David M Garner, Tatiana Dias de Carvalho, Rubens Wajnsztejn, Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei, Vitor Engracia Valenti, Luiz Carlos de Abreu, Rodrigo Daminello Raimundo
{"title":"应用近似熵来确定儿童注意缺陷多动障碍最优复杂性的心率变异性的并发症。","authors":"David M Garner, Tatiana Dias de Carvalho, Rubens Wajnsztejn, Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei, Vitor Engracia Valenti, Luiz Carlos de Abreu, Rodrigo Daminello Raimundo","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05774-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim is to scrutinize approximate entropy (ApEn) to distinguish optimal complexity of heart rate variability (HRV) in children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This was accomplished by varying their embedding dimension m and tolerance r. Determination of optimal m and r is heuristic. ApEn was enforced in ADHD to assess its effects on the HRV chaotic response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 56 children divided equally into two groups: ADHD and control. Autonomic modulation of the heart rate was monitored for 20 min in the supine position without any physical, sensory or pharmacological stimuli. ApEn initially had r: 0.1 → 1.0 in 0.1 intervals and m: 1 → 10 in intervals of 1. The statistical significances were measured by three effect sizes: Cohen's d, Hedges' g and Glass's Δ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those most statistically important were for r = 0.9334, and m = 1, 2 and 3. Cohen's d (1.1277; m = 2) and Hedges' g (1.1119; m = 2) are the most reliable effect sizes. Glass's Δ (1.3724; m = 1) is unfortunately less reliable. ROC curve analysis shows AUC > 0.77 for r = 0.9334 and m = 1, 2, and 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ApEn recognized the increased chaotic response in ADHD. This was confirmed by three effect sizes, AUC and p value during ROC analysis. Still, ApEn is an unreliable mathematical marker. ADHD discrimination was only achieved by extending the surveillance ranges for r; 0.8 → 1.0 and m; 1 → 3 at intervals of 0.0167. This necessitates an 'a priori' study making it inapt for online analysis. Even so, it could be useful in 'post hoc' analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complications of applying approximate entropy to heart rate variability to locate optimal complexity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.\",\"authors\":\"David M Garner, Tatiana Dias de Carvalho, Rubens Wajnsztejn, Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei, Vitor Engracia Valenti, Luiz Carlos de Abreu, Rodrigo Daminello Raimundo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-025-05774-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim is to scrutinize approximate entropy (ApEn) to distinguish optimal complexity of heart rate variability (HRV) in children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This was accomplished by varying their embedding dimension m and tolerance r. Determination of optimal m and r is heuristic. ApEn was enforced in ADHD to assess its effects on the HRV chaotic response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 56 children divided equally into two groups: ADHD and control. Autonomic modulation of the heart rate was monitored for 20 min in the supine position without any physical, sensory or pharmacological stimuli. ApEn initially had r: 0.1 → 1.0 in 0.1 intervals and m: 1 → 10 in intervals of 1. The statistical significances were measured by three effect sizes: Cohen's d, Hedges' g and Glass's Δ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those most statistically important were for r = 0.9334, and m = 1, 2 and 3. Cohen's d (1.1277; m = 2) and Hedges' g (1.1119; m = 2) are the most reliable effect sizes. Glass's Δ (1.3724; m = 1) is unfortunately less reliable. ROC curve analysis shows AUC > 0.77 for r = 0.9334 and m = 1, 2, and 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ApEn recognized the increased chaotic response in ADHD. This was confirmed by three effect sizes, AUC and p value during ROC analysis. Still, ApEn is an unreliable mathematical marker. ADHD discrimination was only achieved by extending the surveillance ranges for r; 0.8 → 1.0 and m; 1 → 3 at intervals of 0.0167. This necessitates an 'a priori' study making it inapt for online analysis. Even so, it could be useful in 'post hoc' analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05774-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05774-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的是仔细检查近似熵(ApEn),以区分诊断为注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童的心率变异性(HRV)的最佳复杂性。这是通过改变它们的嵌入尺寸m和公差r来实现的。确定最优m和r是启发式的。在ADHD患者中实施ApEn以评估其对HRV混乱反应的影响。方法:56例儿童随机分为ADHD组和对照组。在没有任何物理、感觉或药物刺激的情况下,在仰卧位监测心率的自主调节20分钟。ApEn最初的r: 0.1→1.0间隔为0.1,m: 1→10间隔为1。统计显著性通过三个效应量来衡量:Cohen's d, Hedges' s g和Glass's Δ。结果:r = 0.9334, m = 1、2、3。Cohen’s d (1.1277;m = 2), Hedges的g (1.1119;M = 2)是最可靠的效应量。格拉斯的Δ (1.3724;不幸的是,M = 1)不太可靠。ROC曲线分析显示,当r = 0.9334, m = 1,2,3时,AUC > 0.77。结论:ApEn识别出ADHD患者混乱反应的增加。ROC分析的三个效应量、AUC和p值证实了这一点。然而,ApEn是一个不可靠的数学标记。只有通过扩大r的监测范围才能实现ADHD的区分;0.8→1.0和m;1→3,间隔0.0167。这需要一个“先验”的研究,使其不适合在线分析。即便如此,它在“事后”分析中还是有用的。
Complications of applying approximate entropy to heart rate variability to locate optimal complexity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Introduction: The aim is to scrutinize approximate entropy (ApEn) to distinguish optimal complexity of heart rate variability (HRV) in children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This was accomplished by varying their embedding dimension m and tolerance r. Determination of optimal m and r is heuristic. ApEn was enforced in ADHD to assess its effects on the HRV chaotic response.
Methods: We studied 56 children divided equally into two groups: ADHD and control. Autonomic modulation of the heart rate was monitored for 20 min in the supine position without any physical, sensory or pharmacological stimuli. ApEn initially had r: 0.1 → 1.0 in 0.1 intervals and m: 1 → 10 in intervals of 1. The statistical significances were measured by three effect sizes: Cohen's d, Hedges' g and Glass's Δ.
Results: Those most statistically important were for r = 0.9334, and m = 1, 2 and 3. Cohen's d (1.1277; m = 2) and Hedges' g (1.1119; m = 2) are the most reliable effect sizes. Glass's Δ (1.3724; m = 1) is unfortunately less reliable. ROC curve analysis shows AUC > 0.77 for r = 0.9334 and m = 1, 2, and 3.
Conclusion: ApEn recognized the increased chaotic response in ADHD. This was confirmed by three effect sizes, AUC and p value during ROC analysis. Still, ApEn is an unreliable mathematical marker. ADHD discrimination was only achieved by extending the surveillance ranges for r; 0.8 → 1.0 and m; 1 → 3 at intervals of 0.0167. This necessitates an 'a priori' study making it inapt for online analysis. Even so, it could be useful in 'post hoc' analysis.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.