动机访谈-认知行为联合疗法逆转多发性硬化症患者药物依从性的作用机制。

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Rachel Schoor, Jared M. Bruce, Vincent S. Staggs, Andrew T. Fox, Amanda Bruce, Sharon Lynch, Delwyn Catley
{"title":"动机访谈-认知行为联合疗法逆转多发性硬化症患者药物依从性的作用机制。","authors":"Rachel Schoor,&nbsp;Jared M. Bruce,&nbsp;Vincent S. Staggs,&nbsp;Andrew T. Fox,&nbsp;Amanda Bruce,&nbsp;Sharon Lynch,&nbsp;Delwyn Catley","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Despite disease modifying therapies' (DMT) demonstrated efficacy for treating relapsing MS, around 40% of patients discontinue use. This study aimed to understand the mechanism of action of Motivational Interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy (MI-CBT) in a previously conducted randomized controlled trial in which the MI-CBT intervention successfully promoted DMT re-initiation of participants compared to a treatment as usual (TAU) condition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This secondary analysis (<i>N</i> = 91) explored changes in motivation (a single item motivation “ruler” [Mot∆], and the Brief Motivation Scale [BMS∆]), autonomous motivation (AR∆), personal control (PC∆), treatment control (TC∆), and confidence to reinitiate (Con∆) as potential mediators of the treatment effect, using logistic regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Logistic regression analysis including all potential mediators as predictors of initiation indicated the BMS∆ was the only statistically significant predictor (<i>OR</i> = 1.61, <i>p</i> = 0.010). When BMS∆ was removed Mot∆ (<i>OR</i> = 1.22, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and PC∆ (<i>OR</i> = 1.67, <i>p</i> = 0.002) were statistically significant predictors of initiation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The MI-CBT intervention appeared to work primarily by increasing motivation to initiate DMT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"81 7","pages":"609-618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms of Action of Combination Motivational Interviewing-Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Reversing Medication Non-Adherence in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Schoor,&nbsp;Jared M. Bruce,&nbsp;Vincent S. Staggs,&nbsp;Andrew T. Fox,&nbsp;Amanda Bruce,&nbsp;Sharon Lynch,&nbsp;Delwyn Catley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.23796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite disease modifying therapies' (DMT) demonstrated efficacy for treating relapsing MS, around 40% of patients discontinue use. This study aimed to understand the mechanism of action of Motivational Interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy (MI-CBT) in a previously conducted randomized controlled trial in which the MI-CBT intervention successfully promoted DMT re-initiation of participants compared to a treatment as usual (TAU) condition.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This secondary analysis (<i>N</i> = 91) explored changes in motivation (a single item motivation “ruler” [Mot∆], and the Brief Motivation Scale [BMS∆]), autonomous motivation (AR∆), personal control (PC∆), treatment control (TC∆), and confidence to reinitiate (Con∆) as potential mediators of the treatment effect, using logistic regression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Logistic regression analysis including all potential mediators as predictors of initiation indicated the BMS∆ was the only statistically significant predictor (<i>OR</i> = 1.61, <i>p</i> = 0.010). When BMS∆ was removed Mot∆ (<i>OR</i> = 1.22, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and PC∆ (<i>OR</i> = 1.67, <i>p</i> = 0.002) were statistically significant predictors of initiation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The MI-CBT intervention appeared to work primarily by increasing motivation to initiate DMT.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"81 7\",\"pages\":\"609-618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23796\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23796","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管疾病修饰疗法(DMT)对治疗复发性MS有疗效,但约40%的患者停止使用。本研究旨在了解动机访谈加认知行为治疗(MI-CBT)的作用机制,在一项先前进行的随机对照试验中,与常规治疗(TAU)相比,MI-CBT干预成功地促进了参与者的DMT重新启动。方法:本二次分析(N = 91)采用logistic回归探讨了动机(单项动机“标尺”[Mot∆]和简短动机量表[BMS∆])、自主动机(AR∆)、个人控制(PC∆)、治疗控制(TC∆)和重新启动信心(Con∆)的变化作为治疗效果的潜在中介。结果:包括所有潜在介质在内的Logistic回归分析表明,BMS∆是唯一具有统计学意义的预测因子(OR = 1.61, p = 0.010)。当移除BMS∆时,Mot∆(OR = 1.22, p = 0.002)和PC∆(OR = 1.67, p = 0.002)是有统计学意义的起始预测因子。结论:MI-CBT干预似乎主要通过增加启动DMT的动机而起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanisms of Action of Combination Motivational Interviewing-Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Reversing Medication Non-Adherence in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Objective

Despite disease modifying therapies' (DMT) demonstrated efficacy for treating relapsing MS, around 40% of patients discontinue use. This study aimed to understand the mechanism of action of Motivational Interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy (MI-CBT) in a previously conducted randomized controlled trial in which the MI-CBT intervention successfully promoted DMT re-initiation of participants compared to a treatment as usual (TAU) condition.

Methods

This secondary analysis (N = 91) explored changes in motivation (a single item motivation “ruler” [Mot∆], and the Brief Motivation Scale [BMS∆]), autonomous motivation (AR∆), personal control (PC∆), treatment control (TC∆), and confidence to reinitiate (Con∆) as potential mediators of the treatment effect, using logistic regression.

Results

Logistic regression analysis including all potential mediators as predictors of initiation indicated the BMS∆ was the only statistically significant predictor (OR = 1.61, p = 0.010). When BMS∆ was removed Mot∆ (OR = 1.22, p = 0.002) and PC∆ (OR = 1.67, p = 0.002) were statistically significant predictors of initiation.

Conclusion

The MI-CBT intervention appeared to work primarily by increasing motivation to initiate DMT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信