重振抗菌素耐药性复原力:利用CRISPR-Cas技术潜力抗击2024年世卫组织细菌性重点病原体,以加强全球卫生安全——一项系统综述

IF 3.6 Q1 TROPICAL MEDICINE
Olalekan John Okesanya, Mohamed Mustaf Ahmed, Jerico Bautista Ogaya, Blessing Olawunmi Amisu, Bonaventure Michael Ukoaka, Olaniyi Abideen Adigun, Emery Manirambona, Olakulehin Adebusuyi, Zhinya Kawa Othman, Olanegan Gloria Oluwakemi, Oluwaseunayo Deborah Ayando, Maria Ivy Rochelle S Tan, Nimat Bola Idris, Hassan Hakeem Kayode, Tolutope Adebimpe Oso, Musa Ahmed, M B N Kouwenhoven, Adamu Muhammad Ibrahim, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno
{"title":"重振抗菌素耐药性复原力:利用CRISPR-Cas技术潜力抗击2024年世卫组织细菌性重点病原体,以加强全球卫生安全——一项系统综述","authors":"Olalekan John Okesanya, Mohamed Mustaf Ahmed, Jerico Bautista Ogaya, Blessing Olawunmi Amisu, Bonaventure Michael Ukoaka, Olaniyi Abideen Adigun, Emery Manirambona, Olakulehin Adebusuyi, Zhinya Kawa Othman, Olanegan Gloria Oluwakemi, Oluwaseunayo Deborah Ayando, Maria Ivy Rochelle S Tan, Nimat Bola Idris, Hassan Hakeem Kayode, Tolutope Adebimpe Oso, Musa Ahmed, M B N Kouwenhoven, Adamu Muhammad Ibrahim, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno","doi":"10.1186/s41182-025-00728-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global health threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas system technology offers a promising tool to combat AMR by targeting and disabling resistance genes in WHO bacterial priority pathogens. Thus, we systematically reviewed the potential of CRISPR-Cas technology to address AMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Scopus and PubMed databases, focusing on publications from 2014 to June 2024. Keywords included \"CRISPR/Cas,\" \"antimicrobial resistance,\" and \"pathogen.\" The eligibility criteria required original studies involving CRISPR/Cas systems that targeted AMR. Data were extracted from eligible studies, qualitatively synthesized, and assessed for bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)-standardized tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 48 eligible studies revealed diverse CRISPR-Cas systems, including CRISPR-Cas9, CRISPR-Cas12a, and CRISPR-Cas3, targeting various AMR genes, such as blaOXA-232, blaNDM, blaCTX-M, ermB, vanA, mecA, fosA3, blaKPC, and mcr-1, which are responsible for carbapenem, cephalosporin, methicillin, macrolide, vancomycin, colistin, and fosfomycin resistance. Some studies have explored the role of CRISPR in virulence gene suppression, including enterotoxin genes, tsst1, and iutA in Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Delivery mechanisms include bacteriophages, nanoparticles, electro-transformation, and conjugative plasmids, which demonstrate high efficiency in vitro and in vivo. CRISPR-based diagnostic applications have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, with detection limits as low as 2.7 × 10<sup>2</sup> CFU/mL, significantly outperforming conventional methods. Experimental studies have reported significant reductions in resistant bacterial populations and complete suppression of the targeted strains. Engineered phagemid particles and plasmid-curing systems have been shown to eliminate IncF plasmids, cured plasmids carrying vanA, mcr-1, and blaNDM with 94% efficiency, and restore antibiotic susceptibility. Gene re-sensitization strategies have been used to restore fosfomycin susceptibility in E. coli and eliminate blaKPC-2-mediated carbapenem resistance in MDR bacteria. Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics tools have provided deeper insights into CRISPR-mediated defense mechanisms. Optimization strategies have significantly enhanced gene-editing efficiencies, offering a promising approach for tackling AMR in high-priority WHO pathogens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRISPR-Cas technology has the potential to address AMR across priority WHO pathogens. While promising, challenges in optimizing in vivo delivery, mitigating potential resistance, and navigating ethical-regulatory barriers must be addressed to facilitate clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23311,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Health","volume":"53 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinvigorating AMR resilience: leveraging CRISPR-Cas