5G远程机器人辅助胃切除术临床可行性的初步研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mingze Zhang, Ming Hu, Jing Yang, Wutang Jing, Jin Guo, Hui Cai, Yuntao Ma
{"title":"5G远程机器人辅助胃切除术临床可行性的初步研究。","authors":"Mingze Zhang, Ming Hu, Jing Yang, Wutang Jing, Jin Guo, Hui Cai, Yuntao Ma","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03780-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exploring the Clinical Safety and Feasibility of 5G Remote Surgery Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of two patients who underwent 5G remote surgery robot-assisted gastrectomy at the General Surgery Clinical Center of Gansu Provincial Hospital from June to September 2024. One case involved a cross-provincial remote surgery between Gansu Provincial Hospital and Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, located over 1700 km apart, classified as the \"long-distance patient.\" The other case involved a remote surgery within the province, between Gansu Provincial Hospital and the Gansu Provincial Hospital (Lanzhou New District Branch), located 70 km apart, classified as the \"short-distance patient.\" General data, intraoperative conditions, network status, postoperative routine information, and postoperative follow-up data were recorded and analyzed for two patients.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Both patients successfully completed the surgery. The master-slave control duration for the long-distance surgery patient and the short-distance surgery patient were 259 min and 308 min, respectively; the total surgical durations were 285 min and 320 min, respectively. Neither patient experienced an intraoperative conversion to traditional surgery. The average total delay for the long-distance surgery patient was 99 ms, and for the short-distance surgery patient, it was 48 ms; the packet loss rates were 0.0188% and 0%, respectively, with no network jitter or interruptions observed. The long-distance surgery patient had a drainage tube retention time of 10 d, a postoperative hospital stay of 14 d. The short-distance surgery patient had a drainage tube retention time of 8 d, a postoperative hospital stay of 10 d. No postoperative complications occurred in either patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that 5G remote surgery is feasible and safe, but larger-scale research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pilot study on the clinical feasibility of 5G remote robot-assisted gastrectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Mingze Zhang, Ming Hu, Jing Yang, Wutang Jing, Jin Guo, Hui Cai, Yuntao Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12957-025-03780-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exploring the Clinical Safety and Feasibility of 5G Remote Surgery Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of two patients who underwent 5G remote surgery robot-assisted gastrectomy at the General Surgery Clinical Center of Gansu Provincial Hospital from June to September 2024. One case involved a cross-provincial remote surgery between Gansu Provincial Hospital and Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, located over 1700 km apart, classified as the \\\"long-distance patient.\\\" The other case involved a remote surgery within the province, between Gansu Provincial Hospital and the Gansu Provincial Hospital (Lanzhou New District Branch), located 70 km apart, classified as the \\\"short-distance patient.\\\" General data, intraoperative conditions, network status, postoperative routine information, and postoperative follow-up data were recorded and analyzed for two patients.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Both patients successfully completed the surgery. The master-slave control duration for the long-distance surgery patient and the short-distance surgery patient were 259 min and 308 min, respectively; the total surgical durations were 285 min and 320 min, respectively. Neither patient experienced an intraoperative conversion to traditional surgery. The average total delay for the long-distance surgery patient was 99 ms, and for the short-distance surgery patient, it was 48 ms; the packet loss rates were 0.0188% and 0%, respectively, with no network jitter or interruptions observed. The long-distance surgery patient had a drainage tube retention time of 10 d, a postoperative hospital stay of 14 d. The short-distance surgery patient had a drainage tube retention time of 8 d, a postoperative hospital stay of 10 d. No postoperative complications occurred in either patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that 5G remote surgery is feasible and safe, but larger-scale research is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03780-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03780-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨5G远程手术机器人辅助胃切除术的临床安全性和可行性。方法:回顾性分析2024年6 - 9月甘肃省立医院普外科临床中心2例5G远程手术机器人辅助胃切除术患者的临床资料。其中一例涉及甘肃省立医院和扬州大学附属医院之间的跨省远程手术,两地相距1700多公里,被归类为“异地患者”。另一个病例涉及省内的一次远程手术,在甘肃省立医院和甘肃省立医院(兰州新区分院)之间,相距70公里,被归类为“近距离患者”。记录并分析2例患者的一般资料、术中情况、网络状况、术后常规信息及术后随访资料。结果:两例患者均顺利完成手术。远程手术患者主从控制时间为259 min,近距离手术患者主从控制时间为308 min;手术总时间分别为285 min和320 min。两名患者均未经历术中向传统手术的转变。远距离手术患者的平均总延迟为99 ms,短距离手术患者的平均总延迟为48 ms;丢包率分别为0.0188%和0%,没有观察到网络抖动或中断。远程手术患者引流管留置时间为10 d,术后住院时间为14 d。短程手术患者引流管留置时间为8 d,术后住院时间为10 d。两例患者均未发生术后并发症。结论:本研究提示5G远程手术是可行且安全的,但需要更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pilot study on the clinical feasibility of 5G remote robot-assisted gastrectomy.

Purpose: Exploring the Clinical Safety and Feasibility of 5G Remote Surgery Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of two patients who underwent 5G remote surgery robot-assisted gastrectomy at the General Surgery Clinical Center of Gansu Provincial Hospital from June to September 2024. One case involved a cross-provincial remote surgery between Gansu Provincial Hospital and Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, located over 1700 km apart, classified as the "long-distance patient." The other case involved a remote surgery within the province, between Gansu Provincial Hospital and the Gansu Provincial Hospital (Lanzhou New District Branch), located 70 km apart, classified as the "short-distance patient." General data, intraoperative conditions, network status, postoperative routine information, and postoperative follow-up data were recorded and analyzed for two patients.

Result: Both patients successfully completed the surgery. The master-slave control duration for the long-distance surgery patient and the short-distance surgery patient were 259 min and 308 min, respectively; the total surgical durations were 285 min and 320 min, respectively. Neither patient experienced an intraoperative conversion to traditional surgery. The average total delay for the long-distance surgery patient was 99 ms, and for the short-distance surgery patient, it was 48 ms; the packet loss rates were 0.0188% and 0%, respectively, with no network jitter or interruptions observed. The long-distance surgery patient had a drainage tube retention time of 10 d, a postoperative hospital stay of 14 d. The short-distance surgery patient had a drainage tube retention time of 8 d, a postoperative hospital stay of 10 d. No postoperative complications occurred in either patient.

Conclusion: This study suggests that 5G remote surgery is feasible and safe, but larger-scale research is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信