Stephanie Lacey, Maria Lisa Odland, Ali Sié, Guy Harling, Till Bärnighausen, Pascal Geldsetzer, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Justine I Davies
{"title":"布基纳法索农村成人高血压患者的可及性和护理质量:来自横断面家庭调查的结果","authors":"Stephanie Lacey, Maria Lisa Odland, Ali Sié, Guy Harling, Till Bärnighausen, Pascal Geldsetzer, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Justine I Davies","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0003161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Providing quality healthcare is essential to reduce the future burden of cardiovascular disease. We assessed the quality of care for people with hypertension in Burkina Faso using the Institute of Medicine (IoM) Quality Domains of effectiveness, timeliness of access, patient-centredness and equitability of care. We performed an analysis of cross-sectional household survey data collected from a population-representative sample of 4000 adults ≥40 years in Nouna, Burkina Faso in 2018. For people with hypertension, effectiveness was assessed through care cascades describing the proportion who were screened, diagnosed, treated, and achieved hypertension control; timeliness was defined as access to care within the last three months. Patient-centredness was described using experiential quality process and outcome measures (dichotomised as higher or lower quality [score above or below and including the median, respectively]; a shared understanding and decision-making (SUDM) variable was described. Equity was assessed for effectiveness, timeliness, and patient-centredness in multivariable analyses including socio-demographic factors. In total, 1006 participants with hypertension were included. Hypertension prevalence was 34.8%; 62.3% had been screened, 42.9% diagnosed, 15.0% treated, and 6.8% were controlled; 26.8% had accessed care within the last three months. Overall, 61.8% of participants had a positive view of the health service. Clarity of communication and opinion of medical provider knowledge were the best-rated experiential quality process variables, with 40.1% and 39.7% of participants´ responses indicating higher quality care respectively. The mean SUDM score was 68.5 (±10.8), range 25.0-100.0. Regarding equity, screening was higher in females, adults with any education, those who were married or cohabiting, and those in the higher wealth quintiles. There were no associations seen between SUDM and sociodemographic variables. Although the prevalence of hypertension was high in this population, the quality of care was not commensurate, with room for improvement in all four IoM Domains assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 4","pages":"e0003161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessibility and quality of care for adults with hypertension in rural Burkina Faso: results from a cross-sectional household survey.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Lacey, Maria Lisa Odland, Ali Sié, Guy Harling, Till Bärnighausen, Pascal Geldsetzer, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Justine I Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgph.0003161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Providing quality healthcare is essential to reduce the future burden of cardiovascular disease. We assessed the quality of care for people with hypertension in Burkina Faso using the Institute of Medicine (IoM) Quality Domains of effectiveness, timeliness of access, patient-centredness and equitability of care. We performed an analysis of cross-sectional household survey data collected from a population-representative sample of 4000 adults ≥40 years in Nouna, Burkina Faso in 2018. For people with hypertension, effectiveness was assessed through care cascades describing the proportion who were screened, diagnosed, treated, and achieved hypertension control; timeliness was defined as access to care within the last three months. Patient-centredness was described using experiential quality process and outcome measures (dichotomised as higher or lower quality [score above or below and including the median, respectively]; a shared understanding and decision-making (SUDM) variable was described. Equity was assessed for effectiveness, timeliness, and patient-centredness in multivariable analyses including socio-demographic factors. In total, 1006 participants with hypertension were included. Hypertension prevalence was 34.8%; 62.3% had been screened, 42.9% diagnosed, 15.0% treated, and 6.8% were controlled; 26.8% had accessed care within the last three months. Overall, 61.8% of participants had a positive view of the health service. Clarity of communication and opinion of medical provider knowledge were the best-rated experiential quality process variables, with 40.1% and 39.7% of participants´ responses indicating higher quality care respectively. The mean SUDM score was 68.5 (±10.8), range 25.0-100.0. Regarding equity, screening was higher in females, adults with any education, those who were married or cohabiting, and those in the higher wealth quintiles. There were no associations seen between SUDM and sociodemographic variables. Although the prevalence of hypertension was high in this population, the quality of care was not commensurate, with room for improvement in all four IoM Domains assessed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"e0003161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accessibility and quality of care for adults with hypertension in rural Burkina Faso: results from a cross-sectional household survey.
Providing quality healthcare is essential to reduce the future burden of cardiovascular disease. We assessed the quality of care for people with hypertension in Burkina Faso using the Institute of Medicine (IoM) Quality Domains of effectiveness, timeliness of access, patient-centredness and equitability of care. We performed an analysis of cross-sectional household survey data collected from a population-representative sample of 4000 adults ≥40 years in Nouna, Burkina Faso in 2018. For people with hypertension, effectiveness was assessed through care cascades describing the proportion who were screened, diagnosed, treated, and achieved hypertension control; timeliness was defined as access to care within the last three months. Patient-centredness was described using experiential quality process and outcome measures (dichotomised as higher or lower quality [score above or below and including the median, respectively]; a shared understanding and decision-making (SUDM) variable was described. Equity was assessed for effectiveness, timeliness, and patient-centredness in multivariable analyses including socio-demographic factors. In total, 1006 participants with hypertension were included. Hypertension prevalence was 34.8%; 62.3% had been screened, 42.9% diagnosed, 15.0% treated, and 6.8% were controlled; 26.8% had accessed care within the last three months. Overall, 61.8% of participants had a positive view of the health service. Clarity of communication and opinion of medical provider knowledge were the best-rated experiential quality process variables, with 40.1% and 39.7% of participants´ responses indicating higher quality care respectively. The mean SUDM score was 68.5 (±10.8), range 25.0-100.0. Regarding equity, screening was higher in females, adults with any education, those who were married or cohabiting, and those in the higher wealth quintiles. There were no associations seen between SUDM and sociodemographic variables. Although the prevalence of hypertension was high in this population, the quality of care was not commensurate, with room for improvement in all four IoM Domains assessed.