早期二甲双胍加常规治疗降低妊娠糖尿病的成本效益(EMERGE)——一项随机安慰剂对照临床试验。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Paddy Gillespie, Ronan Mahon, Christine Newman, Alberto Alvarez-Iglesias, John Ferguson, Andrew Smyth, Paula O'Shea, Declan Devane, Aoife Egan, Martin O'Donnell, Fidelma Dunne
{"title":"早期二甲双胍加常规治疗降低妊娠糖尿病的成本效益(EMERGE)——一项随机安慰剂对照临床试验。","authors":"Paddy Gillespie, Ronan Mahon, Christine Newman, Alberto Alvarez-Iglesias, John Ferguson, Andrew Smyth, Paula O'Shea, Declan Devane, Aoife Egan, Martin O'Donnell, Fidelma Dunne","doi":"10.1111/dme.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early initiation of metformin and usual care for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Economic evaluation from a healthcare perspective, based on the EMERGE randomised controlled trial. In total, 535 women with GDM were randomised to placebo in addition to usual care or metformin in addition to usual care. Economic outcomes included incremental healthcare costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and expected cost-effectiveness at cost-effectiveness threshold values of €20,000, €45,000 and €100,000 per QALY gained. Uncertainty was explored using parametric, non-parametric, deterministic and probabilistic methods and heterogeneity using subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, relative to the placebo arm, the early metformin arm was associated with non-statistically significant mean increases of €193.07 (95% CI: -€789.88, €1176.01; p = 0.700) and 0.002 QALYs (95% CI: -0.009, 0.013; p = 0.771). In terms of expected cost-effectiveness at threshold values of €20,000, €45,000 and €100,000 per QALY gained, the probability of the early metformin arm being more cost-effective was estimated at 0.423, 0.452 and 0.524. Exploratory subgroup analyses provided more favourable but not definitive evidence in favour of the early metformin arm for cohorts with previous GDM and previous caesarean section.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We do not find definitive evidence that early initiation of metformin in addition to usual care for GDM was more cost-effective than usual care alone. The clinical and economic evidence may be considered equivocal, but worthy of further examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e70036"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost effectiveness of early metformin in addition to usual care in the reduction of gestational diabetes mellitus effects (EMERGE)-A randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Paddy Gillespie, Ronan Mahon, Christine Newman, Alberto Alvarez-Iglesias, John Ferguson, Andrew Smyth, Paula O'Shea, Declan Devane, Aoife Egan, Martin O'Donnell, Fidelma Dunne\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.70036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early initiation of metformin and usual care for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Economic evaluation from a healthcare perspective, based on the EMERGE randomised controlled trial. In total, 535 women with GDM were randomised to placebo in addition to usual care or metformin in addition to usual care. Economic outcomes included incremental healthcare costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and expected cost-effectiveness at cost-effectiveness threshold values of €20,000, €45,000 and €100,000 per QALY gained. Uncertainty was explored using parametric, non-parametric, deterministic and probabilistic methods and heterogeneity using subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, relative to the placebo arm, the early metformin arm was associated with non-statistically significant mean increases of €193.07 (95% CI: -€789.88, €1176.01; p = 0.700) and 0.002 QALYs (95% CI: -0.009, 0.013; p = 0.771). In terms of expected cost-effectiveness at threshold values of €20,000, €45,000 and €100,000 per QALY gained, the probability of the early metformin arm being more cost-effective was estimated at 0.423, 0.452 and 0.524. Exploratory subgroup analyses provided more favourable but not definitive evidence in favour of the early metformin arm for cohorts with previous GDM and previous caesarean section.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We do not find definitive evidence that early initiation of metformin in addition to usual care for GDM was more cost-effective than usual care alone. The clinical and economic evidence may be considered equivocal, but worthy of further examination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)早期应用二甲双胍及常规护理的成本-效果。方法:基于EMERGE随机对照试验,从医疗保健角度进行经济评价。总共有535名患有GDM的女性被随机分配到常规护理之外的安慰剂组或常规护理之外的二甲双胍组。经济成果包括增加的医疗保健成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs),以及按每个获得的质量调整生命年的成本效益阈值分别为20,000欧元、45,000欧元和100,000欧元计算的预期成本效益。使用参数、非参数、确定性和概率方法探讨不确定性,使用亚群分析探讨异质性。结果:平均而言,相对于安慰剂组,早期二甲双胍组与无统计学意义的平均增加193.07欧元相关(95% CI: - 789.88欧元,1176.01欧元;p = 0.700)和0.002 QALYs (95% CI: -0.009, 0.013;p = 0.771)。在每个QALY获得的阈值为20,000欧元、45,000欧元和100,000欧元时的预期成本效益方面,早期二甲双胍组更具成本效益的概率估计为0.423、0.452和0.524。探索性亚组分析提供了更有利但不确定的证据,支持早期二甲双胍组对既往GDM和既往剖腹产的队列。结论:我们没有发现明确的证据表明,早期开始二甲双胍加上常规护理的GDM比常规护理更具有成本效益。临床和经济证据可能被认为是模棱两可的,但值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost effectiveness of early metformin in addition to usual care in the reduction of gestational diabetes mellitus effects (EMERGE)-A randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Aims: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early initiation of metformin and usual care for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods: Economic evaluation from a healthcare perspective, based on the EMERGE randomised controlled trial. In total, 535 women with GDM were randomised to placebo in addition to usual care or metformin in addition to usual care. Economic outcomes included incremental healthcare costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and expected cost-effectiveness at cost-effectiveness threshold values of €20,000, €45,000 and €100,000 per QALY gained. Uncertainty was explored using parametric, non-parametric, deterministic and probabilistic methods and heterogeneity using subgroup analysis.

Results: On average, relative to the placebo arm, the early metformin arm was associated with non-statistically significant mean increases of €193.07 (95% CI: -€789.88, €1176.01; p = 0.700) and 0.002 QALYs (95% CI: -0.009, 0.013; p = 0.771). In terms of expected cost-effectiveness at threshold values of €20,000, €45,000 and €100,000 per QALY gained, the probability of the early metformin arm being more cost-effective was estimated at 0.423, 0.452 and 0.524. Exploratory subgroup analyses provided more favourable but not definitive evidence in favour of the early metformin arm for cohorts with previous GDM and previous caesarean section.

Conclusions: We do not find definitive evidence that early initiation of metformin in addition to usual care for GDM was more cost-effective than usual care alone. The clinical and economic evidence may be considered equivocal, but worthy of further examination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信