健康无麸质双层皮塔饼的开发:营养、工艺和感官特性

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Maria Al Zoghbi, Maria El Deghel, Mireille Serhan, Dima Mnayer
{"title":"健康无麸质双层皮塔饼的开发:营养、工艺和感官特性","authors":"Maria Al Zoghbi,&nbsp;Maria El Deghel,&nbsp;Mireille Serhan,&nbsp;Dima Mnayer","doi":"10.1155/jfpp/3811480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bread is a commodity consumed by people all around the world. However, the prevalence of celiac disease and other gluten-related disorders, such as gluten intolerance, prevented these people from consuming bread and other gluten-containing foods. In this study, two gluten-free (GF) double-layer pita breads were developed containing tapioca flour and chickpea flour, respectively. Both of these breads are made from a base, free from allergens and synthetic additives, consisting of rice flour, cornstarch, guar gum, psyllium husk, yeast, sugar, and salt. The physicochemical properties, nutritional content, shelf-life, and acceptability of the formulated breads in addition to that of an industrial GF mix, used as control, were determined. The chickpea-based bread showed to have the highest moisture content (38.2%) but had a low rollability score and was the fastest to spoil. However, it showed more acceptability compared to the tapioca-based bread and had the lowest fat content (0.71%) and significant highest values for protein (5.51%) and fiber content (4.46%). The tapioca-based bread had higher rollability scores than the control bread with fat and fiber contents of 1.38%, and 2.19%, respectively. All of the tested samples showed decrease in moisture after 5 days of baking and a slight increase in yeast and molds, emphasizing the need for the GF breads to be consumed fresh or frozen for later consumption. All samples tested were below 20 ppm of gluten, making them safe for individuals with celiac disease. Chickpea and tapioca GF breads show a significantly lower caloric content (275 and 280 Kcal/100 g) compared to the control (370 Kcal/100 g). Moreover, the formulated GF double-layer breads, made from natural raw material, present a potential substitute option for individuals seeking products without wheat or other gluten-containing cereals and create avenues for the development of various GF products.</p>","PeriodicalId":15717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Processing and Preservation","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jfpp/3811480","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Healthy Gluten-Free Double-Layer Pita Bread: Nutritional, Technological, and Sensorial Properties\",\"authors\":\"Maria Al Zoghbi,&nbsp;Maria El Deghel,&nbsp;Mireille Serhan,&nbsp;Dima Mnayer\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jfpp/3811480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bread is a commodity consumed by people all around the world. However, the prevalence of celiac disease and other gluten-related disorders, such as gluten intolerance, prevented these people from consuming bread and other gluten-containing foods. In this study, two gluten-free (GF) double-layer pita breads were developed containing tapioca flour and chickpea flour, respectively. Both of these breads are made from a base, free from allergens and synthetic additives, consisting of rice flour, cornstarch, guar gum, psyllium husk, yeast, sugar, and salt. The physicochemical properties, nutritional content, shelf-life, and acceptability of the formulated breads in addition to that of an industrial GF mix, used as control, were determined. The chickpea-based bread showed to have the highest moisture content (38.2%) but had a low rollability score and was the fastest to spoil. However, it showed more acceptability compared to the tapioca-based bread and had the lowest fat content (0.71%) and significant highest values for protein (5.51%) and fiber content (4.46%). The tapioca-based bread had higher rollability scores than the control bread with fat and fiber contents of 1.38%, and 2.19%, respectively. All of the tested samples showed decrease in moisture after 5 days of baking and a slight increase in yeast and molds, emphasizing the need for the GF breads to be consumed fresh or frozen for later consumption. All samples tested were below 20 ppm of gluten, making them safe for individuals with celiac disease. Chickpea and tapioca GF breads show a significantly lower caloric content (275 and 280 Kcal/100 g) compared to the control (370 Kcal/100 g). Moreover, the formulated GF double-layer breads, made from natural raw material, present a potential substitute option for individuals seeking products without wheat or other gluten-containing cereals and create avenues for the development of various GF products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Processing and Preservation\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jfpp/3811480\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Processing and Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jfpp/3811480\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Processing and Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jfpp/3811480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面包是全世界人民消费的一种商品。然而,乳糜泻和其他麸质相关疾病的流行,如麸质不耐症,使这些人无法食用面包和其他含麸质的食物。以木薯粉和鹰嘴豆粉为主要原料,研制了两种无谷蛋白双层皮塔饼。这两种面包都是由米粉、玉米淀粉、瓜尔胶、车前草壳、酵母、糖和盐组成的基料制成的,不含过敏原和合成添加剂。确定了配方面包的理化性质、营养成分、保质期和可接受性,以及作为对照的工业GF混合物。鹰嘴豆面包的水分含量最高(38.2%),但可卷曲性评分较低,而且变质速度最快。但其脂肪含量最低(0.71%),蛋白质含量最高(5.51%),纤维含量最高(4.46%),可接受度高于木薯粉面包。木薯粉面包的可卷曲性得分高于对照面包,脂肪和纤维含量分别为1.38%和2.19%。经过5天的烘焙后,所有的测试样本都显示出水分减少,酵母和霉菌略有增加,这强调了GF面包需要新鲜或冷冻以供以后食用。所有测试样本的麸质含量都低于20ppm,对乳糜泻患者来说是安全的。鹰嘴豆和木薯粉无糖面包的热量含量(每100克275千卡和280千卡)明显低于对照组(每100克370千卡)。此外,由天然原料制成的配方无谷蛋白双层面包,为寻求不含小麦或其他含谷蛋白谷物的产品的个人提供了潜在的替代选择,并为开发各种无谷蛋白产品创造了途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of Healthy Gluten-Free Double-Layer Pita Bread: Nutritional, Technological, and Sensorial Properties

