Elaina Smith, Christopher Cortez, April Wiechmann, Sandra Davis, Hannah Dyson, Krystyn Kucharski, Sarah Ross, Geoffrey Kline, Robert T Mallet, Xiangrong Shi
{"title":"Preserved learning despite impaired short-term memory in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Elaina Smith, Christopher Cortez, April Wiechmann, Sandra Davis, Hannah Dyson, Krystyn Kucharski, Sarah Ross, Geoffrey Kline, Robert T Mallet, Xiangrong Shi","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2025.1560791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) on short-term memory (STM) and learning performance assessed with different memory modalities was unknown. This study examined differences in STM and learning ability between verbal and visuospatial memory-modalities in older adults with aMCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine aMCI subjects (71.5 ± 6.0 yrs) and 33 non-MCI (control) subjects (71.1 ± 5.7 yrs) of similar age and educational attainment consented to participate in the study. Short-term memory was assessed using Digit-Span-Test (DST), California-Verbal-Learning-Test-2nd edition - short-form (CVLT-II), and Brief-Visuospatial-Memory-Test-Revised (BVMT-R); CVLT-II and BVMT-R assessed verbal-and visuospatial-learning, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DST-Backward (<i>p</i> = 0.016) and DST-Sequencing (<i>p</i> < 0.001) scores were significantly lower in the aMCI vs. control subjects (Student's t-test), but DST-Forward scores did not differ (<i>p</i> = 0.237). Immediate and delayed free-recall scores in both CVLT-II (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and BVMT-R (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were lower in the aMCI subjects. The immediate free-recall scores in both tests improved with repeated trials (two-factor ANOVA: <i>p</i> < 0.001 for trial factor) to similar extents in the aMCI and control groups with no significant interaction of the trial and group factors (<i>p</i> = 0.266 in CVLT-II and <i>p</i> = 0.239 in BVMT-R).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Amnestic MCI subjects have diminished STM but intact learning ability. Differences in STM of older adults with vs. without aMCI are more readily distinguished by word-verbal memory and/or visuospatial memory testing than digit-verbal memory testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1560791"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1560791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:用不同的记忆模式评估失忆性轻度认知障碍(aMCI)对短时记忆(STM)和学习能力的影响尚不清楚。本研究考察了患有轻度认知障碍的老年人在言语记忆和视觉空间记忆模式下的短时记忆和学习能力的差异:39 名 aMCI 受试者(71.5±6.0 岁)和 33 名非 aMCI(对照组)受试者(71.1±5.7 岁)同意参加本研究,他们的年龄和教育程度相仿。短期记忆采用数字跨度测试(DST)、加利福尼亚言语学习测试-第2版-短式(CVLT-II)和简明视空间记忆测试-修订版(BVMT-R)进行评估;CVLT-II和BVMT-R分别评估言语和视空间学习:DST-后向(p = 0.016)和 DST-排序(p p = 0.237)。CVLT-II中的即时和延迟自由回忆得分(CVLT-II中p p p = 0.266,BVMT-R中p = 0.239):意义:失忆性 MCI 受试者的 STM 功能减弱,但学习能力完好。与数字-语言记忆测试相比,单词-语言记忆和/或视觉空间记忆测试更容易区分患有与未患有 MCI 的老年人在 STM 方面的差异。
Preserved learning despite impaired short-term memory in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.
Background: The impact of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) on short-term memory (STM) and learning performance assessed with different memory modalities was unknown. This study examined differences in STM and learning ability between verbal and visuospatial memory-modalities in older adults with aMCI.
Methods: Thirty-nine aMCI subjects (71.5 ± 6.0 yrs) and 33 non-MCI (control) subjects (71.1 ± 5.7 yrs) of similar age and educational attainment consented to participate in the study. Short-term memory was assessed using Digit-Span-Test (DST), California-Verbal-Learning-Test-2nd edition - short-form (CVLT-II), and Brief-Visuospatial-Memory-Test-Revised (BVMT-R); CVLT-II and BVMT-R assessed verbal-and visuospatial-learning, respectively.
Results: DST-Backward (p = 0.016) and DST-Sequencing (p < 0.001) scores were significantly lower in the aMCI vs. control subjects (Student's t-test), but DST-Forward scores did not differ (p = 0.237). Immediate and delayed free-recall scores in both CVLT-II (p < 0.001) and BVMT-R (p < 0.001) were lower in the aMCI subjects. The immediate free-recall scores in both tests improved with repeated trials (two-factor ANOVA: p < 0.001 for trial factor) to similar extents in the aMCI and control groups with no significant interaction of the trial and group factors (p = 0.266 in CVLT-II and p = 0.239 in BVMT-R).
Significance: Amnestic MCI subjects have diminished STM but intact learning ability. Differences in STM of older adults with vs. without aMCI are more readily distinguished by word-verbal memory and/or visuospatial memory testing than digit-verbal memory testing.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.