人类休息和运动时血压控制的复杂性:颈动脉化学反射的作用。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Jason H. Mateika
{"title":"人类休息和运动时血压控制的复杂性:颈动脉化学反射的作用。","authors":"Jason H. Mateika","doi":"10.1113/JP288705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hypertension is a preventable medical condition that impacts ∼30% of the global adult population (Zhou et al., <span>2021</span>). Under conditions of resting wakefulness, the blood pressure of around half the patients receiving treatment for hypertension remains uncontrolled (Zhou et al., <span>2021</span>). Moreover, patients whose blood pressure is controlled under resting conditions often experience uncontrolled surges in blood pressure during exercise (Jones et al., <span>2022</span>) that have been linked to increased risk of end-organ damage. In the present edition of <i>The Journal of Physiology</i>, Hinton et al. (<span>2025</span>) explore the role that the carotid chemoreflex has in blood pressure control during rest and exercise (i.e. submaximal exercise at 40–50% of maximal oxygen consumption) in a group of young (age = 28 ± 5 years) patients (<i>n</i> = 8 males and <i>n</i> = 6 females) with early-onset hypertension that was untreated. The hypertensive group was matched to a control group based on sex, age and height. Body mass index was higher in the hypertensive group; however, the body mass index of both groups was indicative of normal weight. To determine whether carotid chemoreflex sensitivity was higher in hypertensive individuals during rest and exercise, participants were exposed to a maximum of six episodes of hypoxia induced by the inspiration of 100% nitrogen interspersed with 3 min normoxic recovery periods. The duration of each hypoxic episode was varied to induce a range of mild to severe hypoxic levels across episodes. The ventilatory response to hypoxia was considered to be a non-invasive measure of carotid chemoreflex sensitivity.</p><p>The ventilatory response to hypoxia was measured after the infusion of saline and dopamine (i.e. an agent known to inhibit carotid chemoreflex discharge) that was administered randomly. The results showed that the carotid chemoreflex sensitivity was similar in the hypertensive and normotensive groups during rest and that the anticipated increase in sensitivity during exercise was similar in both groups. These findings were contrary to the hypothesis that chemoreflex sensitivity would be higher in the hypertensive group during both rest and exercise (Hinton et al., <span>2025</span>). The results also showed that the administration of dopamine resulted in a reduction in the ventilatory response to hypoxia compared to measures after saline administration. However, a similar reduction was evident in the hypertensive and normotensive groups. In association with these findings, Hinton et al. (<span>2025</span>) also report that the blood pressure response to hypoxia during rest was reduced following dopamine infusion compared to saline. However, the reduction was similar in the hypertensive and normotensive groups. Moreover, reductions in blood pressure measures during rest and exercise under normoxic conditions were similar in the hypertensive and normotensive groups following dopamine infusion. One exception was noted: a reduction in systolic but not diastolic blood pressure was higher in the hypertensive group during rest following dopamine infusion.</p><p>Overall, contrary to the hypotheses of Hinton et al. (<span>2025</span>), increases in carotid chemoreflex sensitivity did not appear to have a prominent role in the hypertension that was evident in young untreated participants. On the one hand, the finding is robust because the strategy to recruit untreated hypertensive young patients ensured that potential confounding factors related to anti-hypertensive therapy were eliminated. Similarly, the strategy to match the hypertensive and normotensive groups based on sex, age and weight eliminated a number of confounding anthropometric factors that could be responsible for any differences between groups that were evident in the measured outcomes associated with the experimental design. On the other hand, as a consequence of the recruitment strategy, an exclusive group of hypertensive individuals were targeted and, consequently, the results of the study might not be applicable to other subpopulations of individuals living with hypertension. Likewise, the stringency of the matching strategy may have been partly responsible for the small <i>n</i> values that comprised both groups, which could have a role in reducing the power of some of the statistically non-significant findings that were reported.