中低收入国家以社区为主导的传染病预防和管理战略:对健康、社会和经济影响的混合方法系统回顾。

PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-04-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004304
Pitchaya P Indravudh, Kathleen McGee, Euphemia L Sibanda, Elizabeth L Corbett, Katherine Fielding, Fern Terris-Prestholt
{"title":"中低收入国家以社区为主导的传染病预防和管理战略:对健康、社会和经济影响的混合方法系统回顾。","authors":"Pitchaya P Indravudh, Kathleen McGee, Euphemia L Sibanda, Elizabeth L Corbett, Katherine Fielding, Fern Terris-Prestholt","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Control of infectious diseases is a global health priority and a target of the 2015-2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Community participation is fundamental to advancing primary health care and meeting SDGs. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic literature review of quantitative and qualitative evidence to understand the health, social, and economic impact of community-led strategies for communicable disease prevention and management in low- and middle- income countries. We searched seven electronic databases through 31 December, 2023 for cluster-randomised trials and economic evaluations of community-led communicable disease control. Reference searches identified additional studies associated with eligible database records. Data extraction and narrative synthesis summarised evidence on impact, costs, and cost-effectiveness, described the nature and extent of community participation, and examined implementation, mechanisms of impact, and contexts. Risk of bias of was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the Drummond checklist. Our database search yielded 14,269 records. Following database and reference screening, we included 49 records across 16 unique cluster-randomised trials, mostly from sub-Saharan Africa. Communicable disease strategies included provision of biomedical products, environmental modifications, and education and outreach. Based on evidence with moderate risk of bias, we found that community-led strategies can improve health behaviours for diarrhoeal diseases, HIV, malaria, and neglected tropical diseases. Evidence for impact on mortality and morbidity, health care access and utilisation, and community and social outcomes was less conclusive. Impact depended on the intensity of implementation by community actors. Factors facilitating implementation included motivation, trust, and health systems engagement. Contextual influences included attitudes and norms around communicable diseases. Economic studies were few and many omitted societal costs and consequences. This review supports community-led communicable disease control as a potentially effective strategy to improve health behaviours and contribute to SDGs. Operational guidance for implementation and evaluation is critical to support rapid evidence generation in this important area.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 4","pages":"e0004304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community-led strategies for communicable disease prevention and management in low- and middle- income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review of health, social, and economic impact.\",\"authors\":\"Pitchaya P Indravudh, Kathleen McGee, Euphemia L Sibanda, Elizabeth L Corbett, Katherine Fielding, Fern Terris-Prestholt\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Control of infectious diseases is a global health priority and a target of the 2015-2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Community participation is fundamental to advancing primary health care and meeting SDGs. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic literature review of quantitative and qualitative evidence to understand the health, social, and economic impact of community-led strategies for communicable disease prevention and management in low- and middle- income countries. We searched seven electronic databases through 31 December, 2023 for cluster-randomised trials and economic evaluations of community-led communicable disease control. Reference searches identified additional studies associated with eligible database records. Data extraction and narrative synthesis summarised evidence on impact, costs, and cost-effectiveness, described the nature and extent of community participation, and examined implementation, mechanisms of impact, and contexts. Risk of bias of was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the Drummond checklist. Our database search yielded 14,269 records. Following database and reference screening, we included 49 records across 16 unique cluster-randomised trials, mostly from sub-Saharan Africa. Communicable disease strategies included provision of biomedical products, environmental modifications, and education and outreach. Based on evidence with moderate risk of bias, we found that community-led strategies can improve health behaviours for diarrhoeal diseases, HIV, malaria, and neglected tropical diseases. Evidence for impact on mortality and morbidity, health care access and utilisation, and community and social outcomes was less conclusive. Impact depended on the intensity of implementation by community actors. Factors facilitating implementation included motivation, trust, and health systems engagement. Contextual influences included attitudes and norms around communicable diseases. Economic studies were few and many omitted societal costs and consequences. This review supports community-led communicable disease control as a potentially effective strategy to improve health behaviours and contribute to SDGs. Operational guidance for implementation and evaluation is critical to support rapid evidence generation in this important area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"e0004304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964228/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传染病控制是全球卫生优先事项,也是2015-2030年可持续发展目标的一项具体目标。社区参与对于推进初级卫生保健和实现可持续发展目标至关重要。我们对定量和定性证据进行了一项混合方法的系统文献综述,以了解社区主导的传染病预防和管理战略在低收入和中等收入国家的健康、社会和经济影响。我们检索了截至2023年12月31日的7个电子数据库,检索了社区主导的传染病控制的聚类随机试验和经济评估。参考检索确定了与合格数据库记录相关的其他研究。数据提取和叙事综合总结了有关影响、成本和成本效益的证据,描述了社区参与的性质和程度,并审查了实施情况、影响机制和背景。的偏倚风险采用Cochrane风险偏倚工具和Drummond检查表进行评估。我们的数据库搜索产生了14,269条记录。在数据库和参考文献筛选之后,我们纳入了16项独特的集群随机试验的49条记录,主要来自撒哈拉以南非洲。传染病战略包括提供生物医学产品、改变环境以及教育和外联。基于具有中等偏倚风险的证据,我们发现社区主导的战略可以改善腹泻病、艾滋病毒、疟疾和被忽视的热带病的健康行为。对死亡率和发病率、卫生保健的获取和利用以及社区和社会结果的影响的证据不那么确凿。影响取决于社区行动者执行的力度。促进实施的因素包括动机、信任和卫生系统参与。环境影响包括对传染病的态度和规范。经济研究很少,而且很多都忽略了社会成本和后果。本综述支持以社区为主导的传染病控制作为改善健康行为和促进可持续发展目标的潜在有效战略。实施和评估的业务指导对于支持这一重要领域的快速证据生成至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community-led strategies for communicable disease prevention and management in low- and middle- income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review of health, social, and economic impact.

Control of infectious diseases is a global health priority and a target of the 2015-2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Community participation is fundamental to advancing primary health care and meeting SDGs. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic literature review of quantitative and qualitative evidence to understand the health, social, and economic impact of community-led strategies for communicable disease prevention and management in low- and middle- income countries. We searched seven electronic databases through 31 December, 2023 for cluster-randomised trials and economic evaluations of community-led communicable disease control. Reference searches identified additional studies associated with eligible database records. Data extraction and narrative synthesis summarised evidence on impact, costs, and cost-effectiveness, described the nature and extent of community participation, and examined implementation, mechanisms of impact, and contexts. Risk of bias of was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the Drummond checklist. Our database search yielded 14,269 records. Following database and reference screening, we included 49 records across 16 unique cluster-randomised trials, mostly from sub-Saharan Africa. Communicable disease strategies included provision of biomedical products, environmental modifications, and education and outreach. Based on evidence with moderate risk of bias, we found that community-led strategies can improve health behaviours for diarrhoeal diseases, HIV, malaria, and neglected tropical diseases. Evidence for impact on mortality and morbidity, health care access and utilisation, and community and social outcomes was less conclusive. Impact depended on the intensity of implementation by community actors. Factors facilitating implementation included motivation, trust, and health systems engagement. Contextual influences included attitudes and norms around communicable diseases. Economic studies were few and many omitted societal costs and consequences. This review supports community-led communicable disease control as a potentially effective strategy to improve health behaviours and contribute to SDGs. Operational guidance for implementation and evaluation is critical to support rapid evidence generation in this important area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信