第二代脉络膜上视网膜假体中基于深度的视觉处理算法的导航效果。

Lauren Moussallem, Lisa Lombardi, Myra Beth McGuinness, Maria Kolic, Elizabeth K Baglin, Rui Jin, Nariman Habili, Jessica Kvansakul, Samuel A Titchener, Carla J Abbott, Janine G Walker, Penelope J Allen, Matthew A Petoe, Nick Barnes
{"title":"第二代脉络膜上视网膜假体中基于深度的视觉处理算法的导航效果。","authors":"Lauren Moussallem, Lisa Lombardi, Myra Beth McGuinness, Maria Kolic, Elizabeth K Baglin, Rui Jin, Nariman Habili, Jessica Kvansakul, Samuel A Titchener, Carla J Abbott, Janine G Walker, Penelope J Allen, Matthew A Petoe, Nick Barnes","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/adc83a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective&#xD;To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel depth-based vision processing (VP) method, Local Background Enclosure (LBE), in comparison to the comprehensive VP method, Lanczos2 (L2), in suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis implant recipients during navigational tasks in laboratory and real-world settings. &#xD;Approach&#xD;Four participants were acclimatized to both VP methods. Participants were asked to detect and navigate past five of eight possible obstacles in a white corridor across 20-30 trials. Randomized obstacles included black or white mannequins, black or white overhanging boxes, black or white bins and black or white stationary boxes. The same four participants underwent trials at three different real-word urban locations using both VP methods (randomized order). They were tasked with navigating a complex, dynamic pre-determined scene while detecting, verbally identifying, and avoiding obstacles in their path. &#xD;Main results&#xD;The indoor obstacle course showed that the LBE method (63.6 ± 10.7%, mean ± SD) performed significantly better than L2 (48.5 ± 11.2%), for detection of obstacles (p<0.001, Mack-Skillings). The real-world assessment showed that of the objects detected, 50.2% (138/275) were correctly identified using LBE and 41.7% (138/331) using L2, corresponding to a risk difference of 8 percentage points, p=0.081). &#xD;Significance&#xD;Real world outcomes can be improved using an enhanced vision processing algorithm, providing depth-based visual cues (#NCT05158049). &#xD;&#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigational outcomes with a depth-based vision processing algorithm in a second-generation suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Moussallem, Lisa Lombardi, Myra Beth McGuinness, Maria Kolic, Elizabeth K Baglin, Rui Jin, Nariman Habili, Jessica Kvansakul, Samuel A Titchener, Carla J Abbott, Janine G Walker, Penelope J Allen, Matthew A Petoe, Nick Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1741-2552/adc83a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective&#xD;To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel depth-based vision processing (VP) method, Local Background Enclosure (LBE), in comparison to the comprehensive VP method, Lanczos2 (L2), in suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis implant recipients during navigational tasks in laboratory and real-world settings. &#xD;Approach&#xD;Four participants were acclimatized to both VP methods. Participants were asked to detect and navigate past five of eight possible obstacles in a white corridor across 20-30 trials. Randomized obstacles included black or white mannequins, black or white overhanging boxes, black or white bins and black or white stationary boxes. The same four participants underwent trials at three different real-word urban locations using both VP methods (randomized order). They were tasked with navigating a complex, dynamic pre-determined scene while detecting, verbally identifying, and avoiding obstacles in their path. &#xD;Main results&#xD;The indoor obstacle course showed that the LBE method (63.6 ± 10.7%, mean ± SD) performed significantly better than L2 (48.5 ± 11.2%), for detection of obstacles (p<0.001, Mack-Skillings). The real-world assessment showed that of the objects detected, 50.2% (138/275) were correctly identified using LBE and 41.7% (138/331) using L2, corresponding to a risk difference of 8 percentage points, p=0.081). &#xD;Significance&#xD;Real world outcomes can be improved using an enhanced vision processing algorithm, providing depth-based visual cues (#NCT05158049). &#xD;&#xD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adc83a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adc83a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价一种新的基于深度的视觉处理(VP)方法,局部背景框(LBE),与综合的基于深度的视觉处理方法,Lanczos2 (L2),在实验室和现实环境中导航任务中的脉络膜上视网膜假体植入者的有效性。方法 ;四名参与者适应了两种VP方法。在20-30次试验中,参与者被要求在白色走廊中发现并穿越8个可能的障碍物中的5个。随机障碍包括黑色或白色的人体模型、黑色或白色的悬空盒子、黑色或白色的箱子以及黑色或白色的固定盒子。同样的四名参与者在三个不同的真实城市地点使用两种VP方法(随机顺序)进行了试验。他们的任务是在一个复杂的、动态的预先确定的场景中导航,同时探测、口头识别和避开道路上的障碍物。主要结果在室内障碍训练中,LBE方法(63.6±10.7%,mean±SD)对障碍物的检测效果显著优于L2方法(48.5±11.2%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigational outcomes with a depth-based vision processing algorithm in a second-generation suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis.

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel depth-based vision processing (VP) method, Local Background Enclosure (LBE), in comparison to the comprehensive VP method, Lanczos2 (L2), in suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis implant recipients during navigational tasks in laboratory and real-world settings. Approach Four participants were acclimatized to both VP methods. Participants were asked to detect and navigate past five of eight possible obstacles in a white corridor across 20-30 trials. Randomized obstacles included black or white mannequins, black or white overhanging boxes, black or white bins and black or white stationary boxes. The same four participants underwent trials at three different real-word urban locations using both VP methods (randomized order). They were tasked with navigating a complex, dynamic pre-determined scene while detecting, verbally identifying, and avoiding obstacles in their path. Main results The indoor obstacle course showed that the LBE method (63.6 ± 10.7%, mean ± SD) performed significantly better than L2 (48.5 ± 11.2%), for detection of obstacles (p<0.001, Mack-Skillings). The real-world assessment showed that of the objects detected, 50.2% (138/275) were correctly identified using LBE and 41.7% (138/331) using L2, corresponding to a risk difference of 8 percentage points, p=0.081). Significance Real world outcomes can be improved using an enhanced vision processing algorithm, providing depth-based visual cues (#NCT05158049). .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信