死胎胎盘原因的深入分析和分类:地区死胎登记处的十年回顾性研究

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Leila Caillault, Rémi Béranger, Philippe Loget, Pauline Blanc-Petitjean, Maela Le Lous, Gwenaelle Le Bouar, Alain Lescoat, Ronan Garlantézec, Nicolas Belhomme, the Ille et Vilaine stillbirth study group
{"title":"死胎胎盘原因的深入分析和分类:地区死胎登记处的十年回顾性研究","authors":"Leila Caillault,&nbsp;Rémi Béranger,&nbsp;Philippe Loget,&nbsp;Pauline Blanc-Petitjean,&nbsp;Maela Le Lous,&nbsp;Gwenaelle Le Bouar,&nbsp;Alain Lescoat,&nbsp;Ronan Garlantézec,&nbsp;Nicolas Belhomme,&nbsp;the Ille et Vilaine stillbirth study group","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Abnormal placental lesions are commonly identified in stillbirth. Interpreting these lesions and their contribution to fetal demise presents significant challenges. Recommended CODAC classification does not include detailed placental examination results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study reports abnormal placental patterns in relation to the distribution of stillbirth causes in order to refine the categories of causes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the Ille-Et-Vilaine Stillbirth cohort, an exhaustive register of stillbirth cases across the Ille-et-Vilaine French department, were implemented in 2010.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>All seven maternity wards in the Ille-et-Vilaine department, France.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>All cases of stillbirth located in the Ille-et-Vilaine department between 2010 and 2019.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Descriptive statistics were used with the chi-squared test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>All placental examinations were reported following the Amsterdam consensus. Cause of death was ascertained according to the CODAC (Classification of Cause of Death and Associated Conditions) classification during multidisciplinary meetings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 566 stillbirths were documented. The most frequent stillbirth causes were placental cause (36%), followed by umbilical cord (11%) and infections (9%). Stillbirth remained unexplained in 17% of cases. Small placenta and maternal malperfusion emerged as the most frequent placental lesions within the placental stillbirth group (65%), but also within the maternal cause groups (65%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Placental vascular anomalies were the most frequent cause of stillbirth in this study. Based on the combined use of international classification and observation of histological anomalies, our data suggest the existence of a vascular stillbirth group defined by vascular lesions associated with maternal or fetal expression.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 8","pages":"1166-1177"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18158","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An In-Depth Analysis and Classification of Placental Causes of Stillbirth: A 10-Year Retrospective Study of a Regional Stillbirth Registry\",\"authors\":\"Leila Caillault,&nbsp;Rémi Béranger,&nbsp;Philippe Loget,&nbsp;Pauline Blanc-Petitjean,&nbsp;Maela Le Lous,&nbsp;Gwenaelle Le Bouar,&nbsp;Alain Lescoat,&nbsp;Ronan Garlantézec,&nbsp;Nicolas Belhomme,&nbsp;the Ille et Vilaine stillbirth study group\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.18158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Abnormal placental lesions are commonly identified in stillbirth. Interpreting these lesions and their contribution to fetal demise presents significant challenges. Recommended CODAC classification does not include detailed placental examination results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study reports abnormal placental patterns in relation to the distribution of stillbirth causes in order to refine the categories of causes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data from the Ille-Et-Vilaine Stillbirth cohort, an exhaustive register of stillbirth cases across the Ille-et-Vilaine French department, were implemented in 2010.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>All seven maternity wards in the Ille-et-Vilaine department, France.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Population</h3>\\n \\n <p>All cases of stillbirth located in the Ille-et-Vilaine department between 2010 and 2019.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Descriptive statistics were used with the chi-squared test.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>All placental examinations were reported following the Amsterdam consensus. Cause of death was ascertained according to the CODAC (Classification of Cause of Death and Associated Conditions) classification during multidisciplinary meetings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 566 stillbirths were documented. The most frequent stillbirth causes were placental cause (36%), followed by umbilical cord (11%) and infections (9%). Stillbirth remained unexplained in 17% of cases. Small placenta and maternal malperfusion emerged as the most frequent placental lesions within the placental stillbirth group (65%), but also within the maternal cause groups (65%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Placental vascular anomalies were the most frequent cause of stillbirth in this study. Based on the combined use of international classification and observation of histological anomalies, our data suggest the existence of a vascular stillbirth group defined by vascular lesions associated with maternal or fetal expression.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"132 8\",\"pages\":\"1166-1177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18158\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18158\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18158","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胎盘异常病变通常在死胎中被发现。解释这些病变及其对胎儿死亡的贡献提出了重大挑战。推荐的CODAC分类不包括详细的胎盘检查结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An In-Depth Analysis and Classification of Placental Causes of Stillbirth: A 10-Year Retrospective Study of a Regional Stillbirth Registry

Introduction

Abnormal placental lesions are commonly identified in stillbirth. Interpreting these lesions and their contribution to fetal demise presents significant challenges. Recommended CODAC classification does not include detailed placental examination results.

Objective

This study reports abnormal placental patterns in relation to the distribution of stillbirth causes in order to refine the categories of causes.

Design

Data from the Ille-Et-Vilaine Stillbirth cohort, an exhaustive register of stillbirth cases across the Ille-et-Vilaine French department, were implemented in 2010.

Setting

All seven maternity wards in the Ille-et-Vilaine department, France.

Population

All cases of stillbirth located in the Ille-et-Vilaine department between 2010 and 2019.

Methods

Descriptive statistics were used with the chi-squared test.

Main Outcome Measures

All placental examinations were reported following the Amsterdam consensus. Cause of death was ascertained according to the CODAC (Classification of Cause of Death and Associated Conditions) classification during multidisciplinary meetings.

Results

A total of 566 stillbirths were documented. The most frequent stillbirth causes were placental cause (36%), followed by umbilical cord (11%) and infections (9%). Stillbirth remained unexplained in 17% of cases. Small placenta and maternal malperfusion emerged as the most frequent placental lesions within the placental stillbirth group (65%), but also within the maternal cause groups (65%).

Conclusion

Placental vascular anomalies were the most frequent cause of stillbirth in this study. Based on the combined use of international classification and observation of histological anomalies, our data suggest the existence of a vascular stillbirth group defined by vascular lesions associated with maternal or fetal expression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信