醋酸与三种消毒剂对医院高接触表面分离细菌抑菌活性的比较

IF 2.3 Q2 BIOLOGY
Scientifica Pub Date : 2025-03-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/sci5/7598027
Ayesha Muazzam, Sidrah Saleem, Hafiz Muhammad Faizan Nadem, Faiz Ul Haq, Ghaniya Ali, Nida Javed
{"title":"醋酸与三种消毒剂对医院高接触表面分离细菌抑菌活性的比较","authors":"Ayesha Muazzam, Sidrah Saleem, Hafiz Muhammad Faizan Nadem, Faiz Ul Haq, Ghaniya Ali, Nida Javed","doi":"10.1155/sci5/7598027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acetic acid, a readily available and less toxic alternative to conventional disinfectants, is widely used for cleaning in household settings. This study evaluates the antibacterial efficacy of acetic acid against bacteria isolated from hospital high-touch surfaces, comparing its performance to commonly used disinfectants, including phenol, sodium hypochlorite, and didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC). A total of 120 samples were collected from high-touch surfaces in specialized patient areas. The antibacterial activity of acetic acid, phenol, sodium hypochlorite, and DDAC was assessed using the standard broth microdilution method against the isolated bacterial strains. From the 120 samples, 140 bacterial isolates were obtained. Acetic acid demonstrated strong antibacterial activity, with mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.05 ± 0.00 to 0.25 ± 0.06 μL/mL, effectively inhibiting coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i> (CONS), <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Proteus vulgaris</i>, <i>Enterococcus</i> species, and <i>Serratia marcescens</i>. Its performance surpassed phenol and DDAC against these strains. Phenol exhibited higher MICs (0.50 ± 0.00 to 0.83 ± 0.10 μL/mL), indicating lower efficacy, while DDAC (0.06 ± 0.00 to 0.17 ± 0.04 μL/mL) and sodium hypochlorite (0.06 ± 0.00 to 0.10 ± 0.00 μL/mL) demonstrated comparable antibacterial effects. Phenol and sodium hypochlorite were found nonsignificant, while DDAC is highly effective at a concentration of 8.5%. Hospital surfaces were found to be contaminated with diverse bacterial strains. Acetic acid demonstrated significant antibacterial efficacy against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, with MICs ranging from 0.05 ± 0.00 to 0.25 ± 0.06 μL/mL, suggesting its potential as an effective, economical, and less toxic alternative to conventional disinfectants.</p>","PeriodicalId":21726,"journal":{"name":"Scientifica","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7598027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of Acetic Acid in Comparison With Three Disinfectants Against Bacteria Isolated From Hospital High-Touch Surfaces.\",\"authors\":\"Ayesha Muazzam, Sidrah Saleem, Hafiz Muhammad Faizan Nadem, Faiz Ul Haq, Ghaniya Ali, Nida Javed\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/sci5/7598027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acetic acid, a readily available and less toxic alternative to conventional disinfectants, is widely used for cleaning in household settings. This study evaluates the antibacterial efficacy of acetic acid against bacteria isolated from hospital high-touch surfaces, comparing its performance to commonly used disinfectants, including phenol, sodium hypochlorite, and didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC). A total of 120 samples were collected from high-touch surfaces in specialized patient areas. The antibacterial activity of acetic acid, phenol, sodium hypochlorite, and DDAC was assessed using the standard broth microdilution method against the isolated bacterial strains. From the 120 samples, 140 bacterial isolates were obtained. Acetic acid demonstrated strong antibacterial activity, with mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.05 ± 0.00 to 0.25 ± 0.06 μL/mL, effectively inhibiting coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i> (CONS), <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Proteus vulgaris</i>, <i>Enterococcus</i> species, and <i>Serratia marcescens</i>. Its performance surpassed phenol and DDAC against these strains. Phenol exhibited higher MICs (0.50 ± 0.00 to 0.83 ± 0.10 μL/mL), indicating lower efficacy, while DDAC (0.06 ± 0.00 to 0.17 ± 0.04 μL/mL) and sodium hypochlorite (0.06 ± 0.00 to 0.10 ± 0.00 μL/mL) demonstrated comparable antibacterial effects. Phenol and sodium hypochlorite were found nonsignificant, while DDAC is highly effective at a concentration of 8.5%. Hospital surfaces were found to be contaminated with diverse bacterial strains. Acetic acid demonstrated significant antibacterial efficacy against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, with MICs ranging from 0.05 ± 0.00 to 0.25 ± 0.06 μL/mL, suggesting its potential as an effective, economical, and less toxic alternative to conventional disinfectants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientifica\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"7598027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964715/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientifica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/sci5/7598027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/sci5/7598027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