technology potentials to combat the 2024 WHO bacterial priority pathogens for enhanced global health security-a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Olalekan John Okesanya, Mohamed Mustaf Ahmed, Jerico Bautista Ogaya, Blessing Olawunmi Amisu, Bonaventure Michael Ukoaka, Olaniyi Abideen Adigun, Emery Manirambona, Olakulehin Adebusuyi, Zhinya Kawa Othman, Olanegan Gloria Oluwakemi, Oluwaseunayo Deborah Ayando, Maria Ivy Rochelle S Tan, Nimat Bola Idris, Hassan Hakeem Kayode, Tolutope Adebimpe Oso, Musa Ahmed, M B N Kouwenhoven, Adamu Muhammad Ibrahim, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41182-025-00728-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global health threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas system technology offers a promising tool to combat AMR by targeting and disabling resistance genes in WHO bacterial priority pathogens. Thus, we systematically reviewed the potential of CRISPR-Cas technology to address AMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Scopus and PubMed databases, focusing on publications from 2014 to June 2024. Keywords included \\\"CRISPR/Cas,\\\" \\\"antimicrobial resistance,\\\" and \\\"pathogen.\\\" The eligibility criteria required original studies involving CRISPR/Cas systems that targeted AMR. Data were extracted from eligible studies, qualitatively synthesized, and assessed for bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)-standardized tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 48 eligible studies revealed diverse CRISPR-Cas systems, including CRISPR-Cas9, CRISPR-Cas12a, and CRISPR-Cas3, targeting various AMR genes, such as blaOXA-232, blaNDM, blaCTX-M, ermB, vanA, mecA, fosA3, blaKPC, and mcr-1, which are responsible for carbapenem, cephalosporin, methicillin, macrolide, vancomycin, colistin, and fosfomycin resistance. Some studies have explored the role of CRISPR in virulence gene suppression, including enterotoxin genes, tsst1, and iutA in Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Delivery mechanisms include bacteriophages, nanoparticles, electro-transformation, and conjugative plasmids, which demonstrate high efficiency in vitro and in vivo. CRISPR-based diagnostic applications have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, with detection limits as low as 2.7 × 10<sup>2</sup> CFU/mL, significantly outperforming conventional methods. Experimental studies have reported significant reductions in resistant bacterial populations and complete suppression of the targeted strains. Engineered phagemid particles and plasmid-curing systems have been shown to eliminate IncF plasmids, cured plasmids carrying vanA, mcr-1, and blaNDM with 94% efficiency, and restore antibiotic susceptibility. Gene re-sensitization strategies have been used to restore fosfomycin susceptibility in E. coli and eliminate blaKPC-2-mediated carbapenem resistance in MDR bacteria. Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics tools have provided deeper insights into CRISPR-mediated defense mechanisms. Optimization strategies have significantly enhanced gene-editing efficiencies, offering a promising approach for tackling AMR in high-priority WHO pathogens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRISPR-Cas technology has the potential to address AMR across priority WHO pathogens. While promising, challenges in optimizing in vivo delivery, mitigating potential resistance, and navigating ethical-regulatory barriers must be addressed to facilitate clinical translation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Medicine and Health\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963374/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Medicine and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-025-00728-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TROPICAL MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-025-00728-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TROPICAL MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)构成全球健康威胁,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。聚集规律间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR)-Cas系统技术通过靶向和禁用世卫组织细菌重点病原体中的耐药基因,为抗击抗生素耐药性提供了一种很有前景的工具。因此,我们系统地回顾了CRISPR-Cas技术解决AMR的潜力。