</p><p>As is typically the case with all well designed studies, many additional questions remain to be answered based on the results of the study. These additional questions include whether or not increased carotid chemoreflex sensitivity is an endotypic mechanism that has a predominant role in the development of hypertension in some patients and not others (i.e. young untreated hypertensive patients). Indeed, individuals with sleep apnoea that is induced predominantly by high loop gain (n.b. increased chemoreflex sensitivity contributes to high loop gain) (Puri et al., <span>2021</span>) might be a population in which increased carotid chemoreflex sensitivity has a predominate role in the development of co-morbid hypertension. In addition, given the number of potential mechanisms (i.e. baroreflex, carotid chemoreflex and metaboreflex, to name but a few) that contribute to high blood pressure during rest and/or exercise, the manner in which these mechanisms interact and, ultimately, how this interaction might influence the pharmacological treatment of high blood pressure in different subpopulations of patients with hypertension is of interest. Lastly, previous work by Panza et al. (<span>2022</span>) has shown that the method used to measure the ventilatory response to hypoxia (i.e. intermittent episodes of hypoxia) is accompanied by a gradual increase in blood pressure that is sustained for at least 30 min following exposure. It would be of interest to determine whether the progressive increase in blood pressure is greater in hypertensive individuals and whether the administration of dopamine immediately after exposure results in a higher reduction in blood pressure in hypertensive individuals under these experimental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"603 8","pages":"2179-2180"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/JP288705","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The complex nature of blood pressure control during rest and exercise in humans: The role of the carotid chemoreflex\",\"authors\":\"Jason H. Mateika\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/JP288705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Hypertension is a preventable medical condition that impacts ∼30% of the global adult population (Zhou et al., <span>2021</span>). Under conditions of resting wakefulness, the blood pressure of around half the patients receiving treatment for hypertension remains uncontrolled (Zhou et al., <span>2021</span>). Moreover, patients whose blood pressure is controlled under resting conditions often experience uncontrolled surges in blood pressure during exercise (Jones et al., <span>2022</span>) that have been linked to increased risk of end-organ damage. In the present edition of <i>The Journal of Physiology</i>, Hinton et al. (<span>2025</span>) explore the role that the carotid chemoreflex has in blood pressure control during rest and exercise (i.e. submaximal exercise at 40–50% of maximal oxygen consumption) in a group of young (age = 28 ± 5 years) patients (<i>n</i> = 8 males and <i>n</i> = 6 females) with early-onset hypertension that was untreated. The hypertensive group was matched to a control group based on sex, age and height. Body mass index was higher in the hypertensive group; however, the body mass index of both groups was indicative of normal weight. To determine whether carotid chemoreflex sensitivity was higher in hypertensive individuals during rest and exercise, participants were exposed to a maximum of six episodes of hypoxia induced by the inspiration of 100% nitrogen interspersed with 3 min normoxic recovery periods. The duration of each hypoxic episode was varied to induce a range of mild to severe hypoxic levels across episodes. The ventilatory response to hypoxia was considered to be a non-invasive measure of carotid chemoreflex sensitivity.