澳大利亚成人肥胖管理:我们如何弥合指南和目前一般做法之间的差距?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bo Bi, Tiana Gurney, Srinivas Kondalsamy Chennakesavan
{"title":"澳大利亚成人肥胖管理:我们如何弥合指南和目前一般做法之间的差距?","authors":"Bo Bi, Tiana Gurney, Srinivas Kondalsamy Chennakesavan","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-07-23-6903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Obesity is still recognised as a risk factor rather than a chronic disease in Australia. General practitioners (GPs) have reported a lack of confidence and support in the management of obesity. In this study, we explored GPs' current definitions and treatment of obesity and their attitudes towards proposed clinician educational and billing strategies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was distributed to GPs across Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 189 GPs who completed the survey, 82% defined obesity, with and/or without comorbidities, as a chronic disease. There is a significant gap between current practice and clinical guidelines, particularly in screening and prevention. The overall attitude towards proposed solutions was very positive. Descriptive analysis was used to present the characteristics of the participants. Chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the relationship between categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Australia's outdated definition of obesity likely hinders management and contributes to the observed gap between clinical guidelines and current practice. Clinician education on behaviour change and long-term weight management, funding for more enhanced primary care referrals and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing of pharmacotherapy for weight loss might be possible solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"54 4","pages":"171-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adult obesity management in Australia: How can we bridge the gap between guidelines and current general practice?\",\"authors\":\"Bo Bi, Tiana Gurney, Srinivas Kondalsamy Chennakesavan\",\"doi\":\"10.31128/AJGP-07-23-6903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Obesity is still recognised as a risk factor rather than a chronic disease in Australia. General practitioners (GPs) have reported a lack of confidence and support in the management of obesity. In this study, we explored GPs' current definitions and treatment of obesity and their attitudes towards proposed clinician educational and billing strategies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was distributed to GPs across Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 189 GPs who completed the survey, 82% defined obesity, with and/or without comorbidities, as a chronic disease. There is a significant gap between current practice and clinical guidelines, particularly in screening and prevention. The overall attitude towards proposed solutions was very positive. Descriptive analysis was used to present the characteristics of the participants. Chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the relationship between categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Australia's outdated definition of obesity likely hinders management and contributes to the observed gap between clinical guidelines and current practice. Clinician education on behaviour change and long-term weight management, funding for more enhanced primary care referrals and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing of pharmacotherapy for weight loss might be possible solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"171-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-07-23-6903\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-07-23-6903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在澳大利亚,肥胖仍然被认为是一种危险因素,而不是一种慢性疾病。全科医生(全科医生)报告说,在肥胖管理方面缺乏信心和支持。在这项研究中,我们探讨了全科医生目前对肥胖的定义和治疗,以及他们对拟议的临床医生教育和计费策略的态度。方法:在这项横断面研究中,对澳大利亚的全科医生进行了在线调查。结果:在完成调查的189名全科医生中,82%的人将肥胖(有或无合并症)定义为一种慢性疾病。目前的实践和临床指南之间存在显著差距,特别是在筛查和预防方面。对提议的解决办法的总体态度是非常积极的。使用描述性分析来呈现参与者的特征。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验来评估分类变量之间的关系。讨论:澳大利亚对肥胖的过时定义可能会阻碍管理,并导致临床指南与当前实践之间的差距。对临床医生进行行为改变和长期体重管理方面的教育,为更多的初级保健转诊提供资金,以及在药物福利计划中列出药物治疗减肥可能是可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adult obesity management in Australia: How can we bridge the gap between guidelines and current general practice?

Background and objectives: Obesity is still recognised as a risk factor rather than a chronic disease in Australia. General practitioners (GPs) have reported a lack of confidence and support in the management of obesity. In this study, we explored GPs' current definitions and treatment of obesity and their attitudes towards proposed clinician educational and billing strategies.

Method: In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was distributed to GPs across Australia.

Results: Of the 189 GPs who completed the survey, 82% defined obesity, with and/or without comorbidities, as a chronic disease. There is a significant gap between current practice and clinical guidelines, particularly in screening and prevention. The overall attitude towards proposed solutions was very positive. Descriptive analysis was used to present the characteristics of the participants. Chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the relationship between categorical variables.

Discussion: Australia's outdated definition of obesity likely hinders management and contributes to the observed gap between clinical guidelines and current practice. Clinician education on behaviour change and long-term weight management, funding for more enhanced primary care referrals and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing of pharmacotherapy for weight loss might be possible solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信