在大流行期间因COVID-19住院的成年患者的细菌和病毒合并感染:EuCARE项目的一项多国队列研究

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Pontus Hedberg, Karol Serwin, Maria Francesca Greco, Joana P V Pereira, Dovile Juozapaite, Sara De Benedittis, Francesca Bai, Nadine Lübke, Tobias Wienemann, Iuri Fanti, Florian König, Nico Pfeifer, Rolf Kaiser, Maurizio Zazzi, Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri, Daniel Naumovas, Giulia Marchetti, Milosz Parczewski, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, Francesca Incardona, Anders Sönnerborg, Pontus Nauclér
{"title":"在大流行期间因COVID-19住院的成年患者的细菌和病毒合并感染:EuCARE项目的一项多国队列研究","authors":"Pontus Hedberg, Karol Serwin, Maria Francesca Greco, Joana P V Pereira, Dovile Juozapaite, Sara De Benedittis, Francesca Bai, Nadine Lübke, Tobias Wienemann, Iuri Fanti, Florian König, Nico Pfeifer, Rolf Kaiser, Maurizio Zazzi, Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri, Daniel Naumovas, Giulia Marchetti, Milosz Parczewski, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, Francesca Incardona, Anders Sönnerborg, Pontus Nauclér","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited evidence exists on how the occurrence of bacterial and viral co-infections have developed since the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant emerged. We investigated whether the occurrence of community-onset co-infections in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 differed during the Wild type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods, and whether such co-infections were associated with an increased risk of mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multinational cohort study including COVID-19 hospitalizations until 30 April 2023 in five European countries. The outcome was bacterial and viral co-infections, based on five different test modalities. Variant periods were compared with regards to occurrences of co-infections and risk ratios for co-infections (Omicron versus pre-Omicron), as well as association with in-hospital mortality (Omicron versus pre-Omicron).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,564 patients were included: 12,601 Wild type, 5,256 Alpha, 2,433 Delta, and 9,274 Omicron. The co-infection rate was 2.6% (327/12,601) for Wild type, 2.0% (105/5,256) for Alpha, 3.2% (77/2,433) for Delta, and 7.9% (737/9,274) for Omicron. Patients with Omicron had a significantly increased risk ratio of co-infection compared with preceding variants (1.88 [95% CI 1.53-2.32], P<0.001). These results were consistent across several subgroup analyses. An increased occurrence (19% [232/1,246] versus 11% [3,042/28,318]) and adjusted risk (1.69 [1.49-1.91], P<0.001) of in-hospital mortality was observed in patients with a verified co-infection compared with patients without a co-infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bacterial and viral co-infections were more prevalent during the Omicron period compared with preceding variants. Such co-infections were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, calling for sustained monitoring and clinical vigilance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial and viral co-infections in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 throughout the pandemic: A Multinational Cohort Study in the EuCARE Project.\",\"authors\":\"Pontus Hedberg, Karol Serwin, Maria Francesca Greco, Joana P V Pereira, Dovile Juozapaite, Sara De Benedittis, Francesca Bai, Nadine Lübke, Tobias Wienemann, Iuri Fanti, Florian König, Nico Pfeifer, Rolf Kaiser, Maurizio Zazzi, Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri, Daniel Naumovas, Giulia Marchetti, Milosz Parczewski, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, Francesca Incardona, Anders Sönnerborg, Pontus Nauclér\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiaf167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited evidence exists on how the occurrence of bacterial and viral co-infections have developed since the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant emerged. We investigated whether the occurrence of community-onset co-infections in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 differed during the Wild type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods, and whether such co-infections were associated with an increased risk of mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multinational cohort study including COVID-19 hospitalizations until 30 April 2023 in five European countries. The outcome was bacterial and viral co-infections, based on five different test modalities. Variant periods were compared with regards to occurrences of co-infections and risk ratios for co-infections (Omicron versus pre-Omicron), as well as association with in-hospital mortality (Omicron versus pre-Omicron).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,564 patients were included: 12,601 Wild type, 5,256 Alpha, 2,433 Delta, and 9,274 Omicron. The co-infection rate was 2.6% (327/12,601) for Wild type, 2.0% (105/5,256) for Alpha, 3.2% (77/2,433) for Delta, and 7.9% (737/9,274) for Omicron. Patients with Omicron had a significantly increased risk ratio of co-infection compared with preceding variants (1.88 [95% CI 1.53-2.32], P<0.001). These results were consistent across several subgroup analyses. An increased occurrence (19% [232/1,246] versus 11% [3,042/28,318]) and adjusted risk (1.69 [1.49-1.91], P<0.001) of in-hospital mortality was observed in patients with a verified co-infection compared with patients without a co-infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bacterial and viral co-infections were more prevalent during the Omicron period compared with preceding variants. Such co-infections were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, calling for sustained monitoring and clinical vigilance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自SARS-CoV-2组粒变异出现以来,关于细菌和病毒合并感染的发生是如何发展的证据有限。我们调查了在Wild型、Alpha型、Delta型和Omicron期住院的成年COVID-19患者中社区发病合并感染的发生率是否不同,以及这种合并感染是否与死亡风险增加有关。方法:我们在五个欧洲国家进行了一项多国队列研究,包括截至2023年4月30日的COVID-19住院情况。根据五种不同的测试方式,结果是细菌和病毒合并感染。比较不同时期的合并感染发生率和合并感染的风险比(Omicron与前Omicron),以及与院内死亡率的关系(Omicron与前Omicron)。结果:共纳入29,564例患者:12,601例Wild型,5,256例Alpha型,2,433例Delta型和9,274例Omicron型。合并感染率分别为:Wild型2.6%(327/ 12601)、Alpha型2.0%(105/ 5256)、Delta型3.2%(77/ 2433)、Omicron型7.9%(737/ 9274)。与先前的变异相比,使用Omicron的患者合并感染的风险比显著增加(1.88 [95% CI 1.53-2.32])。结论:与先前的变异相比,细菌和病毒合并感染在Omicron期间更为普遍。这种合并感染与院内死亡风险增加有关,需要持续监测和临床警惕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bacterial and viral co-infections in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 throughout the pandemic: A Multinational Cohort Study in the EuCARE Project.

