机器人辅助对全髋关节置换术的影响:细粒度洞察手术时间。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Karlos Zepeda, Carmelo Burgio, Theofilos Karasavvidis, Tsion Yared, Cale Pagan, Edward Grabov, Seth A Jerabek, David J Mayman, Jonathan M Vigdorchik
{"title":"机器人辅助对全髋关节置换术的影响:细粒度洞察手术时间。","authors":"Karlos Zepeda, Carmelo Burgio, Theofilos Karasavvidis, Tsion Yared, Cale Pagan, Edward Grabov, Seth A Jerabek, David J Mayman, Jonathan M Vigdorchik","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitals need efficiency and cost-effectiveness due to the shift to a value-based healthcare system. While robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) provides improved accuracy of component positioning, surgeons are concerned about increased surgical times. This study compared surgical time between RA-THA and manual THA (M-THA) through a granular analysis of individual procedural steps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted at a single institution from February to March 2024. A consecutive series of 50 primary posterior approach THA cases were included, excluding patients who had prior hardware or previous ipsilateral surgery. The study comprised 25 RA-THAs and 25 M-THAs. There were six clinical fellows, supervised by five attending orthopaedic surgeons, who performed the surgeries, representing a typical clinical training scenario. Of the attending surgeons, three conducted RA-THAs using a computed tomography (CT)-based robotic platform, while two performed manual procedures. Key intraoperative steps individually recorded included pin placement, registration, and robotic reaming in the RA-THA group and acetabular reaming in the M-THA group. Multivariate regression models evaluated the impact of robotic assistance on surgical times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total surgical times were similar for both groups (76 ± 10 versus 77 ± 13 minutes, P = 0.8). Robotic assistance did not significantly affect total surgical time (P = 0.5; 95% CI [confidence interval]: -8.7 to 19.7). The combined time for pin placement, registration, and reaming in RA-THA was comparable to acetabular reaming in M-THA (7 ± 1.1 versus 6.8 ± 1.8 minutes, P = 0.7). Acetabulum reaming in RA-THA was significantly shorter than in M-THA (2.3 ± 0.7 versus 6.8 ± 1.8 minutes, P < 0.001). Pin placement and registration times were 2.2 ±0.9 and 2.4 ± 0.7 minutes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of RA-THA does not increase surgical time compared to M-THA, indicating that the use of robotic systems can maintain OR efficiency. The additional time required for robotics seems to be offset by the reduced time needed for acetabular reaming. These findings support the broader adoption of robotic assistance in THA, offering potential benefits without compromising time.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Robotic Assistance on Total Hip Arthroplasty: Granular Insights into Surgical Time.\",\"authors\":\"Karlos Zepeda, Carmelo Burgio, Theofilos Karasavvidis, Tsion Yared, Cale Pagan, Edward Grabov, Seth A Jerabek, David J Mayman, Jonathan M Vigdorchik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitals need efficiency and cost-effectiveness due to the shift to a value-based healthcare system. While robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) provides improved accuracy of component positioning, surgeons are concerned about increased surgical times. This study compared surgical time between RA-THA and manual THA (M-THA) through a granular analysis of individual procedural steps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted at a single institution from February to March 2024. A consecutive series of 50 primary posterior approach THA cases were included, excluding patients who had prior hardware or previous ipsilateral surgery. The study comprised 25 RA-THAs and 25 M-THAs. There were six clinical fellows, supervised by five attending orthopaedic surgeons, who performed the surgeries, representing a typical clinical training scenario. Of the attending surgeons, three conducted RA-THAs using a computed tomography (CT)-based robotic platform, while two performed manual procedures. Key intraoperative steps individually recorded included pin placement, registration, and robotic reaming in the RA-THA group and acetabular reaming in the M-THA group. Multivariate regression models evaluated the impact of robotic assistance on surgical times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total surgical times were similar for both groups (76 ± 10 versus 77 ± 13 minutes, P = 0.8). Robotic assistance did not significantly affect total surgical time (P = 0.5; 95% CI [confidence interval]: -8.7 to 19.7). The combined time for pin placement, registration, and reaming in RA-THA was comparable to acetabular reaming in M-THA (7 ± 1.1 versus 6.8 ± 1.8 minutes, P = 0.7). Acetabulum reaming in RA-THA was significantly shorter than in M-THA (2.3 ± 0.7 versus 6.8 ± 1.8 minutes, P < 0.001). Pin placement and registration times were 2.2 ±0.9 and 2.4 ± 0.7 minutes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of RA-THA does not increase surgical time compared to M-THA, indicating that the use of robotic systems can maintain OR efficiency. The additional time required for robotics seems to be offset by the reduced time needed for acetabular reaming. These findings support the broader adoption of robotic assistance in THA, offering potential benefits without compromising time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.068\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医院需要提高效率和成本效益,这是因为医疗系统正向以价值为基础的方向转变。虽然机器人辅助全髋关节置换术(RA-THA)提高了部件定位的准确性,但外科医生担心手术时间会增加。本研究通过对单个手术步骤进行精细分析,比较了RA-THA和人工全髋关节置换术(M-THA)的手术时间:这项前瞻性研究于 2024 年 2 月至 3 月在一家医疗机构进行。研究纳入了 50 例连续的原发性后方入路 THA 病例,排除了既往有硬件或既往同侧手术的患者。研究包括 25 例 RA-THA 和 25 例 M-THA。共有六名临床研究员在五名骨科主治外科医生的指导下进行了手术,代表了典型的临床培训情况。在主治外科医生中,有三位使用基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的机器人平台进行了RA-THA手术,另两位则进行了手动手术。单独记录的术中关键步骤包括RA-THA组的置针、登记和机器人扩孔,以及M-THA组的髋臼扩孔。多变量回归模型评估了机器人辅助对手术时间的影响:结果:两组手术总时间相似(76±10 分钟对 77±13 分钟,P = 0.8)。机器人辅助对手术总时间没有明显影响(P = 0.5;95% CI [置信区间]:-8.7 至 19.7)。RA-THA的置针、登记和扩孔时间与M-THA的髋臼扩孔时间相当(7±1.1分钟对6.8±1.8分钟,P = 0.7)。RA-THA的髋臼扩孔时间明显短于M-THA(2.3±0.7分钟对6.8±1.8分钟,P <0.001)。置钉和登记时间分别为2.2±0.9分钟和2.4±0.7分钟:讨论:与M-THA相比,使用RA-THA不会增加手术时间,这表明使用机器人系统可以保持手术室的效率。机器人所需的额外时间似乎被髋臼铰孔所需时间的减少所抵消。这些研究结果支持在THA中更广泛地采用机器人辅助,在不影响时间的情况下提供潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Robotic Assistance on Total Hip Arthroplasty: Granular Insights into Surgical Time.

