利用外部呼吸测定法对传统的热量呼吸测定法进行验证,以量化土壤微生物代谢的热量呼吸比。

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Verónica Piñeiro , Yago Lestido-Cardama , César Pérez-Cruzado , Nieves Barros
{"title":"利用外部呼吸测定法对传统的热量呼吸测定法进行验证,以量化土壤微生物代谢的热量呼吸比。","authors":"Verónica Piñeiro ,&nbsp;Yago Lestido-Cardama ,&nbsp;César Pérez-Cruzado ,&nbsp;Nieves Barros","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The calorespirometric ratio is a metabolic indicator that can be useful in soil science for understanding thermodynamics and the carbon use efficiency of soil microbial metabolism. Calculating calorespirometric ratios for soil microbial metabolism involves the development of calorespirometric procedures using calorimeters of the heat conduction type. The calorespirometric measurements for soil microbial metabolism are recent and their calculation requires sensitive calorimeters and accurate measurements. Their interpretation for soils has been developing during the last years, but accuracy of the methods involved in their calculation are still under question. This paper analyses the precision of the traditional calorespirometric method to yield these calorespirometric ratios by comparison with analysis of respiration measured in parallel using chromatography. Results indicated that the CO<sub>2</sub> data obtained by chromatography and calorespirometry are significantly correlated with each other and with the heat rate of the soil microbial metabolism. The comparison of the CO<sub>2</sub> data from both methods by the paired sample Wilcoxon signed rank test yielded no statistically significant differences. Nevertheless, small changes in the CO<sub>2</sub> determinations, due to the method of measurement or to the reproducibility of these indices in the soil replicates, affected the experimental quantitative values of the calorespirometric ratios. Differences in the quantitative values were large enough in some of the samples to yield distinct interpretations of the results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 109812"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the traditional calorespirometric procedure using external respirometry to quantify the calorespirometric ratio of soil microbial metabolism\",\"authors\":\"Verónica Piñeiro ,&nbsp;Yago Lestido-Cardama ,&nbsp;César Pérez-Cruzado ,&nbsp;Nieves Barros\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The calorespirometric ratio is a metabolic indicator that can be useful in soil science for understanding thermodynamics and the carbon use efficiency of soil microbial metabolism. Calculating calorespirometric ratios for soil microbial metabolism involves the development of calorespirometric procedures using calorimeters of the heat conduction type. The calorespirometric measurements for soil microbial metabolism are recent and their calculation requires sensitive calorimeters and accurate measurements. Their interpretation for soils has been developing during the last years, but accuracy of the methods involved in their calculation are still under question. This paper analyses the precision of the traditional calorespirometric method to yield these calorespirometric ratios by comparison with analysis of respiration measured in parallel using chromatography. Results indicated that the CO<sub>2</sub> data obtained by chromatography and calorespirometry are significantly correlated with each other and with the heat rate of the soil microbial metabolism. The comparison of the CO<sub>2</sub> data from both methods by the paired sample Wilcoxon signed rank test yielded no statistically significant differences. Nevertheless, small changes in the CO<sub>2</sub> determinations, due to the method of measurement or to the reproducibility of these indices in the soil replicates, affected the experimental quantitative values of the calorespirometric ratios. Differences in the quantitative values were large enough in some of the samples to yield distinct interpretations of the results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725001051\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725001051","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热肺比是土壤科学中了解土壤微生物代谢热力学和碳利用效率的代谢指标。计算土壤微生物代谢的量热比涉及到使用热传导型量热计的量热计程序的发展。土壤微生物代谢的量热计测量是最近才出现的,其计算需要灵敏的量热计和精确的测量。在过去的几年里,他们对土壤的解释一直在发展,但是他们计算方法的准确性仍然受到质疑。本文通过与色谱法平行测定呼吸量的方法进行比较,分析了传统的热呼吸量测定方法所得到的热呼吸量测定比的精度。结果表明,色谱法和量热法测定的CO2值与土壤微生物代谢热速率呈显著相关。两种方法的CO2数据经配对样本Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较,差异无统计学意义。然而,由于测量方法或这些指标在土壤重复中的可重复性,CO2测定的微小变化影响了热肺比的实验定量值。在一些样本中,定量值的差异大到足以对结果产生不同的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the traditional calorespirometric procedure using external respirometry to quantify the calorespirometric ratio of soil microbial metabolism
The calorespirometric ratio is a metabolic indicator that can be useful in soil science for understanding thermodynamics and the carbon use efficiency of soil microbial metabolism. Calculating calorespirometric ratios for soil microbial metabolism involves the development of calorespirometric procedures using calorimeters of the heat conduction type. The calorespirometric measurements for soil microbial metabolism are recent and their calculation requires sensitive calorimeters and accurate measurements. Their interpretation for soils has been developing during the last years, but accuracy of the methods involved in their calculation are still under question. This paper analyses the precision of the traditional calorespirometric method to yield these calorespirometric ratios by comparison with analysis of respiration measured in parallel using chromatography. Results indicated that the CO2 data obtained by chromatography and calorespirometry are significantly correlated with each other and with the heat rate of the soil microbial metabolism. The comparison of the CO2 data from both methods by the paired sample Wilcoxon signed rank test yielded no statistically significant differences. Nevertheless, small changes in the CO2 determinations, due to the method of measurement or to the reproducibility of these indices in the soil replicates, affected the experimental quantitative values of the calorespirometric ratios. Differences in the quantitative values were large enough in some of the samples to yield distinct interpretations of the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信