“对我们来说没有真正的紧迫性”:对印第安纳波利斯地区黑人社区阿片类药物过量反应生活经验的批判性话语分析

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dong-Chul Seo , Leonardo Alba-Lopez , Naomi Satterfield , Shin Hyung Lee , Charlotte Crabtree , Francesca Williamson
{"title":"“对我们来说没有真正的紧迫性”:对印第安纳波利斯地区黑人社区阿片类药物过量反应生活经验的批判性话语分析","authors":"Dong-Chul Seo ,&nbsp;Leonardo Alba-Lopez ,&nbsp;Naomi Satterfield ,&nbsp;Shin Hyung Lee ,&nbsp;Charlotte Crabtree ,&nbsp;Francesca Williamson","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to examine how Black communities construct their discourses about opioid overdose response from lived experiences in the Indianapolis area. We randomly selected and analyzed 20 out of 50 interviews as data saturation was reached. Our analysis was informed by critical discourse analysis (CDA) and intersectionality as an overarching framework for the interpretation process. Each interview lasted about 60 minutes and consisted of ten open-ended questions. Participants were Black residents over 18 years old, who lived in four zip code areas in Indianapolis that had the highest rates of opioid overdose deaths in the city. The interviews revealed complex ways in which Black communities in Indianapolis navigated the opioid overdose crisis. The discourses on opioid overdose response are shaped by the intersectionality of various factors, including institutionalized racism, social discrimination, and fear of mistreatment. Moreover, the normalization of inadequate opioid overdose response is exacerbated by the stereotypes on Black communities, lack of access to resources and information, and historical mistrust in healthcare and law enforcement bodies. Our findings indicate that future intervention to reduce overdose deaths in the Black communities should move away from isolated approaches to holistic ones. These should encompass various intersecting factors, including structural racism, stigma of drug use, fear of mistreatment, lack of resources, and mistrust of law enforcement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"373 ","pages":"Article 118039"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“There’s no real urgency when it comes to us”: Critical Discourse Analysis of Black Communities’ Lived Experience with Opioid Overdose Response in Indianapolis Area\",\"authors\":\"Dong-Chul Seo ,&nbsp;Leonardo Alba-Lopez ,&nbsp;Naomi Satterfield ,&nbsp;Shin Hyung Lee ,&nbsp;Charlotte Crabtree ,&nbsp;Francesca Williamson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aims to examine how Black communities construct their discourses about opioid overdose response from lived experiences in the Indianapolis area. We randomly selected and analyzed 20 out of 50 interviews as data saturation was reached. Our analysis was informed by critical discourse analysis (CDA) and intersectionality as an overarching framework for the interpretation process. Each interview lasted about 60 minutes and consisted of ten open-ended questions. Participants were Black residents over 18 years old, who lived in four zip code areas in Indianapolis that had the highest rates of opioid overdose deaths in the city. The interviews revealed complex ways in which Black communities in Indianapolis navigated the opioid overdose crisis. The discourses on opioid overdose response are shaped by the intersectionality of various factors, including institutionalized racism, social discrimination, and fear of mistreatment. Moreover, the normalization of inadequate opioid overdose response is exacerbated by the stereotypes on Black communities, lack of access to resources and information, and historical mistrust in healthcare and law enforcement bodies. Our findings indicate that future intervention to reduce overdose deaths in the Black communities should move away from isolated approaches to holistic ones. These should encompass various intersecting factors, including structural racism, stigma of drug use, fear of mistreatment, lack of resources, and mistrust of law enforcement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"373 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003697\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在研究黑人社区如何从印第安纳波利斯地区的生活经历中构建他们关于阿片类药物过量反应的话语。当数据达到饱和时,我们随机选择并分析了50个访谈中的20个。我们的分析以批评性话语分析(CDA)和交叉性作为解释过程的总体框架。每次采访持续约60分钟,包括10个开放式问题。参与者是18岁以上的黑人居民,他们居住在印第安纳波利斯的四个邮政编码地区,这些地区的阿片类药物过量死亡率最高。这些采访揭示了印第安纳波利斯黑人社区应对阿片类药物过量危机的复杂方式。关于阿片类药物过量反应的话语是由各种因素的交叉性形成的,包括制度化的种族主义、社会歧视和对虐待的恐惧。此外,对黑人社区的刻板印象、缺乏获得资源和信息的途径以及对医疗保健和执法机构的历史不信任加剧了阿片类药物过量反应不足的常态化。我们的研究结果表明,未来减少黑人社区过量死亡的干预措施应该从孤立的方法转向整体方法。这些问题应包括各种相互交织的因素,包括结构性种族主义、吸毒的耻辱、对虐待的恐惧、缺乏资源和对执法的不信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“There’s no real urgency when it comes to us”: Critical Discourse Analysis of Black Communities’ Lived Experience with Opioid Overdose Response in Indianapolis Area
This study aims to examine how Black communities construct their discourses about opioid overdose response from lived experiences in the Indianapolis area. We randomly selected and analyzed 20 out of 50 interviews as data saturation was reached. Our analysis was informed by critical discourse analysis (CDA) and intersectionality as an overarching framework for the interpretation process. Each interview lasted about 60 minutes and consisted of ten open-ended questions. Participants were Black residents over 18 years old, who lived in four zip code areas in Indianapolis that had the highest rates of opioid overdose deaths in the city. The interviews revealed complex ways in which Black communities in Indianapolis navigated the opioid overdose crisis. The discourses on opioid overdose response are shaped by the intersectionality of various factors, including institutionalized racism, social discrimination, and fear of mistreatment. Moreover, the normalization of inadequate opioid overdose response is exacerbated by the stereotypes on Black communities, lack of access to resources and information, and historical mistrust in healthcare and law enforcement bodies. Our findings indicate that future intervention to reduce overdose deaths in the Black communities should move away from isolated approaches to holistic ones. These should encompass various intersecting factors, including structural racism, stigma of drug use, fear of mistreatment, lack of resources, and mistrust of law enforcement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信