城市绿地的治理:来自三个自上而下的城市园艺项目的见解

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Slavica Čepić , Jelena Tomićević-Dubljević , Marijana Pantić , Boris Radić
{"title":"城市绿地的治理:来自三个自上而下的城市园艺项目的见解","authors":"Slavica Čepić ,&nbsp;Jelena Tomićević-Dubljević ,&nbsp;Marijana Pantić ,&nbsp;Boris Radić","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban gardens have attracted the attention of scholars, local organisations, and policymakers as they provide a valuable ground for meeting the interests of different urban actors. As a component of green infrastructure, these gardens present a challenge for managing open green spaces. This study examines urban gardening governance through case studies of three top-down programs in Malmö and Zagreb, focusing on how governance structures impact citizen participation. Using qualitative methods, including document analysis and semi-structured key informant interviews, the study provides insights into the participatory governance of these spaces, particularly from the perspective of city officers. The findings demonstrate that while cities aim to foster engagement, governance mechanisms often remain hierarchical, limiting long-term gardener participation. Local governments do assume different roles, ranging from \"leading\" to \"enabling,\" with the latter fostering more participatory governance, as seen in Malmö’s community gardens. The study also suggests that top-down programs like Zagreb’s, with dominantly leading municipal role, can evolve towards more participatory approaches over time. Additionally, it identifies challenges such as balancing enforcement of regulations with granting gardeners more autonomy and managing resource-intensive communication between local authorities and gardeners. The study suggests that urban green space governance should offer diverse models to accommodate varying citizen needs and engagement levels, from individual plot maintenance to active participation in community management. It also offers considerations on how local authorities could support citizen self-organization and involvement in top-down programs, particularly by adapting the role of green space managers to include a focus on communication and collaboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 128802"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governance of urban green spaces: Insights from three top-down urban gardening programs\",\"authors\":\"Slavica Čepić ,&nbsp;Jelena Tomićević-Dubljević ,&nbsp;Marijana Pantić ,&nbsp;Boris Radić\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban gardens have attracted the attention of scholars, local organisations, and policymakers as they provide a valuable ground for meeting the interests of different urban actors. As a component of green infrastructure, these gardens present a challenge for managing open green spaces. This study examines urban gardening governance through case studies of three top-down programs in Malmö and Zagreb, focusing on how governance structures impact citizen participation. Using qualitative methods, including document analysis and semi-structured key informant interviews, the study provides insights into the participatory governance of these spaces, particularly from the perspective of city officers. The findings demonstrate that while cities aim to foster engagement, governance mechanisms often remain hierarchical, limiting long-term gardener participation. Local governments do assume different roles, ranging from \\\"leading\\\" to \\\"enabling,\\\" with the latter fostering more participatory governance, as seen in Malmö’s community gardens. The study also suggests that top-down programs like Zagreb’s, with dominantly leading municipal role, can evolve towards more participatory approaches over time. Additionally, it identifies challenges such as balancing enforcement of regulations with granting gardeners more autonomy and managing resource-intensive communication between local authorities and gardeners. The study suggests that urban green space governance should offer diverse models to accommodate varying citizen needs and engagement levels, from individual plot maintenance to active participation in community management. It also offers considerations on how local authorities could support citizen self-organization and involvement in top-down programs, particularly by adapting the role of green space managers to include a focus on communication and collaboration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 128802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725001360\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725001360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市花园吸引了学者、地方组织和政策制定者的注意,因为它们为满足不同城市参与者的利益提供了宝贵的基础。作为绿色基础设施的组成部分,这些花园对开放绿色空间的管理提出了挑战。本研究通过对Malmö和萨格勒布三个自上而下项目的案例研究来考察城市园艺治理,重点关注治理结构如何影响公民参与。该研究采用定性方法,包括文件分析和半结构化的关键信息提供者访谈,提供了对这些空间的参与式治理的见解,特别是从城市官员的角度。研究结果表明,虽然城市的目标是促进参与,但治理机制往往仍然是等级制的,限制了园丁的长期参与。地方政府确实承担着不同的角色,从“领导”到“促成”,后者促进更多的参与性治理,如Malmö的社区花园所示。该研究还表明,像萨格勒布这样由市政主导的自上而下的项目,可以随着时间的推移向更多参与的方式发展。此外,它还指出了一些挑战,如平衡法规的执行与赋予园丁更多的自主权,以及管理地方当局和园丁之间的资源密集型沟通。该研究表明,城市绿地治理应该提供多样化的模式,以适应不同的公民需求和参与水平,从个人地块维护到积极参与社区管理。报告还就地方当局如何支持公民自组织和参与自上而下的项目提供了一些思考,特别是通过调整绿色空间管理者的角色,将重点放在沟通和协作上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governance of urban green spaces: Insights from three top-down urban gardening programs
Urban gardens have attracted the attention of scholars, local organisations, and policymakers as they provide a valuable ground for meeting the interests of different urban actors. As a component of green infrastructure, these gardens present a challenge for managing open green spaces. This study examines urban gardening governance through case studies of three top-down programs in Malmö and Zagreb, focusing on how governance structures impact citizen participation. Using qualitative methods, including document analysis and semi-structured key informant interviews, the study provides insights into the participatory governance of these spaces, particularly from the perspective of city officers. The findings demonstrate that while cities aim to foster engagement, governance mechanisms often remain hierarchical, limiting long-term gardener participation. Local governments do assume different roles, ranging from "leading" to "enabling," with the latter fostering more participatory governance, as seen in Malmö’s community gardens. The study also suggests that top-down programs like Zagreb’s, with dominantly leading municipal role, can evolve towards more participatory approaches over time. Additionally, it identifies challenges such as balancing enforcement of regulations with granting gardeners more autonomy and managing resource-intensive communication between local authorities and gardeners. The study suggests that urban green space governance should offer diverse models to accommodate varying citizen needs and engagement levels, from individual plot maintenance to active participation in community management. It also offers considerations on how local authorities could support citizen self-organization and involvement in top-down programs, particularly by adapting the role of green space managers to include a focus on communication and collaboration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信