</p><p>The ventilatory response to hypoxia was measured after the infusion of saline and dopamine (i.e. an agent known to inhibit carotid chemoreflex discharge) that was administered randomly. The results showed that the carotid chemoreflex sensitivity was similar in the hypertensive and normotensive groups during rest and that the anticipated increase in sensitivity during exercise was similar in both groups. These findings were contrary to the hypothesis that chemoreflex sensitivity would be higher in the hypertensive group during both rest and exercise (Hinton et al., <span>2025</span>). The results also showed that the administration of dopamine resulted in a reduction in the ventilatory response to hypoxia compared to measures after saline administration. However, a similar reduction was evident in the hypertensive and normotensive groups. In association with these findings, Hinton et al. (<span>2025</span>) also report that the blood pressure response to hypoxia during rest was reduced following dopamine infusion compared to saline. However, the reduction was similar in the hypertensive and normotensive groups. Moreover, reductions in blood pressure measures during rest and exercise under normoxic conditions were similar in the hypertensive and normotensive groups following dopamine infusion. One exception was noted: a reduction in systolic but not diastolic blood pressure was higher in the hypertensive group during rest following dopamine infusion.</p><p>Overall, contrary to the hypotheses of Hinton et al. (<span>2025</span>), increases in carotid chemoreflex sensitivity did not appear to have a prominent role in the hypertension that was evident in young untreated participants. On the one hand, the finding is robust because the strategy to recruit untreated hypertensive young patients ensured that potential confounding factors related to anti-hypertensive therapy were eliminated. Similarly, the strategy to match the hypertensive and normotensive groups based on sex, age and weight eliminated a number of confounding anthropometric factors that could be responsible for any differences between groups that were evident in the measured outcomes associated with the experimental design. On the other hand, as a consequence of the recruitment strategy, an exclusive group of hypertensive individuals were targeted and, consequently, the results of the study might not be applicable to other subpopulations of individuals living with hypertension. Likewise, the stringency of the matching strategy may have been partly responsible for the small <i>n</i> values that comprised both groups, which could have a role in reducing the power of some of the statistically non-significant findings that were reported.</p><p>As is typically the case with all well designed studies, many additional questions remain to be answered based on the results of the study. These additional questions include whether or not increased carotid chemoreflex sensitivity is an endotypic mechanism that has a predominant role in the development of hypertension in some patients and not others (i.e. young untreated hypertensive patients). Indeed, individuals with sleep apnoea that is induced predominantly by high loop gain (n.b. increased chemoreflex sensitivity contributes to high loop gain) (Puri et al., <span>2021</span>) might be a population in which increased carotid chemoreflex sensitivity has a predominate role in the development of co-morbid hypertension. In addition, given the number of potential mechanisms (i.e. baroreflex, carotid chemoreflex and metaboreflex, to name but a few) that contribute to high blood pressure during rest and/or exercise, the manner in which these mechanisms interact and, ultimately, how this interaction might influence the pharmacological treatment of high blood pressure in different subpopulations of patients with hypertension is of interest. Lastly, previous work by Panza et al. (<span>2022</span>) has shown that the method used to measure the