老年人力量稳定性与功能的关系:一项meta分析的系统综述。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Maria Alejandra Camacho-Villa, Manuel A Giráldez-García, Marta Sevilla-Sanchez, Sonia L Rivera-Mejía, Eduardo Carballeira
{"title":"老年人力量稳定性与功能的关系:一项meta分析的系统综述。","authors":"Maria Alejandra Camacho-Villa, Manuel A Giráldez-García, Marta Sevilla-Sanchez, Sonia L Rivera-Mejía, Eduardo Carballeira","doi":"10.1111/sms.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relevance of force steadiness (FS) in relation to task performance remains unclear. This systematic review with meta-analysis examines the strength of the relationship between FS and the physical task performance aspect of functionality in older adults, focusing on both upper and lower limbs. We conducted a comprehensive search across databases, including MEDLINE, Ovid, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to February 2024. We included correlations from observational or longitudinal studies that provided objective measures of task performance in both healthy and unhealthy older adults. A meta-analysis with robust variance estimation was performed to account for dependencies among effect sizes. Of 1293 studies screened, 21 met the inclusion criteria and 15 contributed data to the meta-analysis. Our findings revealed a moderate, statistically significant relationship between FS and task performance in the upper limbs (r = 0.58, 95% CI [0.49-0.65], p < 0.01) with negligible heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). For the lower limbs, the relationship was also moderate (r = 0.45, 95% CI [0.27-0.58], p < 0.01) but with moderate heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 50.66%). These results highlight a notable association between FS and physical function in both upper and lower limbs. However, caution is warranted due to the moderate to high risk of bias in 13 studies and evidence of publication bias in studies focused on the upper limbs. Despite these limitations, our study emphasizes the importance of FS in clinical practice and underscores the need for improved methods in measuring FS and its link to physical function. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021247720.</p>","PeriodicalId":21466,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","volume":"35 4","pages":"e70040"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between Force Steadiness and Functionality in Older Adults: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Alejandra Camacho-Villa, Manuel A Giráldez-García, Marta Sevilla-Sanchez, Sonia L Rivera-Mejía, Eduardo Carballeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sms.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The relevance of force steadiness (FS) in relation to task performance remains unclear. This systematic review with meta-analysis examines the strength of the relationship between FS and the physical task performance aspect of functionality in older adults, focusing on both upper and lower limbs. We conducted a comprehensive search across databases, including MEDLINE, Ovid, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to February 2024. We included correlations from observational or longitudinal studies that provided objective measures of task performance in both healthy and unhealthy older adults. A meta-analysis with robust variance estimation was performed to account for dependencies among effect sizes. Of 1293 studies screened, 21 met the inclusion criteria and 15 contributed data to the meta-analysis. Our findings revealed a moderate, statistically significant relationship between FS and task performance in the upper limbs (r = 0.58, 95% CI [0.49-0.65], p < 0.01) with negligible heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). For the lower limbs, the relationship was also moderate (r = 0.45, 95% CI [0.27-0.58], p < 0.01) but with moderate heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 50.66%). These results highlight a notable association between FS and physical function in both upper and lower limbs. However, caution is warranted due to the moderate to high risk of bias in 13 studies and evidence of publication bias in studies focused on the upper limbs. Despite these limitations, our study emphasizes the importance of FS in clinical practice and underscores the need for improved methods in measuring FS and its link to physical function. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021247720.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"e70040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

力稳定性(FS)与任务绩效的相关性尚不清楚。本系统综述采用荟萃分析研究了FS与老年人身体功能任务表现之间的关系强度,重点是上肢和下肢。我们进行了全面的数据库检索,包括MEDLINE, Ovid, CINAHL, Scopus和Web of Science,截止到2024年2月。我们纳入了来自观察性或纵向研究的相关性,这些研究提供了健康和不健康老年人任务表现的客观衡量标准。采用稳健方差估计的荟萃分析来解释效应大小之间的依赖性。在筛选的1293项研究中,21项符合纳入标准,15项为meta分析提供了数据。我们的研究结果显示,FS与上肢任务表现之间存在中度的、统计学上显著的关系(r = 0.58, 95% CI [0.49-0.65], p 2 = 0%)。下肢的相关性也为中等(r = 0.45, 95% CI [0.27-0.58], p = 50.66%)。这些结果突出了FS与上肢和下肢身体功能之间的显著关联。然而,由于13项研究存在中度至高度偏倚风险,并且有证据表明,针对上肢的研究存在发表偏倚,因此需要谨慎。尽管存在这些局限性,我们的研究强调了FS在临床实践中的重要性,并强调了改进测量FS的方法及其与身体功能的联系的必要性。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42021247720。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship Between Force Steadiness and Functionality in Older Adults: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

The relevance of force steadiness (FS) in relation to task performance remains unclear. This systematic review with meta-analysis examines the strength of the relationship between FS and the physical task performance aspect of functionality in older adults, focusing on both upper and lower limbs. We conducted a comprehensive search across databases, including MEDLINE, Ovid, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to February 2024. We included correlations from observational or longitudinal studies that provided objective measures of task performance in both healthy and unhealthy older adults. A meta-analysis with robust variance estimation was performed to account for dependencies among effect sizes. Of 1293 studies screened, 21 met the inclusion criteria and 15 contributed data to the meta-analysis. Our findings revealed a moderate, statistically significant relationship between FS and task performance in the upper limbs (r = 0.58, 95% CI [0.49-0.65], p < 0.01) with negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). For the lower limbs, the relationship was also moderate (r = 0.45, 95% CI [0.27-0.58], p < 0.01) but with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 50.66%). These results highlight a notable association between FS and physical function in both upper and lower limbs. However, caution is warranted due to the moderate to high risk of bias in 13 studies and evidence of publication bias in studies focused on the upper limbs. Despite these limitations, our study emphasizes the importance of FS in clinical practice and underscores the need for improved methods in measuring FS and its link to physical function. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021247720.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
162
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports is a multidisciplinary journal published 12 times per year under the auspices of the Scandinavian Foundation of Medicine and Science in Sports. It aims to publish high quality and impactful articles in the fields of orthopaedics, rehabilitation and sports medicine, exercise physiology and biochemistry, biomechanics and motor control, health and disease relating to sport, exercise and physical activity, as well as on the social and behavioural aspects of sport and exercise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信