亲科学信念:分析思维与认知价值的作用。

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sinem Yilmaz, Tomas Ståhl
{"title":"亲科学信念:分析思维与认知价值的作用。","authors":"Sinem Yilmaz, Tomas Ståhl","doi":"10.1111/sjop.13114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present research examined whether analytic thinking and valuing rationality predict pro-science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine. We hypothesized that analytic thinking would be more strongly positively associated with pro-science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine among people who strongly (vs. weakly) value being rational. In two studies, participants (N<sub>S1</sub> = 470 and N<sub>S2</sub> = 512) completed measures of analytic thinking, valuing rationality, pro-science belief, and skepticism toward alternative medicine. We used hierarchical regression analyses to test our hypotheses. In Study 1, there was a stronger association between analytic thinking and both science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine among those who strongly (vs. weakly) value being rational. In Study 2, the stronger association between analytic thinking and skepticism toward alternative medicine among those who strongly (vs. weakly) value being rational remained, but we did not replicate results from Study 1 on science beliefs. Pooled analyses across the two studies provided support for both of our hypotheses. Analytic thinking is particularly strongly associated with pro-science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine among people who value being rational. These findings highlight that both motivational and cognitive factors contribute to evidence-based beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21435,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pro-Science Beliefs: The Role of Analytic Thinking and Epistemic Values.\",\"authors\":\"Sinem Yilmaz, Tomas Ståhl\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sjop.13114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present research examined whether analytic thinking and valuing rationality predict pro-science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine. We hypothesized that analytic thinking would be more strongly positively associated with pro-science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine among people who strongly (vs. weakly) value being rational. In two studies, participants (N<sub>S1</sub> = 470 and N<sub>S2</sub> = 512) completed measures of analytic thinking, valuing rationality, pro-science belief, and skepticism toward alternative medicine. We used hierarchical regression analyses to test our hypotheses. In Study 1, there was a stronger association between analytic thinking and both science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine among those who strongly (vs. weakly) value being rational. In Study 2, the stronger association between analytic thinking and skepticism toward alternative medicine among those who strongly (vs. weakly) value being rational remained, but we did not replicate results from Study 1 on science beliefs. Pooled analyses across the two studies provided support for both of our hypotheses. Analytic thinking is particularly strongly associated with pro-science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine among people who value being rational. These findings highlight that both motivational and cognitive factors contribute to evidence-based beliefs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.13114\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.13114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了分析思维和重视理性是否预示着对替代医学的亲科学信仰和怀疑态度。我们假设,在那些强烈(相对较弱)重视理性的人群中,分析思维与亲科学信仰和对替代医学的怀疑态度之间的正相关程度更强。在两项研究中,参与者(NS1 = 470和NS2 = 512)完成了分析思维、重视理性、亲科学信仰和对替代医学的怀疑态度的测量。我们使用层次回归分析来检验我们的假设。在研究1中,在那些强烈(相对较弱)重视理性的人中,分析思维与科学信仰和对替代医学的怀疑之间存在更强的联系。在研究2中,在那些强烈(相对于弱)重视理性的人中,分析思维和对替代医学的怀疑之间的更强关联仍然存在,但我们没有复制研究1中关于科学信仰的结果。两项研究的汇总分析为我们的两个假设提供了支持。在重视理性的人群中,分析性思维与支持科学的信仰和对替代医学的怀疑密切相关。这些发现强调了动机和认知因素都有助于以证据为基础的信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pro-Science Beliefs: The Role of Analytic Thinking and Epistemic Values.

The present research examined whether analytic thinking and valuing rationality predict pro-science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine. We hypothesized that analytic thinking would be more strongly positively associated with pro-science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine among people who strongly (vs. weakly) value being rational. In two studies, participants (NS1 = 470 and NS2 = 512) completed measures of analytic thinking, valuing rationality, pro-science belief, and skepticism toward alternative medicine. We used hierarchical regression analyses to test our hypotheses. In Study 1, there was a stronger association between analytic thinking and both science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine among those who strongly (vs. weakly) value being rational. In Study 2, the stronger association between analytic thinking and skepticism toward alternative medicine among those who strongly (vs. weakly) value being rational remained, but we did not replicate results from Study 1 on science beliefs. Pooled analyses across the two studies provided support for both of our hypotheses. Analytic thinking is particularly strongly associated with pro-science beliefs and skepticism toward alternative medicine among people who value being rational. These findings highlight that both motivational and cognitive factors contribute to evidence-based beliefs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of psychology
Scandinavian journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Published in association with the Nordic psychological associations, the Scandinavian Journal of Psychology publishes original papers from Scandinavia and elsewhere. Covering the whole range of psychology, with a particular focus on experimental psychology, the journal includes high-quality theoretical and methodological papers, empirical reports, reviews and ongoing commentaries.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology is organised into four standing subsections: - Cognition and Neurosciences - Development and Aging - Personality and Social Sciences - Health and Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信