Jasmin H Pizer, Katherine A Hernandez, Stephen L Aita, Vasilios C Ikonomou, Melissa A Myers, Nanako A Hawley, Kyle M Brasil, Nicholas C Borgogna, Jamie A Spiegel, Todd A Smitherman, Benjamin D Hill
{"title":"小儿原发性头痛疾病的神经心理功能:荟萃分析。","authors":"Jasmin H Pizer, Katherine A Hernandez, Stephen L Aita, Vasilios C Ikonomou, Melissa A Myers, Nanako A Hawley, Kyle M Brasil, Nicholas C Borgogna, Jamie A Spiegel, Todd A Smitherman, Benjamin D Hill","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-067838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether neuropsychological functioning was impaired among individuals with pediatric primary headache disorders (PHD) compared with individuals without headaches. Adults with migraine appear to evidence deficits in neuropsychological performance, but few reviews have examined whether cognitive performance is impaired among children and adolescents with primary headache disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>we considered studies using a validated clinical neuropsychological measure among pediatric samples (<20-y old) that included a phd and control sample. two authors independently reviewed candidate articles to determine inclusion and to extract data. data were pooled using random-effects models. data sources: pubmed, embase, proquest health & medical, proquest psychology database, and psycinfo were searched from inception to february 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 16 included studies indicated significantly worse overall neuropsychological performance among pediatric PHD (g = -0.31; 95% CI = -0.44 to -0.17), as well as significantly worse performance across the motor, executive function, learning/memory, language, processing speed, intelligence, and visuospatial/construction domains, as compared with nonheadache controls. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 43.13%) but analyses of publication bias and moderators were not significant. Sensitivity analyses indicated that negative effects were driven by samples with migraine and not observed among tension-type headache (TTH) samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative to controls without headache, pediatric samples with migraine demonstrate worse neurocognitive performance both generally and across specific domains. A small number of studies among samples with TTH were included and moderator analyses were likely underpowered.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychological Functioning in Pediatric Primary Headache Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin H Pizer, Katherine A Hernandez, Stephen L Aita, Vasilios C Ikonomou, Melissa A Myers, Nanako A Hawley, Kyle M Brasil, Nicholas C Borgogna, Jamie A Spiegel, Todd A Smitherman, Benjamin D Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2024-067838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether neuropsychological functioning was impaired among individuals with pediatric primary headache disorders (PHD) compared with individuals without headaches. Adults with migraine appear to evidence deficits in neuropsychological performance, but few reviews have examined whether cognitive performance is impaired among children and adolescents with primary headache disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>we considered studies using a validated clinical neuropsychological measure among pediatric samples (<20-y old) that included a phd and control sample. two authors independently reviewed candidate articles to determine inclusion and to extract data. data were pooled using random-effects models. data sources: pubmed, embase, proquest health & medical, proquest psychology database, and psycinfo were searched from inception to february 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 16 included studies indicated significantly worse overall neuropsychological performance among pediatric PHD (g = -0.31; 95% CI = -0.44 to -0.17), as well as significantly worse performance across the motor, executive function, learning/memory, language, processing speed, intelligence, and visuospatial/construction domains, as compared with nonheadache controls. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 43.13%) but analyses of publication bias and moderators were not significant. Sensitivity analyses indicated that negative effects were driven by samples with migraine and not observed among tension-type headache (TTH) samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative to controls without headache, pediatric samples with migraine demonstrate worse neurocognitive performance both generally and across specific domains. A small number of studies among samples with TTH were included and moderator analyses were likely underpowered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-067838\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-067838","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价小儿原发性头痛障碍(PHD)患者与无头痛患者相比,其神经心理功能是否受损。患有偏头痛的成人似乎在神经心理表现方面存在缺陷,但很少有综述研究患有原发性头痛疾病的儿童和青少年的认知表现是否受损。方法:我们考虑了在儿科样本中使用经过验证的临床神经心理学测量的研究(结果:对16项纳入研究的分析表明,儿科博士的整体神经心理学表现明显较差(g = -0.31;95% CI = -0.44至-0.17),并且在运动、执行功能、学习/记忆、语言、处理速度、智力和视觉空间/构建领域的表现明显不如非头痛对照组。观察到中度异质性(I2 = 43.13%),但发表偏倚和调节因子的分析不显著。敏感性分析表明,负面影响是由偏头痛患者引起的,而在紧张性头痛(TTH)患者中没有观察到。结论:与没有头痛的对照组相比,患有偏头痛的儿童样本在总体和特定领域表现出更差的神经认知表现。在TTH样本中纳入了少量研究,调节因子分析可能不够有力。
Neuropsychological Functioning in Pediatric Primary Headache Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.
Objective: To evaluate whether neuropsychological functioning was impaired among individuals with pediatric primary headache disorders (PHD) compared with individuals without headaches. Adults with migraine appear to evidence deficits in neuropsychological performance, but few reviews have examined whether cognitive performance is impaired among children and adolescents with primary headache disorders.
Methods: we considered studies using a validated clinical neuropsychological measure among pediatric samples (<20-y old) that included a phd and control sample. two authors independently reviewed candidate articles to determine inclusion and to extract data. data were pooled using random-effects models. data sources: pubmed, embase, proquest health & medical, proquest psychology database, and psycinfo were searched from inception to february 2024.
Results: Analysis of 16 included studies indicated significantly worse overall neuropsychological performance among pediatric PHD (g = -0.31; 95% CI = -0.44 to -0.17), as well as significantly worse performance across the motor, executive function, learning/memory, language, processing speed, intelligence, and visuospatial/construction domains, as compared with nonheadache controls. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 43.13%) but analyses of publication bias and moderators were not significant. Sensitivity analyses indicated that negative effects were driven by samples with migraine and not observed among tension-type headache (TTH) samples.
Conclusions: Relative to controls without headache, pediatric samples with migraine demonstrate worse neurocognitive performance both generally and across specific domains. A small number of studies among samples with TTH were included and moderator analyses were likely underpowered.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.