Evaluation of pituitary tumor volume as a prognostic factor in acromegaly: A cross-sectional study in two centers.

Background: Acromegaly is caused by a pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) with excessive production of growth hormone (GH), leading to multisystem complications. Previous studies have identified predictors of disease persistence following surgery and poor response to medical treatment, including tumor size, vertical and horizontal extensions of the adenoma, hyperintensity in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, granulation density, and pre- and postoperative GH and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels.

Aim: To evaluate PitNET volume as a complementary prognostic factor in patients with acromegaly.

Methods: This is a retrospective descriptive study with an analytical component evaluating the correlation between the volumetric analysis of GH-producing PitNETs, IGF-1 levels before and after surgery, disease control during follow-up, and the line of therapy required for disease control in a cohort of patients treated at two centers: Endocrinology Department of the Central Military Hospital and Centros Médicos Colsanitas, Bogotá, Colombia.

Results: A total of 77 patients with acromegaly (42 men, 35 women) were included in this study. The mean age at diagnosis was 42 years (SD: 12), with a mean disease duration of 9.9 years (SD: 7.2). The mean pituitary tumor volume was 4358 mm³ (SD: 6291, interquartile range [IQR]: 13602). Patients with controlled acromegaly had a mean PitNET volume of 3202 mm³ (SD: 4845, 95%CI: 621-5784) compared to 5513 mm³ (SD: 7447, 95%CI: 1545-9482) in the uncontrolled group (P = 0.15). A PitNET volume exceeding 3697 mm³ was associated with a higher likelihood of requiring third or fourth-line therapy (50% vs 36%; P = 0.03).

Conclusion: PitNET volume was associated with the need for higher-line therapy to manage acromegaly but did not correlate with long-term disease control or with pre- or postsurgical IGF-1 levels. Nevertheless, a trend towards an inverse relationship between tumor volume and future disease control was observed. While macroadenoma classification remains crucial, among patients with macroadenomas, those with a volume exceeding 3697 mm³ could have worse prognosis.