使用可解释的机器学习方法结合血浆生物标志物和传统危险因素,改进主要不良心血管事件的预测和风险分层。

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xi-Ru Zhang, Wen-Fang Zhong, Rui-Yan Liu, Jie-Lin Huang, Jing-Xiang Fu, Jian Gao, Pei-Dong Zhang, Dan Liu, Zhi-Hao Li, Yan He, Hongwei Zhou, Zhuang Li
{"title":"使用可解释的机器学习方法结合血浆生物标志物和传统危险因素,改进主要不良心血管事件的预测和风险分层。","authors":"Xi-Ru Zhang, Wen-Fang Zhong, Rui-Yan Liu, Jie-Lin Huang, Jing-Xiang Fu, Jian Gao, Pei-Dong Zhang, Dan Liu, Zhi-Hao Li, Yan He, Hongwei Zhou, Zhuang Li","doi":"10.1186/s12933-025-02711-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Traditional risk models, primarily based on established risk factors, often lack the precision needed to accurately predict new-onset major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). This study aimed to improve prediction and risk stratification by integrating traditional risk factors with biochemical and metabolomic biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 229,352 participants in the UK Biobank (median age 58.0 years; 45.4% male) who were free of baseline MACE. Biomarker selection was conducted using area under the curve (AUC), minimal joint mutual information maximization (JMIM), and correlation analyses, while Cox proportional hazards models were employed to evaluate the predictive performance of combined traditional risk factors and biomarkers. Optimal binary thresholds were determined utilizing CatBoost and SHAP, leading to the calculation of a Biomarker Risk Score (BRS) for each participant. Multivariable Cox models were conducted to assess the associations of each concerned biomarker and BRS with new-onset endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combination of PANEL + All Biochemistry + Cor0.95 of Nonov Met predictors demonstrated significantly improved discriminative performance compared to traditional models, such as Age + Sex and ASCVD, across all endpoints. Although the prediction for hemorrhagic stroke was suboptimal (C-index = 0.699), C-index values for other outcomes surpassed 0.75, with the highest value (0.822) recorded for CVD-related mortality. Key predictors of new-onset MACE included cystatin C, HbA1c, GlycA, and GGT, while IGF-1 and DHA exhibited potential protective effects. The BRS stratified individuals into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with the strongest effect observed for CVD death, where the high-risk group had a relative risk of 2.76 (95% CI 2.48-3.07) compared to the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating traditional risk factors and biomarkers improves prediction and risk stratification of new-onset MACE. The BRS shows promise as a tool for identifying high-risk individuals, with the potential to support personalized CVD prevention and management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":"24 1","pages":"153"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved prediction and risk stratification of major adverse cardiovascular events using an explainable machine learning approach combining plasma biomarkers and traditional risk factors.\",\"authors\":\"Xi-Ru Zhang, Wen-Fang Zhong, Rui-Yan Liu, Jie-Lin Huang, Jing-Xiang Fu, Jian Gao, Pei-Dong Zhang, Dan Liu, Zhi-Hao Li, Yan He, Hongwei Zhou, Zhuang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12933-025-02711-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Traditional risk models, primarily based on established risk factors, often lack the precision needed to accurately predict new-onset major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). This study aimed to improve prediction and risk stratification by integrating traditional risk factors with biochemical and metabolomic biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 229,352 participants in the UK Biobank (median age 58.0 years; 45.4% male) who were free of baseline MACE. Biomarker selection was conducted using area under the curve (AUC), minimal joint mutual information maximization (JMIM), and correlation analyses, while Cox proportional hazards models were employed to evaluate the predictive performance of combined traditional risk factors and biomarkers. Optimal binary thresholds were determined utilizing CatBoost and SHAP, leading to the calculation of a Biomarker Risk Score (BRS) for each participant. Multivariable Cox models were conducted to assess the associations of each concerned biomarker and BRS with new-onset endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combination of PANEL + All Biochemistry + Cor0.95 of Nonov Met predictors demonstrated significantly improved discriminative performance compared to traditional models, such as Age + Sex and ASCVD, across all endpoints. Although the prediction for hemorrhagic stroke was suboptimal (C-index = 0.699), C-index values for other outcomes surpassed 0.75, with the highest value (0.822) recorded for CVD-related mortality. Key predictors of new-onset MACE included cystatin C, HbA1c, GlycA, and GGT, while IGF-1 and DHA exhibited potential protective effects. The BRS stratified individuals into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with the strongest effect observed for CVD death, where the high-risk group had a relative risk of 2.76 (95% CI 2.48-3.07) compared to the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating traditional risk factors and biomarkers improves prediction and risk stratification of new-onset MACE. The BRS shows promise as a tool for identifying high-risk individuals, with the potential to support personalized CVD prevention and management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Diabetology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966882/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Diabetology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02711-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02711-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心血管疾病(CVD)仍然是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。传统的风险模型主要基于已确定的风险因素,往往缺乏准确预测新发主要心血管不良事件(MACE)所需的精度。本研究旨在通过将传统的危险因素与生化和代谢组学生物标志物相结合,提高预测和风险分层。方法:我们分析了来自英国生物银行(UK Biobank) 229352名参与者的数据(中位年龄58.0岁;45.4%男性),无基线MACE。采用曲线下面积(AUC)、最小联合互信息最大化(JMIM)和相关性分析进行生物标志物选择,采用Cox比例风险模型评估传统风险因素和生物标志物组合的预测效果。利用CatBoost和SHAP确定最佳二进制阈值,从而计算每个参与者的生物标志物风险评分(BRS)。采用多变量Cox模型评估每个相关生物标志物和BRS与新发终点的关联。结果:与传统模型(如年龄+性别和ASCVD)相比,PANEL + All Biochemistry + Cor0.95的Nonov Met预测因子组合在所有终点上的判别性能均显著提高。尽管对出血性卒中的预测不理想(C-index = 0.699),但其他结局的C-index值超过0.75,cvd相关死亡率的C-index值最高(0.822)。新发MACE的关键预测因子包括胱抑素C、HbA1c、GlycA和GGT,而IGF-1和DHA具有潜在的保护作用。BRS将个体分为低、中、高风险组,对心血管疾病死亡的影响最大,与低风险组相比,高风险组的相对风险为2.76 (95% CI 2.48-3.07)。结论:将传统危险因素与生物标志物相结合,可改善新发MACE的预测和风险分层。BRS有望成为识别高危人群的工具,具有支持个性化心血管疾病预防和管理策略的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved prediction and risk stratification of major adverse cardiovascular events using an explainable machine learning approach combining plasma biomarkers and traditional risk factors.

Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Traditional risk models, primarily based on established risk factors, often lack the precision needed to accurately predict new-onset major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). This study aimed to improve prediction and risk stratification by integrating traditional risk factors with biochemical and metabolomic biomarkers.

Methods: We analyzed data from 229,352 participants in the UK Biobank (median age 58.0 years; 45.4% male) who were free of baseline MACE. Biomarker selection was conducted using area under the curve (AUC), minimal joint mutual information maximization (JMIM), and correlation analyses, while Cox proportional hazards models were employed to evaluate the predictive performance of combined traditional risk factors and biomarkers. Optimal binary thresholds were determined utilizing CatBoost and SHAP, leading to the calculation of a Biomarker Risk Score (BRS) for each participant. Multivariable Cox models were conducted to assess the associations of each concerned biomarker and BRS with new-onset endpoints.

Results: The combination of PANEL + All Biochemistry + Cor0.95 of Nonov Met predictors demonstrated significantly improved discriminative performance compared to traditional models, such as Age + Sex and ASCVD, across all endpoints. Although the prediction for hemorrhagic stroke was suboptimal (C-index = 0.699), C-index values for other outcomes surpassed 0.75, with the highest value (0.822) recorded for CVD-related mortality. Key predictors of new-onset MACE included cystatin C, HbA1c, GlycA, and GGT, while IGF-1 and DHA exhibited potential protective effects. The BRS stratified individuals into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with the strongest effect observed for CVD death, where the high-risk group had a relative risk of 2.76 (95% CI 2.48-3.07) compared to the low-risk group.

Conclusion: Integrating traditional risk factors and biomarkers improves prediction and risk stratification of new-onset MACE. The BRS shows promise as a tool for identifying high-risk individuals, with the potential to support personalized CVD prevention and management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiovascular Diabetology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信