Hampus Andersson, Alexander Bremer, Florin Gandor, Georg Ebersbach, Matthias Löhle, Per Odin, Alexander Storch
{"title":"同时出现的非运动症状不会影响帕金森病运动日记的一般有效性,但会影响其解释。","authors":"Hampus Andersson, Alexander Bremer, Florin Gandor, Georg Ebersbach, Matthias Löhle, Per Odin, Alexander Storch","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motor fluctuations are routinely documented using the Parkinson's disease (PD) home diary. However, the validity of this diary when compared to clinical observers is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study disassembled the effects of nonmotor symptoms (NMS) on inter-method agreement between the PD home motor diary and clinical observers (outside validity criterion).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational VALIDATE-PD cohort study in advanced PD assessing symptom severity by simultaneous hourly ratings using the home diary (Off, On, dyskinetic state) and a nonmotor diary (11 key NMSs) was performed. Test validity measures (accuracy and Cohen's κ) were compared between hours with and without co-occurring NMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred eighty-seven hourly time periods from 47 participants were analyzed. Inter-method agreement (accuracy, Cohen's κ) of the motor diary was independent of co-occurring NMSs, but simultaneous NMSs inversely influence false ratings of motor Off and On states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simultaneously occurring NMSs do not affect general validity but the interpretation of the PD home motor diary.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous Nonmotor Symptoms Do Not Affect General Validity but Interpretation of the Parkinson's Disease Motor Diary.\",\"authors\":\"Hampus Andersson, Alexander Bremer, Florin Gandor, Georg Ebersbach, Matthias Löhle, Per Odin, Alexander Storch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mdc3.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motor fluctuations are routinely documented using the Parkinson's disease (PD) home diary. However, the validity of this diary when compared to clinical observers is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study disassembled the effects of nonmotor symptoms (NMS) on inter-method agreement between the PD home motor diary and clinical observers (outside validity criterion).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational VALIDATE-PD cohort study in advanced PD assessing symptom severity by simultaneous hourly ratings using the home diary (Off, On, dyskinetic state) and a nonmotor diary (11 key NMSs) was performed. Test validity measures (accuracy and Cohen's κ) were compared between hours with and without co-occurring NMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred eighty-seven hourly time periods from 47 participants were analyzed. Inter-method agreement (accuracy, Cohen's κ) of the motor diary was independent of co-occurring NMSs, but simultaneous NMSs inversely influence false ratings of motor Off and On states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simultaneously occurring NMSs do not affect general validity but the interpretation of the PD home motor diary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simultaneous Nonmotor Symptoms Do Not Affect General Validity but Interpretation of the Parkinson's Disease Motor Diary.
Background: Motor fluctuations are routinely documented using the Parkinson's disease (PD) home diary. However, the validity of this diary when compared to clinical observers is limited.
Objective: This study disassembled the effects of nonmotor symptoms (NMS) on inter-method agreement between the PD home motor diary and clinical observers (outside validity criterion).
Methods: A prospective observational VALIDATE-PD cohort study in advanced PD assessing symptom severity by simultaneous hourly ratings using the home diary (Off, On, dyskinetic state) and a nonmotor diary (11 key NMSs) was performed. Test validity measures (accuracy and Cohen's κ) were compared between hours with and without co-occurring NMS.
Results: Four hundred eighty-seven hourly time periods from 47 participants were analyzed. Inter-method agreement (accuracy, Cohen's κ) of the motor diary was independent of co-occurring NMSs, but simultaneous NMSs inversely influence false ratings of motor Off and On states.
Conclusions: Simultaneously occurring NMSs do not affect general validity but the interpretation of the PD home motor diary.
期刊介绍:
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)