Development of Healthy Gluten-Free Double-Layer Pita Bread: Nutritional, Technological, and Sensorial Properties

Bread is a commodity consumed by people all around the world. However, the prevalence of celiac disease and other gluten-related disorders, such as gluten intolerance, prevented these people from consuming bread and other gluten-containing foods. In this study, two gluten-free (GF) double-layer pita breads were developed containing tapioca flour and chickpea flour, respectively. Both of these breads are made from a base, free from allergens and synthetic additives, consisting of rice flour, cornstarch, guar gum, psyllium husk, yeast, sugar, and salt. The physicochemical properties, nutritional content, shelf-life, and acceptability of the formulated breads in addition to that of an industrial GF mix, used as control, were determined. The chickpea-based bread showed to have the highest moisture content (38.2%) but had a low rollability score and was the fastest to spoil. However, it showed more acceptability compared to the tapioca-based bread and had the lowest fat content (0.71%) and significant highest values for protein (5.51%) and fiber content (4.46%). The tapioca-based bread had higher rollability scores than the control bread with fat and fiber contents of 1.38%, and 2.19%, respectively. All of the tested samples showed decrease in moisture after 5 days of baking and a slight increase in yeast and molds, emphasizing the need for the GF breads to be consumed fresh or frozen for later consumption. All samples tested were below 20 ppm of gluten, making them safe for individuals with celiac disease. Chickpea and tapioca GF breads show a significantly lower caloric content (275 and 280 Kcal/100 g) compared to the control (370 Kcal/100 g). Moreover, the formulated GF double-layer breads, made from natural raw material, present a potential substitute option for individuals seeking products without wheat or other gluten-containing cereals and create avenues for the development of various GF products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The journal presents readers with the latest research, knowledge, emerging technologies, and advances in food processing and preservation. Encompassing chemical, physical, quality, and engineering properties of food materials, the Journal of Food Processing and Preservation provides a balance between fundamental chemistry and engineering principles and applicable food processing and preservation technologies. This is the only journal dedicated to publishing both fundamental and applied research relating to food processing and preservation, benefiting the research, commercial, and industrial communities. It publishes research articles directed at the safe preservation and successful consumer acceptance of unique, innovative, non-traditional international or domestic foods. In addition, the journal features important discussions of current economic and regulatory policies and their effects on the safe and quality processing and preservation of a wide array of foods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信