Background: Limited evidence exists on how the occurrence of bacterial and viral co-infections have developed since the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant emerged. We investigated whether the occurrence of community-onset co-infections in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 differed during the Wild type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods, and whether such co-infections were associated with an increased risk of mortality.

Methods: We conducted a multinational cohort study including COVID-19 hospitalizations until 30 April 2023 in five European countries. The outcome was bacterial and viral co-infections, based on five different test modalities. Variant periods were compared with regards to occurrences of co-infections and risk ratios for co-infections (Omicron versus pre-Omicron), as well as association with in-hospital mortality (Omicron versus pre-Omicron).

Results: A total of 29,564 patients were included: 12,601 Wild type, 5,256 Alpha, 2,433 Delta, and 9,274 Omicron. The co-infection rate was 2.6% (327/12,601) for Wild type, 2.0% (105/5,256) for Alpha, 3.2% (77/2,433) for Delta, and 7.9% (737/9,274) for Omicron. Patients with Omicron had a significantly increased risk ratio of co-infection compared with preceding variants (1.88 [95% CI 1.53-2.32], P<0.001). These results were consistent across several subgroup analyses. An increased occurrence (19% [232/1,246] versus 11% [3,042/28,318]) and adjusted risk (1.69 [1.49-1.91], P<0.001) of in-hospital mortality was observed in patients with a verified co-infection compared with patients without a co-infection.

Conclusions: Bacterial and viral co-infections were more prevalent during the Omicron period compared with preceding variants. Such co-infections were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, calling for sustained monitoring and clinical vigilance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Journal of Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
449
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published continuously since 1904, The Journal of Infectious Diseases (JID) is the premier global journal for original research on infectious diseases. The editors welcome Major Articles and Brief Reports describing research results on microbiology, immunology, epidemiology, and related disciplines, on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases; on the microbes that cause them; and on disorders of host immune responses. JID is an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信