ventilatory response to hypoxia (i.e. intermittent episodes of hypoxia) is accompanied by a gradual increase in blood pressure that is sustained for at least 30 min following exposure. It would be of interest to determine whether the progressive increase in blood pressure is greater in hypertensive individuals and whether the administration of dopamine immediately after exposure results in a higher reduction in blood pressure in hypertensive individuals under these experimental conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"volume\":\"603 8\",\"pages\":\"2179-2180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/JP288705\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP288705\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP288705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高血压是一种可预防的疾病,影响着全球约30%的成年人(Zhou et al., 2021)。在静息清醒状态下,约有一半接受高血压治疗的患者血压仍不受控制(Zhou et al., 2021)。此外,在静息状态下血压得到控制的患者在运动时经常会出现不受控制的血压飙升(Jones et al., 2022),这与终末器官损伤的风险增加有关。在本期的the Journal of Physiology上,Hinton等人(2025)在一组年轻(年龄= 28±5岁)的早发性高血压患者(n = 8男,n = 6女)中探讨了颈动脉化学反射在休息和运动期间(即最大耗氧量40-50%的次最大运动)血压控制中的作用。高血压组根据性别、年龄和身高与对照组相匹配。高血压组体重指数较高;然而,两组的体重指数均为正常体重。为了确定高血压患者在休息和运动时颈动脉化学反射敏感性是否更高,研究人员让受试者接受最多6次由100%氮气吸入引起的缺氧,并穿插3分钟的正常缺氧恢复期。每次缺氧发作的持续时间不同,以在发作期间诱导轻度至重度缺氧水平的范围。对缺氧的通气反应被认为是颈动脉化学反射敏感性的无创测量。在随机输注生理盐水和多巴胺(即一种已知能抑制颈动脉化学反射放电的药物)后,测量对缺氧的通气反应。结果显示,高血压组和正常组在休息时的颈动脉化学反射敏感性相似,运动时预期的敏感性增加在两组中相似。这些发现与高血压组在休息和运动时化学反射敏感性更高的假设相反(Hinton et al., 2025)。结果还表明,与生理盐水给药相比,多巴胺的给药导致缺氧通气反应的减少。然而,高血压和正常血压组也有类似的降低。与这些发现相关联,Hinton等人(2025)也报道,与生理盐水相比,多巴胺输注后休息时血压对缺氧的反应降低。然而,在高血压和正常血压组中,这种降低是相似的。此外,在正常条件下,高血压组和正常组在多巴胺输注后,在休息和运动期间血压测量值的降低是相似的。注意到一个例外:高血压组在多巴胺输注后休息时收缩压下降而不是舒张压下降更高。总的来说,与Hinton等人(2025)的假设相反,颈动脉化学反射敏感性的增加似乎在未接受治疗的年轻参与者中没有明显的高血压作用。一方面,这一发现是稳健的,因为招募未经治疗的年轻高血压患者的策略确保了与抗高血压治疗相关的潜在混杂因素被消除。同样,根据性别、年龄和体重匹配高血压组和正常组的策略消除了许多混淆的人体测量因素,这些因素可能导致与实验设计相关的测量结果明显的组间差异。另一方面,由于招募策略的结果,仅针对一组高血压个体,因此,研究结果可能不适用于其他高血压患者亚群。同样,匹配策略的严格性可能是组成两组的小n值的部分原因,这可能会降低一些报告的统计上不显著的发现的力量。正如所有设计良好的研究的典型情况一样,基于研究结果,许多其他问题仍有待回答。这些额外的问题包括,颈动脉化学反射敏感性的增加是否是一种内源性机制,在某些患者(即未经治疗的年轻高血压患者)的高血压发展中起主导作用。事实上,睡眠呼吸暂停主要是由高环路增益引起的(注:增加的化学反射敏感性有助于高环路增益)(Puri等人)。 , 2021)可能是一个颈动脉化学反射敏感性增加在并发高血压的发展中起主导作用的人群。此外,考虑到在休息和/或运动期间导致高血压的潜在机制(例如,压力反射、颈动脉化学反射和代谢反射,仅举几例),这些机制相互作用的方式以及最终这种相互作用如何影响高血压患者不同亚群中高血压的药物治疗是令人感兴趣的。最后,Panza等人(2022)之前的研究表明,用于测量缺氧通气反应(即间歇性缺氧发作)的方法伴随着血压的逐渐升高,并在暴露后持续至少30分钟。在这些实验条件下,确定高血压个体血压的进行性升高是否更大,以及接触多巴胺后立即给予多巴胺是否会导致高血压个体血压的更高降低,将是一项有趣的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The complex nature of blood pressure control during rest and exercise in humans: The role of the carotid chemoreflex

Hypertension is a preventable medical condition that impacts ∼30% of the global adult population (Zhou et al., 2021). Under conditions of resting wakefulness, the blood pressure of around half the patients receiving treatment for hypertension remains uncontrolled (Zhou et al., 2021). Moreover, patients whose blood pressure is controlled under resting conditions often experience uncontrolled surges in blood pressure during exercise (Jones et al., 2022) that have been linked to increased risk of end-organ damage. In the present edition of The Journal of Physiology, Hinton et al. (2025) explore the role that the carotid chemoreflex has in blood pressure control during rest and exercise (i.e. submaximal exercise at 40–50% of maximal oxygen consumption) in a group of young (age = 28 ± 5 years) patients (n = 8 males and n = 6 females) with early-onset hypertension that was untreated. The hypertensive group was matched to a control group based on sex, age and height. Body mass index was higher in the hypertensive group; however, the body mass index of both groups was indicative of normal weight. To determine whether carotid chemoreflex sensitivity was higher in hypertensive individuals during rest and exercise, participants were exposed to a maximum of six episodes of hypoxia induced by the inspiration of 100% nitrogen interspersed with 3 min normoxic recovery periods. The duration of each hypoxic episode was varied to induce a range of mild to severe hypoxic levels across episodes. The ventilatory response to hypoxia was considered to be a non-invasive measure of carotid chemoreflex sensitivity.

