接受根管治疗或拔牙患者口腔健康相关生活质量和满意度的比较——一项前瞻性对照队列研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Emma Wigsten, Emine Camci, Anna Levinsson, Thomas Kvist, Dan Sebring, EndoReCo, Thomas Davidson
{"title":"接受根管治疗或拔牙患者口腔健康相关生活质量和满意度的比较——一项前瞻性对照队列研究","authors":"Emma Wigsten, Emine Camci, Anna Levinsson, Thomas Kvist, Dan Sebring, EndoReCo, Thomas Davidson","doi":"10.2340/aos.v83.42011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of root canal treatment on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in general dental practice and compare it with tooth extraction. Additionally, patient satisfaction following tooth-preserving treatment was assessed.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In all, 65 patients were recruited from 6 general dental clinics in Västra Götaland over 8 weeks, with 37 starting root canal treatment and 28 having extractions. Questionnaires, including Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) and 9 questions assessing patient satisfaction, were administered at treatment initiation, and at 1, 6, and 12 months. The responses from both modalities were analysed using descriptive and analytical statistical methods.  Results: The response rate ranged from 73.8% to 92.3%. Regarding OHRQoL, differences between the groups were few compared to baseline. However, significant improvements were observed in the extraction group at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, in the 'total score', and the dimensions 'pain', 'discomfort', and 'handicap'. Patient satisfaction was generally high, with cost being the least satisfactory item. Pain intensity remained consistently low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this prospective cohort study few differences were found between the two treatment modalities. However, significant improvements were observed in the extraction group in several dimensions. The patient satisfaction regarding root canal treatment was considered high.</p>","PeriodicalId":7313,"journal":{"name":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"83 ","pages":"588-595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction among patients undergoing root canal treatment or tooth extraction - A prospective controlled cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Wigsten, Emine Camci, Anna Levinsson, Thomas Kvist, Dan Sebring, EndoReCo, Thomas Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/aos.v83.42011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of root canal treatment on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in general dental practice and compare it with tooth extraction. Additionally, patient satisfaction following tooth-preserving treatment was assessed.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In all, 65 patients were recruited from 6 general dental clinics in Västra Götaland over 8 weeks, with 37 starting root canal treatment and 28 having extractions. Questionnaires, including Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) and 9 questions assessing patient satisfaction, were administered at treatment initiation, and at 1, 6, and 12 months. The responses from both modalities were analysed using descriptive and analytical statistical methods.  Results: The response rate ranged from 73.8% to 92.3%. Regarding OHRQoL, differences between the groups were few compared to baseline. However, significant improvements were observed in the extraction group at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, in the 'total score', and the dimensions 'pain', 'discomfort', and 'handicap'. Patient satisfaction was generally high, with cost being the least satisfactory item. Pain intensity remained consistently low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this prospective cohort study few differences were found between the two treatment modalities. However, significant improvements were observed in the extraction group in several dimensions. The patient satisfaction regarding root canal treatment was considered high.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"588-595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487112/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.42011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.42011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估根管治疗对口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响,并与拔牙进行比较。此外,评估患者对保牙治疗的满意度。材料和方法:在8周内,从Västra Götaland的6家普通牙科诊所招募了65例患者,其中37例开始根管治疗,28例进行拔牙。在治疗开始、1、6和12个月时进行问卷调查,包括口腔健康影响概况-14 (OHIP-14)和9个评估患者满意度的问题。使用描述性和分析性统计方法对两种方式的反应进行分析。结果:有效率为73.8% ~ 92.3%。关于OHRQoL,与基线相比,两组之间的差异很小。然而,在6个月和12个月的随访中,拔牙组在“总分”、“疼痛”、“不适”和“障碍”方面都有显著改善。患者满意度普遍较高,费用是最不满意的项目。疼痛强度一直很低。结论:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,两种治疗方式之间几乎没有发现差异。然而,提取组在几个方面观察到显著的改善。患者对根管治疗的满意度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction among patients undergoing root canal treatment or tooth extraction - A prospective controlled cohort study.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of root canal treatment on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in general dental practice and compare it with tooth extraction. Additionally, patient satisfaction following tooth-preserving treatment was assessed.

Material and methods: In all, 65 patients were recruited from 6 general dental clinics in Västra Götaland over 8 weeks, with 37 starting root canal treatment and 28 having extractions. Questionnaires, including Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) and 9 questions assessing patient satisfaction, were administered at treatment initiation, and at 1, 6, and 12 months. The responses from both modalities were analysed using descriptive and analytical statistical methods.  Results: The response rate ranged from 73.8% to 92.3%. Regarding OHRQoL, differences between the groups were few compared to baseline. However, significant improvements were observed in the extraction group at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, in the 'total score', and the dimensions 'pain', 'discomfort', and 'handicap'. Patient satisfaction was generally high, with cost being the least satisfactory item. Pain intensity remained consistently low.

Conclusions: In this prospective cohort study few differences were found between the two treatment modalities. However, significant improvements were observed in the extraction group in several dimensions. The patient satisfaction regarding root canal treatment was considered high.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes papers conveying new knowledge within all areas of oral health and disease sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信