血小板与中性粒细胞比值对糖尿病性黄斑水肿的诊断价值。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Huixin Sun, Yao Li, Shihan Liu, Chunxing Pan, Danting Li, Xiyuan Zhou
{"title":"血小板与中性粒细胞比值对糖尿病性黄斑水肿的诊断价值。","authors":"Huixin Sun, Yao Li, Shihan Liu, Chunxing Pan, Danting Li, Xiyuan Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04001-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic value of platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR) in the occurrence of diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 366 participants categorized into four groups: DME group (n = 96), DR group (n = 90, DR without DME), diabetes mellitus (DM) group (n = 90, without DR), and healthy control group (n = 90). PNR was calculated by dividing the platelet count by the neutrophil count. Each subject was classified as one of three DME types according to the optical coherence tomography (OCT) features: diffuse retinal thickening (DRT), cystoid macular edema (CME), serous retinal detachment (SRD). The correlations between the PNR and the occurrence of DME, as well as the DME subtypes based on OCT were investigated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the risk factors for DME. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the predictive value of PNR for DME.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DME group exhibited significantly lower PNR level compared to the other three groups [50.73 (38.92, 65.20) in DME group, 95.63 (68.83, 120.19) in DR group, 92.39 (72.38, 130.61) in DM group, and 100.66 (75.26, 152.77) in healthy control group, respectively, p < 0.001], but did not differ across the DME subtypes based on OCT (p = 0.548). The ROC curve demonstrated that the PNR could better predict DME (area under the curve = 0.832, 95% confidence interval: 0.773 - 0.891, p < 0.001). When the cut-off value of the PNR was 68.51, the sensitivity was 80.2%, and the specificity was 75.6%. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that PNR ≤ 68.51 was an independent risk factor for DME occurrence in DR patients (Odds ratio = 12.05, 95% confidence interval: 5.93 - 24.47, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PNR ≤ 68.51 was strongly associated with the development of DME in DR patients, while no significant differences in PNR levels were observed across the different OCT morphological groups. Hence, PNR may serve as a valuable diagnostic biomarker for identifying DME, thereby enhancing risk stratification and management strategies for patients with DR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic value of platelet-to-neutrophil ratio in diabetic macular edema.\",\"authors\":\"Huixin Sun, Yao Li, Shihan Liu, Chunxing Pan, Danting Li, Xiyuan Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12886-025-04001-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic value of platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR) in the occurrence of diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 366 participants categorized into four groups: DME group (n = 96), DR group (n = 90, DR without DME), diabetes mellitus (DM) group (n = 90, without DR), and healthy control group (n = 90). PNR was calculated by dividing the platelet count by the neutrophil count. Each subject was classified as one of three DME types according to the optical coherence tomography (OCT) features: diffuse retinal thickening (DRT), cystoid macular edema (CME), serous retinal detachment (SRD). The correlations between the PNR and the occurrence of DME, as well as the DME subtypes based on OCT were investigated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the risk factors for DME. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the predictive value of PNR for DME.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DME group exhibited significantly lower PNR level compared to the other three groups [50.73 (38.92, 65.20) in DME group, 95.63 (68.83, 120.19) in DR group, 92.39 (72.38, 130.61) in DM group, and 100.66 (75.26, 152.77) in healthy control group, respectively, p < 0.001], but did not differ across the DME subtypes based on OCT (p = 0.548). The ROC curve demonstrated that the PNR could better predict DME (area under the curve = 0.832, 95% confidence interval: 0.773 - 0.891, p < 0.001). When the cut-off value of the PNR was 68.51, the sensitivity was 80.2%, and the specificity was 75.6%. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that PNR ≤ 68.51 was an independent risk factor for DME occurrence in DR patients (Odds ratio = 12.05, 95% confidence interval: 5.93 - 24.47, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PNR ≤ 68.51 was strongly associated with the development of DME in DR patients, while no significant differences in PNR levels were observed across the different OCT morphological groups. Hence, PNR may serve as a valuable diagnostic biomarker for identifying DME, thereby enhancing risk stratification and management strategies for patients with DR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966880/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04001-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04001-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨血小板与中性粒细胞比值(PNR)在糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)患者糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)发生中的诊断价值。方法:本研究共纳入366名参与者,分为四组:DME组(n = 96)、DR组(n = 90, DR不含DME)、糖尿病组(n = 90,无DR)和健康对照组(n = 90)。PNR通过血小板计数除以中性粒细胞计数计算。每个受试者根据光学相干断层扫描(OCT)特征分为三种DME类型:弥漫性视网膜增厚(DRT)、囊样黄斑水肿(CME)、浆液性视网膜脱离(SRD)。探讨PNR与DME发生的相关性,以及基于OCT的DME亚型。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定DME的危险因素。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,评价PNR对DME的预测价值。结果:DME组PNR水平显著低于其他3组,DME组为50.73 (38.92,65.20),DR组为95.63 (68.83,120.19),DM组为92.39(72.38,130.61),健康对照组为100.66(75.26,152.77)。结论PNR≤68.51与DR患者DME发生密切相关,不同OCT形态组间PNR水平无显著差异。因此,PNR可作为鉴别二甲醚的有价值的诊断性生物标志物,从而增强DR患者的风险分层和管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The diagnostic value of platelet-to-neutrophil ratio in diabetic macular edema.

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR) in the occurrence of diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 366 participants categorized into four groups: DME group (n = 96), DR group (n = 90, DR without DME), diabetes mellitus (DM) group (n = 90, without DR), and healthy control group (n = 90). PNR was calculated by dividing the platelet count by the neutrophil count. Each subject was classified as one of three DME types according to the optical coherence tomography (OCT) features: diffuse retinal thickening (DRT), cystoid macular edema (CME), serous retinal detachment (SRD). The correlations between the PNR and the occurrence of DME, as well as the DME subtypes based on OCT were investigated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the risk factors for DME. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the predictive value of PNR for DME.

Results: DME group exhibited significantly lower PNR level compared to the other three groups [50.73 (38.92, 65.20) in DME group, 95.63 (68.83, 120.19) in DR group, 92.39 (72.38, 130.61) in DM group, and 100.66 (75.26, 152.77) in healthy control group, respectively, p < 0.001], but did not differ across the DME subtypes based on OCT (p = 0.548). The ROC curve demonstrated that the PNR could better predict DME (area under the curve = 0.832, 95% confidence interval: 0.773 - 0.891, p < 0.001). When the cut-off value of the PNR was 68.51, the sensitivity was 80.2%, and the specificity was 75.6%. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that PNR ≤ 68.51 was an independent risk factor for DME occurrence in DR patients (Odds ratio = 12.05, 95% confidence interval: 5.93 - 24.47, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: PNR ≤ 68.51 was strongly associated with the development of DME in DR patients, while no significant differences in PNR levels were observed across the different OCT morphological groups. Hence, PNR may serve as a valuable diagnostic biomarker for identifying DME, thereby enhancing risk stratification and management strategies for patients with DR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信