The ventilatory response to hypoxia was measured after the infusion of saline and dopamine (i.e. an agent known to inhibit carotid chemoreflex discharge) that was administered randomly. The results showed that the carotid chemoreflex sensitivity was similar in the hypertensive and normotensive groups during rest and that the anticipated increase in sensitivity during exercise was similar in both groups. These findings were contrary to the hypothesis that chemoreflex sensitivity would be higher in the hypertensive group during both rest and exercise (Hinton et al., 2025). The results also showed that the administration of dopamine resulted in a reduction in the ventilatory response to hypoxia compared to measures after saline administration. However, a similar reduction was evident in the hypertensive and normotensive groups. In association with these findings, Hinton et al. (2025) also report that the blood pressure response to hypoxia during rest was reduced following dopamine infusion compared to saline. However, the reduction was similar in the hypertensive and normotensive groups. Moreover, reductions in blood pressure measures during rest and exercise under normoxic conditions were similar in the hypertensive and normotensive groups following dopamine infusion. One exception was noted: a reduction in systolic but not diastolic blood pressure was higher in the hypertensive group during rest following dopamine infusion.

Overall, contrary to the hypotheses of Hinton et al. (2025), increases in carotid chemoreflex sensitivity did not appear to have a prominent role in the hypertension that was evident in young untreated participants. On the one hand, the finding is robust because the strategy to recruit untreated hypertensive young patients ensured that potential confounding factors related to anti-hypertensive therapy were eliminated. Similarly, the strategy to match the hypertensive and normotensive groups based on sex, age and weight eliminated a number of confounding anthropometric factors that could be responsible for any differences between groups that were evident in the measured outcomes associated with the experimental design. On the other hand, as a consequence of the recruitment strategy, an exclusive group of hypertensive individuals were targeted and, consequently, the results of the study might not be applicable to other subpopulations of individuals living with hypertension. Likewise, the stringency of the matching strategy may have been partly responsible for the small n values that comprised both groups, which could have a role in reducing the power of some of the statistically non-significant findings that were reported.

As is typically the case with all well designed studies, many additional questions remain to be answered based on the results of the study. These additional questions include whether or not increased carotid chemoreflex sensitivity is an endotypic mechanism that has a predominant role in the development of hypertension in some patients and not others (i.e. young untreated hypertensive patients). Indeed, individuals with sleep apnoea that is induced predominantly by high loop gain (n.b. increased chemoreflex sensitivity contributes to high loop gain) (Puri et al., 2021) might be a population in which increased carotid chemoreflex sensitivity has a predominate role in the development of co-morbid hypertension. In addition, given the number of potential mechanisms (i.e. baroreflex, carotid chemoreflex and metaboreflex, to name but a few) that contribute to high blood pressure during rest and/or exercise, the manner in which these mechanisms interact and, ultimately, how this interaction might influence the pharmacological treatment of high blood pressure in different subpopulations of patients with hypertension is of interest. Lastly, previous work by Panza et al. (2022) has shown that the method used to measure the ventilatory response to hypoxia (i.e. intermittent episodes of hypoxia) is accompanied by a gradual increase in blood pressure that is sustained for at least 30 min following exposure. It would be of interest to determine whether the progressive increase in blood pressure is greater in hypertensive individuals and whether the administration of dopamine immediately after exposure results in a higher reduction in blood pressure in hypertensive individuals under these experimental conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信