有跟腱病和没有跟腱病的人跟腱下硬度不同。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Marion Crouzier, Stéphane Baudry, Benedicte Vanwanseele
{"title":"有跟腱病和没有跟腱病的人跟腱下硬度不同。","authors":"Marion Crouzier, Stéphane Baudry, Benedicte Vanwanseele","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Previous work showed altered mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in the presence of tendinopathy, considering the Achilles tendon as a homogeneous structure with the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) subtendon representative of it. However, the Achilles tendon consists of three semi-independent structures: the GM, gastrocnemius lateralis (GL), and soleus (SOL) subtendons, each independently pulled by their respective muscle. The aim of this study was (i) to compare the mechanical properties of the different Achilles subtendons in humans in vivo by considering the force of each muscle within the triceps surae group and (ii) to determine whether the loss of stiffness in the presence of tendinopathy is specific to individual subtendons. We hypothesized that (i) stiffness would differ between subtendons in healthy participants and that (ii) the loss of stiffness in people with Achilles tendinopathy compared with healthy controls would not affect the three subtendons identically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen participants with tendinopathy and 14 controls performed ramped isometric plantarflexions. Simultaneously, the elongation of the three subtendons was recorded, and an estimate of the force pulling on each was made (from muscle activation and volume). Stiffness was calculated from the individual muscle index of force-subtendon elongation relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that regardless of the group, SOL stiffness was significantly higher than stiffness of both gastrocnemii (muscle effect: P < 0.001). A muscle-group interaction showed specific loss of stiffness of GL in Achilles tendinopathy compared with controls ( P = 0.029, d = 1.3), with no between-group difference for GM or SOL (both P > 0.925, d = 0.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the hypothesis that the biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon differ between subtendons and further shows that the loss of stiffness in Achilles tendinopathy is specific to the GL subtendon.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"1636-1645"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achilles Subtendons Stiffness Differ in People with and without Achilles Tendinopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Marion Crouzier, Stéphane Baudry, Benedicte Vanwanseele\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Previous work showed altered mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in the presence of tendinopathy, considering the Achilles tendon as a homogeneous structure with the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) subtendon representative of it. However, the Achilles tendon consists of three semi-independent structures: the GM, gastrocnemius lateralis (GL), and soleus (SOL) subtendons, each independently pulled by their respective muscle. The aim of this study was (i) to compare the mechanical properties of the different Achilles subtendons in humans in vivo by considering the force of each muscle within the triceps surae group and (ii) to determine whether the loss of stiffness in the presence of tendinopathy is specific to individual subtendons. We hypothesized that (i) stiffness would differ between subtendons in healthy participants and that (ii) the loss of stiffness in people with Achilles tendinopathy compared with healthy controls would not affect the three subtendons identically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen participants with tendinopathy and 14 controls performed ramped isometric plantarflexions. Simultaneously, the elongation of the three subtendons was recorded, and an estimate of the force pulling on each was made (from muscle activation and volume). Stiffness was calculated from the individual muscle index of force-subtendon elongation relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that regardless of the group, SOL stiffness was significantly higher than stiffness of both gastrocnemii (muscle effect: P < 0.001). A muscle-group interaction showed specific loss of stiffness of GL in Achilles tendinopathy compared with controls ( P = 0.029, d = 1.3), with no between-group difference for GM or SOL (both P > 0.925, d = 0.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the hypothesis that the biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon differ between subtendons and further shows that the loss of stiffness in Achilles tendinopathy is specific to the GL subtendon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1636-1645\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003717\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003717","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:先前的研究表明,跟腱是一个均匀的结构,以腓肠肌内侧(GM)亚腱为代表,存在肌腱病变时跟腱的力学特性发生了改变。然而,跟腱由三个半独立的结构组成:GM、腓肠肌外侧(GL)和比目鱼肌(SOL)次肌腱,每一个都由各自的肌肉独立牵引。本研究的目的是:(i)通过考虑肱三头肌群内每块肌肉的力量来比较人类体内不同跟腱的力学特性;(ii)确定存在肌腱病变时的刚度丧失是否仅针对单个跟腱。我们假设(i)健康参与者的下肌腱硬度会有所不同,(ii)跟腱病患者与健康对照组相比,僵硬度的丧失不会对三个下肌腱产生相同的影响。方法:14名患有肌腱病变的参与者和14名对照组进行倾斜等距跖屈。同时,记录三个下肌腱的伸长率,并对每个下肌腱的拉力进行估计(从肌肉激活和体积)。刚度由力-下肌腱伸长关系的单个肌肉指数计算。结果:结果显示,无论在哪个组,SOL僵硬度明显高于双腓肠肌僵硬度(肌肉效应:p < 0.001)。肌肉x组相互作用显示,与对照组相比,跟腱病变的GL僵硬度特异性下降(p = 0.029, d = 1.3), GM或SOL组间无差异(p均为0.0.925,d = 0.3)。结论:本研究支持了跟腱各次肌腱的生物力学特性不同的假设,并进一步表明跟腱病的僵硬丧失是GL下肌腱特有的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Achilles Subtendons Stiffness Differ in People with and without Achilles Tendinopathy.

Purpose: Previous work showed altered mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in the presence of tendinopathy, considering the Achilles tendon as a homogeneous structure with the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) subtendon representative of it. However, the Achilles tendon consists of three semi-independent structures: the GM, gastrocnemius lateralis (GL), and soleus (SOL) subtendons, each independently pulled by their respective muscle. The aim of this study was (i) to compare the mechanical properties of the different Achilles subtendons in humans in vivo by considering the force of each muscle within the triceps surae group and (ii) to determine whether the loss of stiffness in the presence of tendinopathy is specific to individual subtendons. We hypothesized that (i) stiffness would differ between subtendons in healthy participants and that (ii) the loss of stiffness in people with Achilles tendinopathy compared with healthy controls would not affect the three subtendons identically.

Methods: Fourteen participants with tendinopathy and 14 controls performed ramped isometric plantarflexions. Simultaneously, the elongation of the three subtendons was recorded, and an estimate of the force pulling on each was made (from muscle activation and volume). Stiffness was calculated from the individual muscle index of force-subtendon elongation relationships.

Results: Results showed that regardless of the group, SOL stiffness was significantly higher than stiffness of both gastrocnemii (muscle effect: P < 0.001). A muscle-group interaction showed specific loss of stiffness of GL in Achilles tendinopathy compared with controls ( P = 0.029, d = 1.3), with no between-group difference for GM or SOL (both P > 0.925, d = 0.3).

Conclusions: This study supports the hypothesis that the biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon differ between subtendons and further shows that the loss of stiffness in Achilles tendinopathy is specific to the GL subtendon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信