放或完全胸部释放率。救援者无法感知到篮板的存在,并且在没有篮板或有篮板的情况下执行没有偏好。
Relación entre el uso de la tabla de parada cardiaca y la calidad de las compresiones torácicas
The effectiveness of the backboard in cardiopulmonary resuscitation has not been established although it is recommended to perform compressions on a firm surface.
Objectives
To determine the relationship between the use of the backboard and the depth of chest compressions. To know the preference of rescuers when performing chest compressions without or with backboard.
Methodology
Single-blind, experimental study with paired data. All staff of healthcare workers in the Intensive Care Unit performed 2 one-minute simulations of uninterrupted chest compressions, one without and one with a backboard. The quality of the chest compressions was valued: Rate, depth, complete chest release and compression, performed with and without backboard. The placement of the backboard was simply randomized at the first measurement. The subjects were unaware of the difference between the 2 scenarios. Participation was voluntary. Two analyzes were performed with paired Student's t-test: one analyzing the order of measurement and the other in relation to the presence or absence of the backboard.
Results
Seventy-one workers (87.6%) of the staff participated. The presence of the backboard was associated with an increase in the average depth (47.99 mm vs. 48.99 mm, P = 0.008 and the percentage of compression > 50 mm (63.65 vs. 76.17, P = 0.002. When analyzing the simulation order, an increase in the frequency of chest compressions was observed in the second measurement (131.14 vs. 135.03, P = 0.009). Participants had no preference between the 2 simulations (P = 0.749).
Conclusions
The backboard as a hard plane increases the mean depth and percentage of chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on hospital mattress without affecting complete chest release or rate. The rescuers do not perceive the presence of the backboard, and there is not preference in its execution without or with a backboard.
期刊介绍:
Enfermería Intensiva es el medio de comunicación por antonomasia para todos los profesionales de enfermería españoles que desarrollan su actividad profesional en las unidades de cuidados intensivos o en cualquier otro lugar donde se atiende al paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva publica cuatro números al año, cuyos temas son específicos para la enfermería de cuidados intensivos. Es la única publicación en español con carácter nacional y está indexada en prestigiosas bases de datos como International Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Índice de Enfermería, Cuiden, Índice Médico Español, Toxline, etc.