Thierry G Meerbothe, Kyu-Jin Jung, Chuanjiang Cui, Dong-Hyun Kim, Cornelis A T van den Berg, Stefano Mandija
{"title":"基于 B 1 + 预测的电特性层析成像重建评估。","authors":"Thierry G Meerbothe, Kyu-Jin Jung, Chuanjiang Cui, Dong-Hyun Kim, Cornelis A T van den Berg, Stefano Mandija","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In MR electrical properties tomography (EPT), conductivity and permittivity are reconstructed from MR measurements. However, depending on the reconstruction method, reconstructed electrical properties (EPs) show large variability in vivo, reducing confidence in the reconstructed values for clinical application in practice. To overcome this problem we present a method to evaluate the reconstructed EPs using a physics-based <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> estimation model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A physics-based method using a finite difference based recurrent relation is used to estimate the <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> field from a set of given EPs and the boundary of the measured <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> field. Reconstructed EPs can be evaluated by comparing the estimated <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> field with the measured <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> field. The method was first validated in simulations and afterward tested using MRI data from phantoms and in vivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The simulation experiments show that the <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> field can be accurately estimated, within 90 s for a typical brain at 1 mm<sup>3</sup> isotropic resolution, when correct EPs are used as input. When incorrect EPs are used as input the estimated <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> fields shows differences with the measured <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> fields. These differences directly correspond to the errors in the underlying EPs, enabling detection of errors in the reconstructions. The results obtained in MRI experiments using phantoms and in vivo show the applicability of the method in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the proposed method, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> fields can be accurately estimated from EPs. This approach can be used to evaluate EPT reconstructions and consequently gain more confidence in reconstructed EPs values in vivo.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<ArticleTitle xmlns:ns0=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\">Electrical properties based <ns0:math> <ns0:mrow><ns0:msubsup><ns0:mi>B</ns0:mi> <ns0:mn>1</ns0:mn> <ns0:mo>+</ns0:mo></ns0:msubsup> </ns0:mrow> </ns0:math> prediction for electrical properties tomography reconstruction evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Thierry G Meerbothe, Kyu-Jin Jung, Chuanjiang Cui, Dong-Hyun Kim, Cornelis A T van den Berg, Stefano Mandija\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mrm.30520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In MR electrical properties tomography (EPT), conductivity and permittivity are reconstructed from MR measurements. However, depending on the reconstruction method, reconstructed electrical properties (EPs) show large variability in vivo, reducing confidence in the reconstructed values for clinical application in practice. To overcome this problem we present a method to evaluate the reconstructed EPs using a physics-based <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> estimation model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A physics-based method using a finite difference based recurrent relation is used to estimate the <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> field from a set of given EPs and the boundary of the measured <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> field. Reconstructed EPs can be evaluated by comparing the estimated <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> field with the measured <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> field. The method was first validated in simulations and afterward tested using MRI data from phantoms and in vivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The simulation experiments show that the <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> field can be accurately estimated, within 90 s for a typical brain at 1 mm<sup>3</sup> isotropic resolution, when correct EPs are used as input. When incorrect EPs are used as input the estimated <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> fields shows differences with the measured <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> fields. These differences directly correspond to the errors in the underlying EPs, enabling detection of errors in the reconstructions. The results obtained in MRI experiments using phantoms and in vivo show the applicability of the method in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the proposed method, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> fields can be accurately estimated from EPs. This approach can be used to evaluate EPT reconstructions and consequently gain more confidence in reconstructed EPs values in vivo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30520\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30520","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrical properties based B1+ prediction for electrical properties tomography reconstruction evaluation.
Purpose: In MR electrical properties tomography (EPT), conductivity and permittivity are reconstructed from MR measurements. However, depending on the reconstruction method, reconstructed electrical properties (EPs) show large variability in vivo, reducing confidence in the reconstructed values for clinical application in practice. To overcome this problem we present a method to evaluate the reconstructed EPs using a physics-based estimation model.
Methods: A physics-based method using a finite difference based recurrent relation is used to estimate the field from a set of given EPs and the boundary of the measured field. Reconstructed EPs can be evaluated by comparing the estimated field with the measured field. The method was first validated in simulations and afterward tested using MRI data from phantoms and in vivo.
Results: The simulation experiments show that the field can be accurately estimated, within 90 s for a typical brain at 1 mm3 isotropic resolution, when correct EPs are used as input. When incorrect EPs are used as input the estimated fields shows differences with the measured fields. These differences directly correspond to the errors in the underlying EPs, enabling detection of errors in the reconstructions. The results obtained in MRI experiments using phantoms and in vivo show the applicability of the method in practice.
Conclusion: With the proposed method, fields can be accurately estimated from EPs. This approach can be used to evaluate EPT reconstructions and consequently gain more confidence in reconstructed EPs values in vivo.
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.