同时出现的非运动症状不会影响帕金森病运动日记的一般有效性,但会影响其解释。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hampus Andersson, Alexander Bremer, Florin Gandor, Georg Ebersbach, Matthias Löhle, Per Odin, Alexander Storch
{"title":"同时出现的非运动症状不会影响帕金森病运动日记的一般有效性,但会影响其解释。","authors":"Hampus Andersson, Alexander Bremer, Florin Gandor, Georg Ebersbach, Matthias Löhle, Per Odin, Alexander Storch","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motor fluctuations are routinely documented using the Parkinson's disease (PD) home diary. However, the validity of this diary when compared to clinical observers is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study disassembled the effects of nonmotor symptoms (NMS) on inter-method agreement between the PD home motor diary and clinical observers (outside validity criterion).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational VALIDATE-PD cohort study in advanced PD assessing symptom severity by simultaneous hourly ratings using the home diary (Off, On, dyskinetic state) and a nonmotor diary (11 key NMSs) was performed. Test validity measures (accuracy and Cohen's κ) were compared between hours with and without co-occurring NMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred eighty-seven hourly time periods from 47 participants were analyzed. Inter-method agreement (accuracy, Cohen's κ) of the motor diary was independent of co-occurring NMSs, but simultaneous NMSs inversely influence false ratings of motor Off and On states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simultaneously occurring NMSs do not affect general validity but the interpretation of the PD home motor diary.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous Nonmotor Symptoms Do Not Affect General Validity but Interpretation of the Parkinson's Disease Motor Diary.\",\"authors\":\"Hampus Andersson, Alexander Bremer, Florin Gandor, Georg Ebersbach, Matthias Löhle, Per Odin, Alexander Storch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mdc3.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motor fluctuations are routinely documented using the Parkinson's disease (PD) home diary. However, the validity of this diary when compared to clinical observers is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study disassembled the effects of nonmotor symptoms (NMS) on inter-method agreement between the PD home motor diary and clinical observers (outside validity criterion).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational VALIDATE-PD cohort study in advanced PD assessing symptom severity by simultaneous hourly ratings using the home diary (Off, On, dyskinetic state) and a nonmotor diary (11 key NMSs) was performed. Test validity measures (accuracy and Cohen's κ) were compared between hours with and without co-occurring NMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred eighty-seven hourly time periods from 47 participants were analyzed. Inter-method agreement (accuracy, Cohen's κ) of the motor diary was independent of co-occurring NMSs, but simultaneous NMSs inversely influence false ratings of motor Off and On states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simultaneously occurring NMSs do not affect general validity but the interpretation of the PD home motor diary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:运动波动是帕金森病(PD)家庭日记的常规记录。然而,与临床观察相比,该日记的有效性是有限的。目的:探讨非运动症状(NMS)对PD家庭运动日记与临床观察者(外部效度标准)方法间一致性的影响。方法:对晚期PD患者进行前瞻性观察性VALIDATE-PD队列研究,通过使用家庭日记(关闭、打开、运动障碍状态)和非运动日记(11个关键NMSs)同时进行每小时评分来评估症状严重程度。在有和没有同时发生NMS的小时之间比较测试效度测量(准确性和Cohen's κ)。结果:对47名参与者的487个小时时段进行了分析。运动日志的方法间一致性(准确性,Cohen’s κ)与共同发生的NMSs无关,但同时发生的NMSs对运动Off和On状态的错误评级呈负相关。结论:同时发生的NMSs不影响一般效度,但影响PD家庭运动日记的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simultaneous Nonmotor Symptoms Do Not Affect General Validity but Interpretation of the Parkinson's Disease Motor Diary.

Background: Motor fluctuations are routinely documented using the Parkinson's disease (PD) home diary. However, the validity of this diary when compared to clinical observers is limited.

Objective: This study disassembled the effects of nonmotor symptoms (NMS) on inter-method agreement between the PD home motor diary and clinical observers (outside validity criterion).

Methods: A prospective observational VALIDATE-PD cohort study in advanced PD assessing symptom severity by simultaneous hourly ratings using the home diary (Off, On, dyskinetic state) and a nonmotor diary (11 key NMSs) was performed. Test validity measures (accuracy and Cohen's κ) were compared between hours with and without co-occurring NMS.

Results: Four hundred eighty-seven hourly time periods from 47 participants were analyzed. Inter-method agreement (accuracy, Cohen's κ) of the motor diary was independent of co-occurring NMSs, but simultaneous NMSs inversely influence false ratings of motor Off and On states.

Conclusions: Simultaneously occurring NMSs do not affect general validity but the interpretation of the PD home motor diary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信