评估护士对大剂量皮下给药的新型体内给药系统与手动注射器的偏好:一项调查研究。

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drug Delivery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10717544.2025.2484278
Mehul Desai, Beth Faiman, Lisa A Gorski, Ashley Miles, Valentina Sterlin, Nicole Curry
{"title":"评估护士对大剂量皮下给药的新型体内给药系统与手动注射器的偏好:一项调查研究。","authors":"Mehul Desai, Beth Faiman, Lisa A Gorski, Ashley Miles, Valentina Sterlin, Nicole Curry","doi":"10.1080/10717544.2025.2484278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While nurses report challenges with the manual administration of large-volume subcutaneous drugs, these challenges and potential solutions are not captured in the literature. In this cross-sectional study, 45 nurses with experience administering large-volume subcutaneous biologics completed an 18-item survey about preferences for syringes vs. on-body delivery systems. 100% responded that an on-body delivery system seemed easy to learn and use and preferable to syringes. In a drug delivery scenario including comprehensive administration details and assuming equivalent safety and efficacy, 97.78% preferred the on-body delivery system to a daratumumab/hyaluronidase syringe. In the total sample, this preference was primarily attributed to (1) reduced nurse effort due to hands-free delivery, (2) decreased patient pain due to a thinner needle, (3) elimination of needlestick injuries due to a hidden needle, and (4) increased clinic efficiency due to hands-free delivery. 95.56% felt that the on-body delivery system would improve clinic throughput better than syringes. Nurses reported that an on-body delivery system would be easy to learn and use and would improve clinic efficiency and safety. They underscored the importance of decreasing nurse physical burden, needlestick injuries, and patient needle phobia. Contrary to the assumption that speed is paramount, nurses prioritized reducing effort, enhancing administration safety, and improving patient comfort over injection speed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11679,"journal":{"name":"Drug Delivery","volume":"32 1","pages":"2484278"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating nurse preferences for a novel on-body delivery system vs. manual syringes for large-volume subcutaneous drug administration: a survey study.\",\"authors\":\"Mehul Desai, Beth Faiman, Lisa A Gorski, Ashley Miles, Valentina Sterlin, Nicole Curry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10717544.2025.2484278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While nurses report challenges with the manual administration of large-volume subcutaneous drugs, these challenges and potential solutions are not captured in the literature. In this cross-sectional study, 45 nurses with experience administering large-volume subcutaneous biologics completed an 18-item survey about preferences for syringes vs. on-body delivery systems. 100% responded that an on-body delivery system seemed easy to learn and use and preferable to syringes. In a drug delivery scenario including comprehensive administration details and assuming equivalent safety and efficacy, 97.78% preferred the on-body delivery system to a daratumumab/hyaluronidase syringe. In the total sample, this preference was primarily attributed to (1) reduced nurse effort due to hands-free delivery, (2) decreased patient pain due to a thinner needle, (3) elimination of needlestick injuries due to a hidden needle, and (4) increased clinic efficiency due to hands-free delivery. 95.56% felt that the on-body delivery system would improve clinic throughput better than syringes. Nurses reported that an on-body delivery system would be easy to learn and use and would improve clinic efficiency and safety. They underscored the importance of decreasing nurse physical burden, needlestick injuries, and patient needle phobia. Contrary to the assumption that speed is paramount, nurses prioritized reducing effort, enhancing administration safety, and improving patient comfort over injection speed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Delivery\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"2484278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2025.2484278\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2025.2484278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然护士报告了人工给药大剂量皮下药物的挑战,但这些挑战和潜在的解决方案并没有在文献中被捕获。在这项横断面研究中,45名具有大剂量皮下生物制剂管理经验的护士完成了一项关于注射器与体内给药系统偏好的18项调查。100%的人回答说,体内给药系统似乎容易学习和使用,比注射器更可取。在包括全面给药细节并假设同等安全性和有效性的给药方案中,97.78%的人更喜欢体内给药系统,而不是达拉单抗/透明质酸酶注射器。在整个样本中,这种偏好主要归因于(1)免手分娩减少了护士的工作量,(2)由于针头更细减少了患者的疼痛,(3)由于隐藏针头消除了针刺伤害,(4)由于免手分娩提高了临床效率。95.56%的人认为体外给药系统比注射器更能提高临床吞吐率。护士报告说,身体输送系统将易于学习和使用,并将提高诊所的效率和安全性。他们强调了减少护士身体负担、针刺伤害和患者针头恐惧症的重要性。与速度至上的假设相反,护士优先考虑减少工作量,提高管理安全性,提高患者舒适度,而不是注射速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating nurse preferences for a novel on-body delivery system vs. manual syringes for large-volume subcutaneous drug administration: a survey study.

While nurses report challenges with the manual administration of large-volume subcutaneous drugs, these challenges and potential solutions are not captured in the literature. In this cross-sectional study, 45 nurses with experience administering large-volume subcutaneous biologics completed an 18-item survey about preferences for syringes vs. on-body delivery systems. 100% responded that an on-body delivery system seemed easy to learn and use and preferable to syringes. In a drug delivery scenario including comprehensive administration details and assuming equivalent safety and efficacy, 97.78% preferred the on-body delivery system to a daratumumab/hyaluronidase syringe. In the total sample, this preference was primarily attributed to (1) reduced nurse effort due to hands-free delivery, (2) decreased patient pain due to a thinner needle, (3) elimination of needlestick injuries due to a hidden needle, and (4) increased clinic efficiency due to hands-free delivery. 95.56% felt that the on-body delivery system would improve clinic throughput better than syringes. Nurses reported that an on-body delivery system would be easy to learn and use and would improve clinic efficiency and safety. They underscored the importance of decreasing nurse physical burden, needlestick injuries, and patient needle phobia. Contrary to the assumption that speed is paramount, nurses prioritized reducing effort, enhancing administration safety, and improving patient comfort over injection speed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Delivery
Drug Delivery 医学-药学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
250
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Drug Delivery is an open access journal serving the academic and industrial communities with peer reviewed coverage of basic research, development, and application principles of drug delivery and targeting at molecular, cellular, and higher levels. Topics covered include all delivery systems including oral, pulmonary, nasal, parenteral and transdermal, and modes of entry such as controlled release systems; microcapsules, liposomes, vesicles, and macromolecular conjugates; antibody targeting; protein/peptide delivery; DNA, oligonucleotide and siRNA delivery. Papers on drug dosage forms and their optimization will not be considered unless they directly relate to the original drug delivery issues. Published articles present original research and critical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信