己酮茶碱对部分二氧化碳激光治疗烧伤疤痕患者的疗效、安全性、耐受性和治疗满意度的影响:一项先导盲法随机对照试验。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sara Dilmaghani, Elham Behrangi, Pardis Hejazi, Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan, Masoumeh Roohaninasab, Arash Pour Mohammad, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Farnoosh Seirafianpour, Azadeh Goodarzi
{"title":"己酮茶碱对部分二氧化碳激光治疗烧伤疤痕患者的疗效、安全性、耐受性和治疗满意度的影响:一项先导盲法随机对照试验。","authors":"Sara Dilmaghani, Elham Behrangi, Pardis Hejazi, Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan, Masoumeh Roohaninasab, Arash Pour Mohammad, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Farnoosh Seirafianpour, Azadeh Goodarzi","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04328-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn scars are significant consequence of thermal burn injuries, causing cosmetic concerns and potentially leading to symptomatic discomfort or functional limitations; therefore, continuous adoption of novel methods is warranted to improve outcomes. This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness, safety, and satisfaction of fractional CO2 laser treatment alone versus its combination with oral pentoxifylline at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily for four months in patients with hypertrophic/keloid burn scars. In a assessor and analyst blinded randomized controlled trial, patients with hypertrophic/keloidal thermal burn scars were allocated into two intervention groups. Both groups underwent treatment with a fractional CO2 laser, while one group additionally received oral pentoxifylline at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily for four months. The assessment of scar improvement was performed using the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) at baseline and during subsequent follow-up sessions. Significant improvements were noted within both groups, with mVSS scores decreasing from 7.73 to 4.73 in the CO2 laser group and from 7.36 to 3.91 in the combination therapy group (p < 0.001 for both). However, the between-group difference in mVSS score reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.39). Confidence intervals for the mean change in mVSS scores from baseline to endpoint were [2.45, 3.10] for the CO2 laser group and [3.15, 3.85] for the combination therapy group. The combination therapy group also showed a more pronounced improvement in pigmentation subscore of mVSS and higher patient satisfaction rates. No adverse effects were reported in either group. Fractional CO2 laser with or without Pentoxifylline appears to be an effective and safe option for the improvement of hypertrophic/keloidal burn scars. Patient satisfaction seems to increase when the laser is combined with oral Pentoxifylline. Nevertheless, further studies involving larger patient cohorts are warranted to draw more robust conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of pentoxifylline on efficacy, safety, tolerability, and treatment satisfaction of fractional carbon dioxide laser in patients with burn scars: a pilot blinded randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Dilmaghani, Elham Behrangi, Pardis Hejazi, Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan, Masoumeh Roohaninasab, Arash Pour Mohammad, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Farnoosh Seirafianpour, Azadeh Goodarzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10103-025-04328-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Burn scars are significant consequence of thermal burn injuries, causing cosmetic concerns and potentially leading to symptomatic discomfort or functional limitations; therefore, continuous adoption of novel methods is warranted to improve outcomes. This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness, safety, and satisfaction of fractional CO2 laser treatment alone versus its combination with oral pentoxifylline at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily for four months in patients with hypertrophic/keloid burn scars. In a assessor and analyst blinded randomized controlled trial, patients with hypertrophic/keloidal thermal burn scars were allocated into two intervention groups. Both groups underwent treatment with a fractional CO2 laser, while one group additionally received oral pentoxifylline at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily for four months. The assessment of scar improvement was performed using the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) at baseline and during subsequent follow-up sessions. Significant improvements were noted within both groups, with mVSS scores decreasing from 7.73 to 4.73 in the CO2 laser group and from 7.36 to 3.91 in the combination therapy group (p < 0.001 for both). However, the between-group difference in mVSS score reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.39). Confidence intervals for the mean change in mVSS scores from baseline to endpoint were [2.45, 3.10] for the CO2 laser group and [3.15, 3.85] for the combination therapy group. The combination therapy group also showed a more pronounced improvement in pigmentation subscore of mVSS and higher patient satisfaction rates. No adverse effects were reported in either group. Fractional CO2 laser with or without Pentoxifylline appears to be an effective and safe option for the improvement of hypertrophic/keloidal burn scars. Patient satisfaction seems to increase when the laser is combined with oral Pentoxifylline. Nevertheless, further studies involving larger patient cohorts are warranted to draw more robust conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04328-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04328-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烧伤疤痕是热烧伤的重要后果,引起美容问题,并可能导致症状性不适或功能限制;因此,不断采用新的方法是必要的,以改善结果。本研究旨在评估和比较部分CO2激光单独治疗与口服己酮茶碱联合治疗的有效性、安全性和满意度,剂量为400 mg,每天两次,持续4个月。在一项评估员和分析师的盲法随机对照试验中,肥厚/瘢痕样热烧伤疤痕患者被分为两个干预组。两组均接受CO2激光治疗,其中一组额外接受口服己酮茶碱,剂量为400毫克,每天两次,持续4个月。在基线和随后的随访期间,使用改良的温哥华疤痕量表(mVSS)评估疤痕改善情况。两组均有显著改善,CO2激光组的mVSS评分从7.73降至4.73,联合治疗组的mVSS评分从7.36降至3.91
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of pentoxifylline on efficacy, safety, tolerability, and treatment satisfaction of fractional carbon dioxide laser in patients with burn scars: a pilot blinded randomized controlled trial.

Burn scars are significant consequence of thermal burn injuries, causing cosmetic concerns and potentially leading to symptomatic discomfort or functional limitations; therefore, continuous adoption of novel methods is warranted to improve outcomes. This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness, safety, and satisfaction of fractional CO2 laser treatment alone versus its combination with oral pentoxifylline at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily for four months in patients with hypertrophic/keloid burn scars. In a assessor and analyst blinded randomized controlled trial, patients with hypertrophic/keloidal thermal burn scars were allocated into two intervention groups. Both groups underwent treatment with a fractional CO2 laser, while one group additionally received oral pentoxifylline at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily for four months. The assessment of scar improvement was performed using the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) at baseline and during subsequent follow-up sessions. Significant improvements were noted within both groups, with mVSS scores decreasing from 7.73 to 4.73 in the CO2 laser group and from 7.36 to 3.91 in the combination therapy group (p < 0.001 for both). However, the between-group difference in mVSS score reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.39). Confidence intervals for the mean change in mVSS scores from baseline to endpoint were [2.45, 3.10] for the CO2 laser group and [3.15, 3.85] for the combination therapy group. The combination therapy group also showed a more pronounced improvement in pigmentation subscore of mVSS and higher patient satisfaction rates. No adverse effects were reported in either group. Fractional CO2 laser with or without Pentoxifylline appears to be an effective and safe option for the improvement of hypertrophic/keloidal burn scars. Patient satisfaction seems to increase when the laser is combined with oral Pentoxifylline. Nevertheless, further studies involving larger patient cohorts are warranted to draw more robust conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信