美国医疗体系助长了医疗阴谋论:行动呼吁

Q3 Medicine
C. Bobier, J. Obeid
{"title":"美国医疗体系助长了医疗阴谋论:行动呼吁","authors":"C. Bobier,&nbsp;J. Obeid","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Medical conspiracy theories pose a public health risk and erode trust in healthcare providers. While research continues on the psychological, social, and evolutionary foundations of conspiratorial thinking, as well as on intervention strategies, less attention has been given to the role of healthcare system structures. This paper examines how the design and delivery of the U.S. healthcare system contribute to the spread of medical conspiracy theories. Using a two-pronged analytical framework, we (1) identify key features of the U.S. healthcare system and patient experience and (2) map these features onto known psychological and social drivers of conspiratorial beliefs. We argue that addressing medical conspiracy theories requires not only individual or community-level interventions but also structural reforms in healthcare. Researchers should therefore explore the feasibility and impact of systematic changes in mitigating conspiratorial thinking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The US healthcare system facilitates medical conspiracy theories: A call to action\",\"authors\":\"C. Bobier,&nbsp;J. Obeid\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Medical conspiracy theories pose a public health risk and erode trust in healthcare providers. While research continues on the psychological, social, and evolutionary foundations of conspiratorial thinking, as well as on intervention strategies, less attention has been given to the role of healthcare system structures. This paper examines how the design and delivery of the U.S. healthcare system contribute to the spread of medical conspiracy theories. Using a two-pronged analytical framework, we (1) identify key features of the U.S. healthcare system and patient experience and (2) map these features onto known psychological and social drivers of conspiratorial beliefs. We argue that addressing medical conspiracy theories requires not only individual or community-level interventions but also structural reforms in healthcare. Researchers should therefore explore the feasibility and impact of systematic changes in mitigating conspiratorial thinking.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学阴谋论对公众健康构成威胁,侵蚀了人们对医疗服务提供者的信任。虽然对阴谋思维的心理、社会和进化基础以及干预策略的研究仍在继续,但对医疗保健系统结构的作用的关注较少。本文探讨了美国医疗保健系统的设计和交付如何有助于医疗阴谋论的传播。使用双管齐下的分析框架,我们(1)确定美国医疗保健系统和患者体验的关键特征,(2)将这些特征映射到已知的阴谋论信念的心理和社会驱动因素。我们认为,解决医疗阴谋论不仅需要个人或社区层面的干预,还需要医疗保健的结构性改革。因此,研究者应该探索系统变革在减轻阴谋思想方面的可行性和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The US healthcare system facilitates medical conspiracy theories: A call to action
Medical conspiracy theories pose a public health risk and erode trust in healthcare providers. While research continues on the psychological, social, and evolutionary foundations of conspiratorial thinking, as well as on intervention strategies, less attention has been given to the role of healthcare system structures. This paper examines how the design and delivery of the U.S. healthcare system contribute to the spread of medical conspiracy theories. Using a two-pronged analytical framework, we (1) identify key features of the U.S. healthcare system and patient experience and (2) map these features onto known psychological and social drivers of conspiratorial beliefs. We argue that addressing medical conspiracy theories requires not only individual or community-level interventions but also structural reforms in healthcare. Researchers should therefore explore the feasibility and impact of systematic changes in mitigating conspiratorial thinking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信