大别班达病毒基因分型标准的建立及新基因型的确认。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Bingyan Liu, Tengfei He, Changtai Wang, Guomei Xia, Shijun Zhou, Shanshan Sun, Xinlei Chen, Xiaodan Hong, Jie Zhu, Zhenhua Zhang
{"title":"大别班达病毒基因分型标准的建立及新基因型的确认。","authors":"Bingyan Liu, Tengfei He, Changtai Wang, Guomei Xia, Shijun Zhou, Shanshan Sun, Xinlei Chen, Xiaodan Hong, Jie Zhu, Zhenhua Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-94203-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bandavirus dabieense (DBV) causes severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, which has a mortality rate of 6.18% of 27%. DBV has been classified into five to six genotypes using phylogenetic analyses. However, the absence of clear standards poses challenges in identifying new genotypes. We performed evolutionary and homology analyses using the sequences from GenBank and analysed nucleotide differences between the different genotypes. Nucleotide differences within the same genotype were mostly below 3%, whereas those between different genotypes ranged from 3 to 7%. Consequently, we established and validated a specific genotyping criterion for DBV using phylogenetic tree analysis with a 3% cut-off value and identified 8, 11, and 11 genotypes in the S, M, and L segments, respectively. Furthermore, we compared our method with the previous genotyping methods to elucidate the convenience and advantages of using a 3% cut-off value. Importantly, we also identified new genotypes and fragment reassortments in DBV using our new genotyping criterion. Additionally, we established two simplified genotyping methods for the rapid typing of DBV in clinical settings and demonstrated the existence of geographical and clinical variations among the different genotypes. Our findings provide a more reliable foundation for clinical typing of DBV.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"11269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment of a genotyping criteria for Bandavirus dabieense and confirmation of new genotypes.\",\"authors\":\"Bingyan Liu, Tengfei He, Changtai Wang, Guomei Xia, Shijun Zhou, Shanshan Sun, Xinlei Chen, Xiaodan Hong, Jie Zhu, Zhenhua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-94203-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bandavirus dabieense (DBV) causes severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, which has a mortality rate of 6.18% of 27%. DBV has been classified into five to six genotypes using phylogenetic analyses. However, the absence of clear standards poses challenges in identifying new genotypes. We performed evolutionary and homology analyses using the sequences from GenBank and analysed nucleotide differences between the different genotypes. Nucleotide differences within the same genotype were mostly below 3%, whereas those between different genotypes ranged from 3 to 7%. Consequently, we established and validated a specific genotyping criterion for DBV using phylogenetic tree analysis with a 3% cut-off value and identified 8, 11, and 11 genotypes in the S, M, and L segments, respectively. Furthermore, we compared our method with the previous genotyping methods to elucidate the convenience and advantages of using a 3% cut-off value. Importantly, we also identified new genotypes and fragment reassortments in DBV using our new genotyping criterion. Additionally, we established two simplified genotyping methods for the rapid typing of DBV in clinical settings and demonstrated the existence of geographical and clinical variations among the different genotypes. Our findings provide a more reliable foundation for clinical typing of DBV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"11269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94203-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94203-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

达比安带病毒(DBV)会导致严重的发热伴血小板减少综合征,死亡率为6.18%比27%。通过系统发育分析,DBV 已被分为五至六种基因型。然而,由于缺乏明确的标准,在确定新基因型时遇到了挑战。我们利用 GenBank 中的序列进行了进化和同源性分析,并分析了不同基因型之间的核苷酸差异。同一基因型内的核苷酸差异大多低于 3%,而不同基因型之间的核苷酸差异则在 3% 到 7% 之间。因此,我们利用系统发生树分析建立并验证了 DBV 的特定基因分型标准,截止值为 3%,并在 S、M 和 L 段分别鉴定出 8、11 和 11 个基因型。此外,我们还将我们的方法与之前的基因分型方法进行了比较,以阐明使用 3% 截止值的便利性和优势。重要的是,我们还利用新的基因分型标准在 DBV 中发现了新的基因型和片段重排。此外,我们还建立了两种简化的基因分型方法,用于在临床环境中对 DBV 进行快速分型,并证明了不同基因型之间存在地理和临床差异。我们的研究结果为 DBV 的临床分型提供了更可靠的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishment of a genotyping criteria for Bandavirus dabieense and confirmation of new genotypes.

Bandavirus dabieense (DBV) causes severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, which has a mortality rate of 6.18% of 27%. DBV has been classified into five to six genotypes using phylogenetic analyses. However, the absence of clear standards poses challenges in identifying new genotypes. We performed evolutionary and homology analyses using the sequences from GenBank and analysed nucleotide differences between the different genotypes. Nucleotide differences within the same genotype were mostly below 3%, whereas those between different genotypes ranged from 3 to 7%. Consequently, we established and validated a specific genotyping criterion for DBV using phylogenetic tree analysis with a 3% cut-off value and identified 8, 11, and 11 genotypes in the S, M, and L segments, respectively. Furthermore, we compared our method with the previous genotyping methods to elucidate the convenience and advantages of using a 3% cut-off value. Importantly, we also identified new genotypes and fragment reassortments in DBV using our new genotyping criterion. Additionally, we established two simplified genotyping methods for the rapid typing of DBV in clinical settings and demonstrated the existence of geographical and clinical variations among the different genotypes. Our findings provide a more reliable foundation for clinical typing of DBV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信