口服液中合成大麻素受体激动剂:液相色谱-质谱检测分散液液微萃取(DLLME)方法的建立。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Henrique Silva Bombana, Gabriela de Paula Meirelles, Rodrigo Alves de Oliveira, Vilma Leyton, Mauricio Yonamine
{"title":"口服液中合成大麻素受体激动剂:液相色谱-质谱检测分散液液微萃取(DLLME)方法的建立。","authors":"Henrique Silva Bombana, Gabriela de Paula Meirelles, Rodrigo Alves de Oliveira, Vilma Leyton, Mauricio Yonamine","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) comprise a class of new psychoactive substances (NPS) that rank second in terms of notified substances to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Moreover, SCRAs are the most prevalent NPS in Brazilian territory. Given the risks they pose to public health, there is a pressing need to develop simple and rapid sample preparation methods in alternative biological matrices that are easy to handle and collect, such as oral fluid (OF). In this study, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) was employed to determine twelve SCRAs in OF. For 200 µL of sample (mixture of OF and Quantisal™ buffer), 200 µL of ice-cold acetonitrile were used as the dispersive solvent, and 100 µL of ethyl acetate were used as the extraction solvent. The limits of detection ranged from 0.5 to 2 ng/mL, while the limits of quantification were 2 ng/mL for ADB-FUBIATA and 1 ng/mL for the other analytes. The working range was 1-100 ng/mL, except for ADB-FUBIATA, which had a range of 2-100 ng/mL. The coefficients of variation for quantified analytes were <11.3% for within-run precision, <12.6% for between-run precision, and <15.8% for accuracy across all controls. The developed method was applied to six suspected samples, and one sample yielded a positive result with 39.9 ng/mL of MDMB-4en-PINACA, the most prevalent SCRA in São Paulo State, Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthetic cannabinoids receptor agonists in oral fluid: development of a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) method with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry detection.\",\"authors\":\"Henrique Silva Bombana, Gabriela de Paula Meirelles, Rodrigo Alves de Oliveira, Vilma Leyton, Mauricio Yonamine\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkaf027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) comprise a class of new psychoactive substances (NPS) that rank second in terms of notified substances to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Moreover, SCRAs are the most prevalent NPS in Brazilian territory. Given the risks they pose to public health, there is a pressing need to develop simple and rapid sample preparation methods in alternative biological matrices that are easy to handle and collect, such as oral fluid (OF). In this study, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) was employed to determine twelve SCRAs in OF. For 200 µL of sample (mixture of OF and Quantisal™ buffer), 200 µL of ice-cold acetonitrile were used as the dispersive solvent, and 100 µL of ethyl acetate were used as the extraction solvent. The limits of detection ranged from 0.5 to 2 ng/mL, while the limits of quantification were 2 ng/mL for ADB-FUBIATA and 1 ng/mL for the other analytes. The working range was 1-100 ng/mL, except for ADB-FUBIATA, which had a range of 2-100 ng/mL. The coefficients of variation for quantified analytes were <11.3% for within-run precision, <12.6% for between-run precision, and <15.8% for accuracy across all controls. The developed method was applied to six suspected samples, and one sample yielded a positive result with 39.9 ng/mL of MDMB-4en-PINACA, the most prevalent SCRA in São Paulo State, Brazil.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

合成大麻素受体激动剂(scra)是一类新的精神活性物质(NPS),在向联合国毒品和犯罪问题办公室通报的物质中排名第二。此外,scra是巴西境内最普遍的NPS。鉴于它们对公共卫生构成的风险,迫切需要开发简单和快速的样品制备方法,使用易于处理和收集的替代生物基质,例如口腔液。本研究采用分散液液微萃取法(DLLME)测定OF OF中12种SCRAs。200µL样品(of与Quantisal™缓冲液的混合物),以200µL冰凉的乙腈作为分散溶剂,100µL乙酸乙酯作为萃取溶剂。检测限为0.5 ~ 2ng /mL,定量限为ADB-FUBIATA为2ng /mL,其他分析物为1ng /mL。除ADB-FUBIATA在2-100 ng/mL范围外,工作范围为1-100 ng/mL。定量分析物的变异系数为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synthetic cannabinoids receptor agonists in oral fluid: development of a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) method with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry detection.

Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) comprise a class of new psychoactive substances (NPS) that rank second in terms of notified substances to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Moreover, SCRAs are the most prevalent NPS in Brazilian territory. Given the risks they pose to public health, there is a pressing need to develop simple and rapid sample preparation methods in alternative biological matrices that are easy to handle and collect, such as oral fluid (OF). In this study, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) was employed to determine twelve SCRAs in OF. For 200 µL of sample (mixture of OF and Quantisal™ buffer), 200 µL of ice-cold acetonitrile were used as the dispersive solvent, and 100 µL of ethyl acetate were used as the extraction solvent. The limits of detection ranged from 0.5 to 2 ng/mL, while the limits of quantification were 2 ng/mL for ADB-FUBIATA and 1 ng/mL for the other analytes. The working range was 1-100 ng/mL, except for ADB-FUBIATA, which had a range of 2-100 ng/mL. The coefficients of variation for quantified analytes were <11.3% for within-run precision, <12.6% for between-run precision, and <15.8% for accuracy across all controls. The developed method was applied to six suspected samples, and one sample yielded a positive result with 39.9 ng/mL of MDMB-4en-PINACA, the most prevalent SCRA in São Paulo State, Brazil.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信