方法:本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。使用Scopus和PubMed数据库进行全面的文献检索,重点检索2014年至2024年6月的出版物。关键词包括“CRISPR/Cas”、“抗菌素耐药性”和“病原体”。资格标准要求涉及靶向AMR的CRISPR/Cas系统的原始研究。从符合条件的研究中提取数据,进行定性合成,并使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)标准化工具评估偏倚。结果:来自48项符合条件的研究的数据显示,多种CRISPR-Cas系统,包括CRISPR-Cas9、CRISPR-Cas12a和CRISPR-Cas3,靶向各种AMR基因,如blaOXA-232、blaNDM、blaCTX-M、ermB、vanA、mecA、fosA3、blaKPC和mcr-1,这些基因负责碳青霉烯类、头孢菌素、甲氧西林、大环内酯、万古霉素、粘菌素和磷霉素耐药。一些研究探索了CRISPR在抑制毒力基因中的作用,包括在金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌中的肠毒素基因、tsst1和iutA。传递机制包括噬菌体、纳米颗粒、电转化和共轭质粒,它们在体外和体内都表现出高效率。基于crispr的诊断应用具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,检出限低至2.7 × 102 CFU/mL,显著优于传统方法。实验研究报告了耐药细菌种群的显著减少和目标菌株的完全抑制。工程噬菌体颗粒和质粒固化系统已被证明能够以94%的效率消除IncF质粒、携带vanA、mcr-1和blaNDM的固化质粒,并恢复抗生素敏感性。基因再致敏策略已被用于恢复大肠杆菌对磷霉素的敏感性,并消除耐多药细菌中blakpc -2介导的碳青霉烯耐药性。全基因组测序和生物信息学工具为crispr介导的防御机制提供了更深入的见解。优化策略显著提高了基因编辑效率,为解决世卫组织高优先级病原体的抗菌素耐药性提供了一种有希望的方法。结论:CRISPR-Cas技术具有解决世卫组织重点病原体抗菌素耐药性问题的潜力。虽然前景看好,但必须解决优化体内给药、减轻潜在耐药性和克服伦理监管障碍方面的挑战,以促进临床转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reinvigorating AMR resilience: leveraging CRISPR-Cas technology potentials to combat the 2024 WHO bacterial priority pathogens for enhanced global health security-a systematic review.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global health threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas system technology offers a promising tool to combat AMR by targeting and disabling resistance genes in WHO bacterial priority pathogens. Thus, we systematically reviewed the potential of CRISPR-Cas technology to address AMR.

Methods: This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Scopus and PubMed databases, focusing on publications from 2014 to June 2024. Keywords included "CRISPR/Cas," "antimicrobial resistance," and "pathogen." The eligibility criteria required original studies involving CRISPR/Cas systems that targeted AMR. Data were extracted from eligible studies, qualitatively synthesized, and assessed for bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)-standardized tool.

Results: Data from 48 eligible studies revealed diverse CRISPR-Cas systems, including CRISPR-Cas9, CRISPR-Cas12a, and CRISPR-Cas3, targeting various AMR genes, such as blaOXA-232, blaNDM, blaCTX-M, ermB, vanA, mecA, fosA3, blaKPC, and mcr-1, which are responsible for carbapenem, cephalosporin, methicillin, macrolide, vancomycin, colistin, and fosfomycin resistance. Some studies have explored the role of CRISPR in virulence gene suppression, including enterotoxin genes, tsst1, and iutA in Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Delivery mechanisms include bacteriophages, nanoparticles, electro-transformation, and conjugative plasmids, which demonstrate high efficiency in vitro and in vivo. CRISPR-based diagnostic applications have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, with detection limits as low as 2.7 × 102 CFU/mL, significantly outperforming conventional methods. Experimental studies have reported significant reductions in resistant bacterial populations and complete suppression of the targeted strains. Engineered phagemid particles and plasmid-curing systems have been shown to eliminate IncF plasmids, cured plasmids carrying vanA, mcr-1, and blaNDM with 94% efficiency, and restore antibiotic susceptibility. Gene re-sensitization strategies have been used to restore fosfomycin susceptibility in E. coli and eliminate blaKPC-2-mediated carbapenem resistance in MDR bacteria. Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics tools have provided deeper insights into CRISPR-mediated defense mechanisms. Optimization strategies have significantly enhanced gene-editing efficiencies, offering a promising approach for tackling AMR in high-priority WHO pathogens.

Conclusions: CRISPR-Cas technology has the potential to address AMR across priority WHO pathogens. While promising, challenges in optimizing in vivo delivery, mitigating potential resistance, and navigating ethical-regulatory barriers must be addressed to facilitate clinical translation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine and Health
Tropical Medicine and Health TROPICAL MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信