水泥遮光剂对增材制造永久冠材料光学性能的影响。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jasmina Singh, Andrew B Cameron, Joanne Jung Eun Choi
{"title":"水泥遮光剂对增材制造永久冠材料光学性能的影响。","authors":"Jasmina Singh, Andrew B Cameron, Joanne Jung Eun Choi","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effect of cement shade and printing parameters on the optical properties of additively manufactured (AM) permanent crown materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two AM crown materials (Bego VarseoSmile Crown Plus and Formlabs Permanent Crown) and one conventional milled material were tested (n = 560). Dimensions for each specimen measured 10 × 10 mm and were categorized by thickness (1 and 2 mm). AM materials were additively manufactured (3D-printed) at three orientations: 0°, 45° and 90°. Specimens were cemented with four shades of dual-cure cement: light, neutral, warm, and translucent. Color change (ΔE) and translucency parameter (TP) measurements were calculated utilizing a spectrophotometer, VITA EasyShade V. Data was analyzed with a two- way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neutral cement shade exhibited the lowest ΔE overall (2.30 ± 0.43). Translucent cement shade exhibited the least color difference between materials. Milled materials generally exhibited higher ΔE (5.57 ± 0.26-7.17 ± 0.33) than AM materials. Material thickness significantly affected the ΔE across all shades of cement (p < 0.05). 45° print orientation for 2 mm thick specimens exhibited the greatest clinically acceptable ΔE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cement shade may cause clinically unacceptable color changes based on material choice and 3D-printing parameters. Clinicians providing permanent AM crowns must consider the impact of cement shade and printing parameters on aesthetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Cement Shade on the Optical Properties of Additively Manufactured Permanent Crown Materials.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmina Singh, Andrew B Cameron, Joanne Jung Eun Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effect of cement shade and printing parameters on the optical properties of additively manufactured (AM) permanent crown materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two AM crown materials (Bego VarseoSmile Crown Plus and Formlabs Permanent Crown) and one conventional milled material were tested (n = 560). Dimensions for each specimen measured 10 × 10 mm and were categorized by thickness (1 and 2 mm). AM materials were additively manufactured (3D-printed) at three orientations: 0°, 45° and 90°. Specimens were cemented with four shades of dual-cure cement: light, neutral, warm, and translucent. Color change (ΔE) and translucency parameter (TP) measurements were calculated utilizing a spectrophotometer, VITA EasyShade V. Data was analyzed with a two- way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neutral cement shade exhibited the lowest ΔE overall (2.30 ± 0.43). Translucent cement shade exhibited the least color difference between materials. Milled materials generally exhibited higher ΔE (5.57 ± 0.26-7.17 ± 0.33) than AM materials. Material thickness significantly affected the ΔE across all shades of cement (p < 0.05). 45° print orientation for 2 mm thick specimens exhibited the greatest clinically acceptable ΔE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cement shade may cause clinically unacceptable color changes based on material choice and 3D-printing parameters. Clinicians providing permanent AM crowns must consider the impact of cement shade and printing parameters on aesthetic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13475\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨水泥荫蔽和打印参数对增材制造(AM)永久冠材料光学性能的影响。方法:对两种AM冠材料(Bego VarseoSmile crown Plus和Formlabs Permanent crown)和一种常规铣削材料(n = 560)进行测试。每个标本的尺寸为10 × 10毫米,并按厚度(1和2毫米)分类。AM材料在0°、45°和90°三个方向上进行增材制造(3d打印)。标本用四种颜色的双固化水泥胶结:浅色、中性、暖色和半透明。颜色变化(ΔE)和半透明参数(TP)测量使用分光光度计,VITA EasyShade v进行计算。数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行分析。结果:中性水泥荫蔽整体最低ΔE(2.30±0.43)。半透明水泥遮光材料之间的色差最小。铣削材料的ΔE值(5.57±0.26-7.17±0.33)普遍高于AM材料。材料厚度显著影响ΔE所有颜色的水泥(p结论:根据材料选择和3d打印参数,水泥颜色可能会导致临床不可接受的颜色变化。提供永久性AM冠的临床医生必须考虑水泥阴影和打印参数对美学结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Cement Shade on the Optical Properties of Additively Manufactured Permanent Crown Materials.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of cement shade and printing parameters on the optical properties of additively manufactured (AM) permanent crown materials.

Methods: Two AM crown materials (Bego VarseoSmile Crown Plus and Formlabs Permanent Crown) and one conventional milled material were tested (n = 560). Dimensions for each specimen measured 10 × 10 mm and were categorized by thickness (1 and 2 mm). AM materials were additively manufactured (3D-printed) at three orientations: 0°, 45° and 90°. Specimens were cemented with four shades of dual-cure cement: light, neutral, warm, and translucent. Color change (ΔE) and translucency parameter (TP) measurements were calculated utilizing a spectrophotometer, VITA EasyShade V. Data was analyzed with a two- way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests.

Results: Neutral cement shade exhibited the lowest ΔE overall (2.30 ± 0.43). Translucent cement shade exhibited the least color difference between materials. Milled materials generally exhibited higher ΔE (5.57 ± 0.26-7.17 ± 0.33) than AM materials. Material thickness significantly affected the ΔE across all shades of cement (p < 0.05). 45° print orientation for 2 mm thick specimens exhibited the greatest clinically acceptable ΔE.

Conclusion: Cement shade may cause clinically unacceptable color changes based on material choice and 3D-printing parameters. Clinicians providing permanent AM crowns must consider the impact of cement shade and printing parameters on aesthetic outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信