优化晶状体切除术中人工晶状体度数计算的眼轴长度估算。

IF 1.9 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Sukhum Silpa-Archa, Chitchanok Samanwongthai, Variya Nganthavee, Korawin Charoensuk
{"title":"优化晶状体切除术中人工晶状体度数计算的眼轴长度估算。","authors":"Sukhum Silpa-Archa, Chitchanok Samanwongthai, Variya Nganthavee, Korawin Charoensuk","doi":"10.1186/s40942-025-00666-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate methods of preoperative axial length (AL) estimation for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in patients with macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). These methods included optical biometry, A-scan biometry, and novel decision algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted at a tertiary hospital from January 2018 to December 2023. Preoperative and postoperative AL measurements were obtained using optical biometry (IOL Master 700, Zeiss, Germany) and A-scan biometry (VuMAX, Sonomed, USA). The primary outcome was the mean absolute prediction error (MAE) between postoperative AL and preoperative estimates generated by five methods, including two novel algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 56 patients (56 eyes). The lowest MAE was achieved using the simple algorithm (0.31 ± 0.55 mm), followed by the AL of the fellow eye measured via IOL Master (0.34 ± 0.60 mm), and the advanced algorithm (0.36 ± 0.62 mm). A Kruskal-Wallis H test found no statistically significant difference in MAE across the five methods (P = 0.118). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between preoperative and postoperative AL measurements obtained with the IOL Master.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients undergoing phacovitrectomy for macula-off RRD, the simple algorithm provides accurate AL estimation for IOL power calculation. In cases where AL measurement of the affected eye is not feasible using the IOL Master, the fellow eye's AL is a reliable alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":"11 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing axial length estimation for intraocular lens power calculation in phacovitrectomy for macula-off retinal detachment.\",\"authors\":\"Sukhum Silpa-Archa, Chitchanok Samanwongthai, Variya Nganthavee, Korawin Charoensuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40942-025-00666-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate methods of preoperative axial length (AL) estimation for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in patients with macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). These methods included optical biometry, A-scan biometry, and novel decision algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted at a tertiary hospital from January 2018 to December 2023. Preoperative and postoperative AL measurements were obtained using optical biometry (IOL Master 700, Zeiss, Germany) and A-scan biometry (VuMAX, Sonomed, USA). The primary outcome was the mean absolute prediction error (MAE) between postoperative AL and preoperative estimates generated by five methods, including two novel algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 56 patients (56 eyes). The lowest MAE was achieved using the simple algorithm (0.31 ± 0.55 mm), followed by the AL of the fellow eye measured via IOL Master (0.34 ± 0.60 mm), and the advanced algorithm (0.36 ± 0.62 mm). A Kruskal-Wallis H test found no statistically significant difference in MAE across the five methods (P = 0.118). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between preoperative and postoperative AL measurements obtained with the IOL Master.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients undergoing phacovitrectomy for macula-off RRD, the simple algorithm provides accurate AL estimation for IOL power calculation. In cases where AL measurement of the affected eye is not feasible using the IOL Master, the fellow eye's AL is a reliable alternative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967035/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-025-00666-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-025-00666-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探讨无黄斑孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)患者人工晶状体(IOL)度数计算的术前轴长(AL)估计方法。这些方法包括光学生物计量、a扫描生物计量和新的决策算法。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年12月在某三级医院前瞻性收集的资料。术前和术后AL测量采用光学生物测定法(IOL Master 700,蔡司,德国)和a扫描生物测定法(VuMAX, Sonomed,美国)。主要终点是五种方法(包括两种新算法)产生的术后AL和术前估计之间的平均绝对预测误差(MAE)。结果:共纳入56例患者(56只眼)。简单法测得的人工晶状体准准度最低(0.31±0.55 mm), IOL Master法测得的准准度最低(0.34±0.60 mm),高级法测得的准准度最低(0.36±0.62 mm)。Kruskal-Wallis H检验发现,五种方法的MAE差异无统计学意义(P = 0.118)。Bland-Altman分析表明,使用IOL Master获得的术前和术后人工晶状体测量值具有良好的一致性。结论:对于黄斑脱落的RRD患者,简单的算法可为人工晶状体屈光度计算提供准确的人工晶状体屈光度估计。如果使用人工晶状体大师无法对受影响的眼睛进行人工晶状体测量,另一只眼睛的人工晶状体是一个可靠的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing axial length estimation for intraocular lens power calculation in phacovitrectomy for macula-off retinal detachment.

Background: To evaluate methods of preoperative axial length (AL) estimation for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in patients with macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). These methods included optical biometry, A-scan biometry, and novel decision algorithms.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted at a tertiary hospital from January 2018 to December 2023. Preoperative and postoperative AL measurements were obtained using optical biometry (IOL Master 700, Zeiss, Germany) and A-scan biometry (VuMAX, Sonomed, USA). The primary outcome was the mean absolute prediction error (MAE) between postoperative AL and preoperative estimates generated by five methods, including two novel algorithms.

Results: The study included 56 patients (56 eyes). The lowest MAE was achieved using the simple algorithm (0.31 ± 0.55 mm), followed by the AL of the fellow eye measured via IOL Master (0.34 ± 0.60 mm), and the advanced algorithm (0.36 ± 0.62 mm). A Kruskal-Wallis H test found no statistically significant difference in MAE across the five methods (P = 0.118). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between preoperative and postoperative AL measurements obtained with the IOL Master.

Conclusion: For patients undergoing phacovitrectomy for macula-off RRD, the simple algorithm provides accurate AL estimation for IOL power calculation. In cases where AL measurement of the affected eye is not feasible using the IOL Master, the fellow eye's AL is a reliable alternative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信