A.C. Chiang , M.E. Olmedo Garcia , J.W. Carlisle , A. Dowlati , N. Reguart , E. Felip , P.J. Jost , N. Steeghs , R. Stec , S.M. Gadgeel , H.H. Loong , W. Jiang , A. Hamidi , A. Parkes , L. Paz-Ares
{"title":"第一周期6-8小时门诊监测与48小时住院监测塔拉他单的安全性:delphi -300期1期亚研究","authors":"A.C. Chiang , M.E. Olmedo Garcia , J.W. Carlisle , A. Dowlati , N. Reguart , E. Felip , P.J. Jost , N. Steeghs , R. Stec , S.M. Gadgeel , H.H. Loong , W. Jiang , A. Hamidi , A. Parkes , L. Paz-Ares","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3, has demonstrated promising survival outcomes in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Given the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), initial clinical trials incorporated 48-72-h inpatient monitoring in cycle 1.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with previously treated SCLC were enrolled into DeLLphi-300 part F, which evaluated the safety of tarlatamab 10 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) with 6-8-h outpatient monitoring following cycle 1 doses. The primary endpoint, safety, was compared with patients from DeLLphi-300 part A receiving tarlatamab 10 mg Q2W with 48-h inpatient monitoring for cycle 1 doses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In cycle 1, the rates of treatment-related adverse events and hospitalizations, including emergency room visits, were similar between outpatient (<em>n</em> = 30) and inpatient (<em>n</em> = 58) groups (93% versus 100% and 27% versus 34%, respectively). The incidence of all grade and serious CRS during cycle 1 was similar between outpatient and inpatient groups (any grade: 60% versus 62%; serious: 17% versus 22%). The median time to CRS resolution was 3 days for both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Safety outcomes, including hospitalization rates, were similar in this first-in-human study following tarlatamab 10 mg Q2W administration with 6-8-h outpatient versus 48-h inpatient monitoring in cycle 1.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 104538"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of tarlatamab with 6-8-h outpatient versus 48-h inpatient monitoring during cycle 1: DeLLphi-300 phase 1 substudy\",\"authors\":\"A.C. Chiang , M.E. Olmedo Garcia , J.W. Carlisle , A. Dowlati , N. Reguart , E. Felip , P.J. Jost , N. Steeghs , R. Stec , S.M. Gadgeel , H.H. Loong , W. Jiang , A. Hamidi , A. Parkes , L. Paz-Ares\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3, has demonstrated promising survival outcomes in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Given the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), initial clinical trials incorporated 48-72-h inpatient monitoring in cycle 1.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with previously treated SCLC were enrolled into DeLLphi-300 part F, which evaluated the safety of tarlatamab 10 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) with 6-8-h outpatient monitoring following cycle 1 doses. The primary endpoint, safety, was compared with patients from DeLLphi-300 part A receiving tarlatamab 10 mg Q2W with 48-h inpatient monitoring for cycle 1 doses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In cycle 1, the rates of treatment-related adverse events and hospitalizations, including emergency room visits, were similar between outpatient (<em>n</em> = 30) and inpatient (<em>n</em> = 58) groups (93% versus 100% and 27% versus 34%, respectively). The incidence of all grade and serious CRS during cycle 1 was similar between outpatient and inpatient groups (any grade: 60% versus 62%; serious: 17% versus 22%). The median time to CRS resolution was 3 days for both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Safety outcomes, including hospitalization rates, were similar in this first-in-human study following tarlatamab 10 mg Q2W administration with 6-8-h outpatient versus 48-h inpatient monitoring in cycle 1.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Open\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 104538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702925004077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702925004077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety of tarlatamab with 6-8-h outpatient versus 48-h inpatient monitoring during cycle 1: DeLLphi-300 phase 1 substudy
Background
Tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3, has demonstrated promising survival outcomes in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Given the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), initial clinical trials incorporated 48-72-h inpatient monitoring in cycle 1.
Methods
Patients with previously treated SCLC were enrolled into DeLLphi-300 part F, which evaluated the safety of tarlatamab 10 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) with 6-8-h outpatient monitoring following cycle 1 doses. The primary endpoint, safety, was compared with patients from DeLLphi-300 part A receiving tarlatamab 10 mg Q2W with 48-h inpatient monitoring for cycle 1 doses.
Results
In cycle 1, the rates of treatment-related adverse events and hospitalizations, including emergency room visits, were similar between outpatient (n = 30) and inpatient (n = 58) groups (93% versus 100% and 27% versus 34%, respectively). The incidence of all grade and serious CRS during cycle 1 was similar between outpatient and inpatient groups (any grade: 60% versus 62%; serious: 17% versus 22%). The median time to CRS resolution was 3 days for both groups.
Conclusions
Safety outcomes, including hospitalization rates, were similar in this first-in-human study following tarlatamab 10 mg Q2W administration with 6-8-h outpatient versus 48-h inpatient monitoring in cycle 1.
期刊介绍:
ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research.
ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO.
Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.