根据病因,取栓后卒中的程序和临床结果:来自全国登记的结果。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ilaria Casetta, Giovanni Pracucci, Valentina Saia, Enrico Fainardi, Fabrizio Sallustio, Bruno Del Sette, Tiziana Benzi Markushi, Orazio Buonomo, Ludovica Ferraù, Mauro Bergui, Paolo Cerrato, Sandra Bracco, Rossana Tassi, Stefano Vallone, Guido Bigliardi, Guido A Lazzarotti, Nicola Giannini, Leonardo Renieri, Patrizia Nencini, Daniele Romano, Rosa Napoletano, Simone Galluzzo, Andrea Zini, Roberto Menozzi, Alessandro Pezzini, Nicolò Mandruzzato, Manuel Cappellari, Maria Ruggiero, Marco Longoni, Sergio Nappini, Federico Mazzacane, Nicola Burdi, Giovanni Boero, Nicola Cavasin, Adriana Critelli, Andrea Calzoni, Tiziana Tassinari, Andrea Saletti, Cristiano Azzini, Valerio Da Ros, Giordano Lacidogna, Domenico S Zimatore, Marco Petruzzellis, Davide Castellano, Andrea Naldi, Francesco Biraschi, Ettore Nicolini, Alessio Comai, Elisa Dall' Ora, Emilio Lozupone, Marcella Caggiula, Ivan Gallesio, Delfina Ferrandi, Marco Perri, Simona Sacco, Michele Besana, Alessia Giossi, Giuseppe Carità, Monia Russo, Gianluca Galvano, Eleonora Saracco, Marco Pavia, Paolo Invernizzi, Marco Filizzolo, Marina Mannino, Edoardo Puglielli, Alfonsina Casalena, Salvatore Mangiafico, Danilo Toni
{"title":"根据病因,取栓后卒中的程序和临床结果:来自全国登记的结果。","authors":"Ilaria Casetta, Giovanni Pracucci, Valentina Saia, Enrico Fainardi, Fabrizio Sallustio, Bruno Del Sette, Tiziana Benzi Markushi, Orazio Buonomo, Ludovica Ferraù, Mauro Bergui, Paolo Cerrato, Sandra Bracco, Rossana Tassi, Stefano Vallone, Guido Bigliardi, Guido A Lazzarotti, Nicola Giannini, Leonardo Renieri, Patrizia Nencini, Daniele Romano, Rosa Napoletano, Simone Galluzzo, Andrea Zini, Roberto Menozzi, Alessandro Pezzini, Nicolò Mandruzzato, Manuel Cappellari, Maria Ruggiero, Marco Longoni, Sergio Nappini, Federico Mazzacane, Nicola Burdi, Giovanni Boero, Nicola Cavasin, Adriana Critelli, Andrea Calzoni, Tiziana Tassinari, Andrea Saletti, Cristiano Azzini, Valerio Da Ros, Giordano Lacidogna, Domenico S Zimatore, Marco Petruzzellis, Davide Castellano, Andrea Naldi, Francesco Biraschi, Ettore Nicolini, Alessio Comai, Elisa Dall' Ora, Emilio Lozupone, Marcella Caggiula, Ivan Gallesio, Delfina Ferrandi, Marco Perri, Simona Sacco, Michele Besana, Alessia Giossi, Giuseppe Carità, Monia Russo, Gianluca Galvano, Eleonora Saracco, Marco Pavia, Paolo Invernizzi, Marco Filizzolo, Marina Mannino, Edoardo Puglielli, Alfonsina Casalena, Salvatore Mangiafico, Danilo Toni","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13026-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of stroke etiology on outcomes in patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is still a matter of debate. We studied the effect of aterosclerotic versus cardioembolic etiology on the clinical and radiological outcome of patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with EVT on a large sample of stroke patients enrolled in a nationwide registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The source of data was the Italian Registry of Endovascular Stroke Treatments, a national, prospective, observational internet-based registry including patients treated with EVT since 2011. We extracted and compared data of patients suffering from large atherosclerosis (LAA) or cardioembolic (CE) stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 5193 patients, 3899 CE, and 1294 LAA stroke. Patients with CE were significantly older (p < 0.001), and their stroke severity at admission was significantly higher (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with LAA had significantly longer onset to end of procedure time, and procedure duration than CE patients. Good outcome at three months was reported in 45.2% of LAA and 45.4% of CE patients (p = 0.89). In the multivariable analysis, patients with CE had higher odds of achieving successful (OR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.35-1.92) or complete (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.21-1.62) recanalization Futile recanalization was detected more frequently in CE patients (OR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.18-1.61). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes (mRS 02: OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.92-1.36). LAA patients had higher odds of sICH (OR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.49-0.85). The shift analysis showed a trend toward a better outcome in CE patients (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99-1.35), which was statistically significant in subjects with anterior circulation stroke. (OR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.04-1.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study showed a better chance of successful recanalization in CE patients, a slightly better outcome in CE patients with anterior circulation stroke after adjusting for baseline confounders, despite their more unfavourable risk factor profile, and a higher chance of futile recanalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 4","pages":"308"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procedural and Clinical Outcome of Stroke after thrombectomy according to etiology: results from a nationwide registry.\",\"authors\":\"Ilaria Casetta, Giovanni Pracucci, Valentina Saia, Enrico Fainardi, Fabrizio Sallustio, Bruno Del Sette, Tiziana Benzi Markushi, Orazio Buonomo, Ludovica Ferraù, Mauro Bergui, Paolo Cerrato, Sandra Bracco, Rossana Tassi, Stefano Vallone, Guido Bigliardi, Guido A Lazzarotti, Nicola Giannini, Leonardo Renieri, Patrizia Nencini, Daniele Romano, Rosa Napoletano, Simone Galluzzo, Andrea Zini, Roberto Menozzi, Alessandro Pezzini, Nicolò Mandruzzato, Manuel Cappellari, Maria Ruggiero, Marco Longoni, Sergio Nappini, Federico Mazzacane, Nicola Burdi, Giovanni Boero, Nicola Cavasin, Adriana Critelli, Andrea Calzoni, Tiziana Tassinari, Andrea Saletti, Cristiano Azzini, Valerio Da Ros, Giordano Lacidogna, Domenico S Zimatore, Marco Petruzzellis, Davide Castellano, Andrea Naldi, Francesco Biraschi, Ettore Nicolini, Alessio Comai, Elisa Dall' Ora, Emilio Lozupone, Marcella Caggiula, Ivan Gallesio, Delfina Ferrandi, Marco Perri, Simona Sacco, Michele Besana, Alessia Giossi, Giuseppe Carità, Monia Russo, Gianluca Galvano, Eleonora Saracco, Marco Pavia, Paolo Invernizzi, Marco Filizzolo, Marina Mannino, Edoardo Puglielli, Alfonsina Casalena, Salvatore Mangiafico, Danilo Toni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13026-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of stroke etiology on outcomes in patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is still a matter of debate. We studied the effect of aterosclerotic versus cardioembolic etiology on the clinical and radiological outcome of patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with EVT on a large sample of stroke patients enrolled in a nationwide registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The source of data was the Italian Registry of Endovascular Stroke Treatments, a national, prospective, observational internet-based registry including patients treated with EVT since 2011. We extracted and compared data of patients suffering from large atherosclerosis (LAA) or cardioembolic (CE) stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 5193 patients, 3899 CE, and 1294 LAA stroke. Patients with CE were significantly older (p < 0.001), and their stroke severity at admission was significantly higher (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with LAA had significantly longer onset to end of procedure time, and procedure duration than CE patients. Good outcome at three months was reported in 45.2% of LAA and 45.4% of CE patients (p = 0.89). In the multivariable analysis, patients with CE had higher odds of achieving successful (OR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.35-1.92) or complete (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.21-1.62) recanalization Futile recanalization was detected more frequently in CE patients (OR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.18-1.61). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes (mRS 02: OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.92-1.36). LAA patients had higher odds of sICH (OR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.49-0.85). The shift analysis showed a trend toward a better outcome in CE patients (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99-1.35), which was statistically significant in subjects with anterior circulation stroke. (OR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.04-1.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study showed a better chance of successful recanalization in CE patients, a slightly better outcome in CE patients with anterior circulation stroke after adjusting for baseline confounders, despite their more unfavourable risk factor profile, and a higher chance of futile recanalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 4\",\"pages\":\"308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13026-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13026-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卒中病因对血管内血栓切除术(EVT)患者预后的影响仍存在争议。我们研究了动脉粥样硬化与心脏栓塞的病因学对EVT治疗大血管闭塞(LVO)脑卒中患者临床和影像学结果的影响,研究对象是全国登记的大样本脑卒中患者。方法:数据来源于意大利血管内卒中治疗登记处,这是一个全国性的、前瞻性的、基于互联网的观察性登记处,包括自2011年以来接受EVT治疗的患者。我们提取并比较了患有大动脉粥样硬化(LAA)或心脏栓塞(CE)中风的患者的数据。结果:我们纳入了5193例患者,3899例CE和1294例LAA卒中。结论:该研究显示,CE患者成功再通的机会更好,在调整基线混杂因素后,CE合并前循环卒中患者的结果略好,尽管他们的危险因素更不利,并且再通无效的机会更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Procedural and Clinical Outcome of Stroke after thrombectomy according to etiology: results from a nationwide registry.

