IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1560791
Elaina Smith, Christopher Cortez, April Wiechmann, Sandra Davis, Hannah Dyson, Krystyn Kucharski, Sarah Ross, Geoffrey Kline, Robert T Mallet, Xiangrong Shi
{"title":"Preserved learning despite impaired short-term memory in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Elaina Smith, Christopher Cortez, April Wiechmann, Sandra Davis, Hannah Dyson, Krystyn Kucharski, Sarah Ross, Geoffrey Kline, Robert T Mallet, Xiangrong Shi","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2025.1560791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) on short-term memory (STM) and learning performance assessed with different memory modalities was unknown. This study examined differences in STM and learning ability between verbal and visuospatial memory-modalities in older adults with aMCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine aMCI subjects (71.5 ± 6.0 yrs) and 33 non-MCI (control) subjects (71.1 ± 5.7 yrs) of similar age and educational attainment consented to participate in the study. Short-term memory was assessed using Digit-Span-Test (DST), California-Verbal-Learning-Test-2nd edition - short-form (CVLT-II), and Brief-Visuospatial-Memory-Test-Revised (BVMT-R); CVLT-II and BVMT-R assessed verbal-and visuospatial-learning, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DST-Backward (<i>p</i> = 0.016) and DST-Sequencing (<i>p</i> < 0.001) scores were significantly lower in the aMCI vs. control subjects (Student's t-test), but DST-Forward scores did not differ (<i>p</i> = 0.237). Immediate and delayed free-recall scores in both CVLT-II (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and BVMT-R (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were lower in the aMCI subjects. The immediate free-recall scores in both tests improved with repeated trials (two-factor ANOVA: <i>p</i> < 0.001 for trial factor) to similar extents in the aMCI and control groups with no significant interaction of the trial and group factors (<i>p</i> = 0.266 in CVLT-II and <i>p</i> = 0.239 in BVMT-R).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Amnestic MCI subjects have diminished STM but intact learning ability. Differences in STM of older adults with vs. without aMCI are more readily distinguished by word-verbal memory and/or visuospatial memory testing than digit-verbal memory testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1560791"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1560791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:用不同的记忆模式评估失忆性轻度认知障碍(aMCI)对短时记忆(STM)和学习能力的影响尚不清楚。本研究考察了患有轻度认知障碍的老年人在言语记忆和视觉空间记忆模式下的短时记忆和学习能力的差异:39 名 aMCI 受试者(71.5±6.0 岁)和 33 名非 aMCI(对照组)受试者(71.1±5.7 岁)同意参加本研究,他们的年龄和教育程度相仿。短期记忆采用数字跨度测试(DST)、加利福尼亚言语学习测试-第2版-短式(CVLT-II)和简明视空间记忆测试-修订版(BVMT-R)进行评估;CVLT-II和BVMT-R分别评估言语和视空间学习:DST-后向(p = 0.016)和 DST-排序(p p = 0.237)。CVLT-II中的即时和延迟自由回忆得分(CVLT-II中p p p = 0.266,BVMT-R中p = 0.239):意义:失忆性 MCI 受试者的 STM 功能减弱,但学习能力完好。与数字-语言记忆测试相比,单词-语言记忆和/或视觉空间记忆测试更容易区分患有与未患有 MCI 的老年人在 STM 方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preserved learning despite impaired short-term memory in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Background: The impact of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) on short-term memory (STM) and learning performance assessed with different memory modalities was unknown. This study examined differences in STM and learning ability between verbal and visuospatial memory-modalities in older adults with aMCI.

Methods: Thirty-nine aMCI subjects (71.5 ± 6.0 yrs) and 33 non-MCI (control) subjects (71.1 ± 5.7 yrs) of similar age and educational attainment consented to participate in the study. Short-term memory was assessed using Digit-Span-Test (DST), California-Verbal-Learning-Test-2nd edition - short-form (CVLT-II), and Brief-Visuospatial-Memory-Test-Revised (BVMT-R); CVLT-II and BVMT-R assessed verbal-and visuospatial-learning, respectively.

Results: DST-Backward (p = 0.016) and DST-Sequencing (p < 0.001) scores were significantly lower in the aMCI vs. control subjects (Student's t-test), but DST-Forward scores did not differ (p = 0.237). Immediate and delayed free-recall scores in both CVLT-II (p < 0.001) and BVMT-R (p < 0.001) were lower in the aMCI subjects. The immediate free-recall scores in both tests improved with repeated trials (two-factor ANOVA: p < 0.001 for trial factor) to similar extents in the aMCI and control groups with no significant interaction of the trial and group factors (p = 0.266 in CVLT-II and p = 0.239 in BVMT-R).

Significance: Amnestic MCI subjects have diminished STM but intact learning ability. Differences in STM of older adults with vs. without aMCI are more readily distinguished by word-verbal memory and/or visuospatial memory testing than digit-verbal memory testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信