Background: Hospitals need efficiency and cost-effectiveness due to the shift to a value-based healthcare system. While robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) provides improved accuracy of component positioning, surgeons are concerned about increased surgical times. This study compared surgical time between RA-THA and manual THA (M-THA) through a granular analysis of individual procedural steps.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted at a single institution from February to March 2024. A consecutive series of 50 primary posterior approach THA cases were included, excluding patients who had prior hardware or previous ipsilateral surgery. The study comprised 25 RA-THAs and 25 M-THAs. There were six clinical fellows, supervised by five attending orthopaedic surgeons, who performed the surgeries, representing a typical clinical training scenario. Of the attending surgeons, three conducted RA-THAs using a computed tomography (CT)-based robotic platform, while two performed manual procedures. Key intraoperative steps individually recorded included pin placement, registration, and robotic reaming in the RA-THA group and acetabular reaming in the M-THA group. Multivariate regression models evaluated the impact of robotic assistance on surgical times.

Results: Total surgical times were similar for both groups (76 ± 10 versus 77 ± 13 minutes, P = 0.8). Robotic assistance did not significantly affect total surgical time (P = 0.5; 95% CI [confidence interval]: -8.7 to 19.7). The combined time for pin placement, registration, and reaming in RA-THA was comparable to acetabular reaming in M-THA (7 ± 1.1 versus 6.8 ± 1.8 minutes, P = 0.7). Acetabulum reaming in RA-THA was significantly shorter than in M-THA (2.3 ± 0.7 versus 6.8 ± 1.8 minutes, P < 0.001). Pin placement and registration times were 2.2 ±0.9 and 2.4 ± 0.7 minutes, respectively.

Discussion: The use of RA-THA does not increase surgical time compared to M-THA, indicating that the use of robotic systems can maintain OR efficiency. The additional time required for robotics seems to be offset by the reduced time needed for acetabular reaming. These findings support the broader adoption of robotic assistance in THA, offering potential benefits without compromising time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信