醋酸是一种易于获得且毒性较低的传统消毒剂替代品,被广泛用于家庭清洁。本研究评估了乙酸对医院高接触表面分离细菌的抗菌效果,并将其与常用消毒剂(包括苯酚、次氯酸钠和二烷基二甲基氯化铵(DDAC))的性能进行了比较。从专业患者区域的高接触表面共收集了120个样本。采用标准肉汤微量稀释法对分离菌株进行醋酸、苯酚、次氯酸钠和DDAC的抑菌活性评价。从120份样品中分离出140株细菌。醋酸具有较强的抑菌活性,平均最低抑菌浓度(mic)在0.05±0.00 ~ 0.25±0.06 μL/mL之间,对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(con)、肺炎克雷伯菌、普通变形杆菌、肠球菌和粘质沙雷菌均有较好的抑制作用。其抗氧化性能优于苯酚和DDAC。苯酚的mic值较高(0.50±0.00 ~ 0.83±0.10 μL/mL),抑菌效果较差,而DDAC(0.06±0.00 ~ 0.17±0.04 μL/mL)和次氯酸钠(0.06±0.00 ~ 0.10±0.00 μL/mL)抑菌效果相当。苯酚和次氯酸钠无显著性,而DDAC在8.5%浓度下有效。医院的表面被发现被各种细菌菌株污染。醋酸对革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌均有显著的抑菌效果,其mic值在0.05±0.00 ~ 0.25±0.06 μL/mL之间,表明醋酸是一种有效、经济、低毒的传统消毒剂替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of Acetic Acid in Comparison With Three Disinfectants Against Bacteria Isolated From Hospital High-Touch Surfaces.

Acetic acid, a readily available and less toxic alternative to conventional disinfectants, is widely used for cleaning in household settings. This study evaluates the antibacterial efficacy of acetic acid against bacteria isolated from hospital high-touch surfaces, comparing its performance to commonly used disinfectants, including phenol, sodium hypochlorite, and didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC). A total of 120 samples were collected from high-touch surfaces in specialized patient areas. The antibacterial activity of acetic acid, phenol, sodium hypochlorite, and DDAC was assessed using the standard broth microdilution method against the isolated bacterial strains. From the 120 samples, 140 bacterial isolates were obtained. Acetic acid demonstrated strong antibacterial activity, with mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.05 ± 0.00 to 0.25 ± 0.06 μL/mL, effectively inhibiting coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CONS), Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris, Enterococcus species, and Serratia marcescens. Its performance surpassed phenol and DDAC against these strains. Phenol exhibited higher MICs (0.50 ± 0.00 to 0.83 ± 0.10 μL/mL), indicating lower efficacy, while DDAC (0.06 ± 0.00 to 0.17 ± 0.04 μL/mL) and sodium hypochlorite (0.06 ± 0.00 to 0.10 ± 0.00 μL/mL) demonstrated comparable antibacterial effects. Phenol and sodium hypochlorite were found nonsignificant, while DDAC is highly effective at a concentration of 8.5%. Hospital surfaces were found to be contaminated with diverse bacterial strains. Acetic acid demonstrated significant antibacterial efficacy against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, with MICs ranging from 0.05 ± 0.00 to 0.25 ± 0.06 μL/mL, suggesting its potential as an effective, economical, and less toxic alternative to conventional disinfectants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientifica
Scientifica BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Scientifica is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in the life sciences, environmental sciences, health sciences, and medicine. The journal is divided into the 65 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信