Background: The impact of stroke etiology on outcomes in patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is still a matter of debate. We studied the effect of aterosclerotic versus cardioembolic etiology on the clinical and radiological outcome of patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with EVT on a large sample of stroke patients enrolled in a nationwide registry.

Methods: The source of data was the Italian Registry of Endovascular Stroke Treatments, a national, prospective, observational internet-based registry including patients treated with EVT since 2011. We extracted and compared data of patients suffering from large atherosclerosis (LAA) or cardioembolic (CE) stroke.

Results: We included 5193 patients, 3899 CE, and 1294 LAA stroke. Patients with CE were significantly older (p < 0.001), and their stroke severity at admission was significantly higher (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with LAA had significantly longer onset to end of procedure time, and procedure duration than CE patients. Good outcome at three months was reported in 45.2% of LAA and 45.4% of CE patients (p = 0.89). In the multivariable analysis, patients with CE had higher odds of achieving successful (OR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.35-1.92) or complete (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.21-1.62) recanalization Futile recanalization was detected more frequently in CE patients (OR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.18-1.61). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes (mRS 02: OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.92-1.36). LAA patients had higher odds of sICH (OR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.49-0.85). The shift analysis showed a trend toward a better outcome in CE patients (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99-1.35), which was statistically significant in subjects with anterior circulation stroke. (OR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.04-1.35).

Conclusions: The study showed a better chance of successful recanalization in CE patients, a slightly better outcome in CE patients with anterior circulation stroke after adjusting for baseline confounders, despite their more unfavourable risk factor profile, and a higher chance of futile recanalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信